Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hit Them and They’ll Run World’s Perception of U.S. on the line in Iraq
The American Enterprise Online ^ | 4/4/03 | Marni Soupcoff

Posted on 04/05/2003 5:54:55 AM PST by Valin

This past week, I went to an intriguing talk by Princeton Professor Bernard Lewis, an authority on Islamic history and the contemporary Middle East.

It was an intellectually stimulating lecture, but it elicited a few questions I feel I must pass on before delving into its substance. First, the Toronto history professor who introduced Professor Lewis had the shiniest, most carefully parted hair I’ve ever seen grace the skull of an academic. I’m talking neat, glistening newscaster hair, with every piece in its proper place. How are we going to function as a society if our intellectuals start sporting better coifs than our executives and trial lawyers? Won’t it throw things off? This was disturbing.

Second, Lewis delivered his talk to a packed auditorium (okay) from a dignified wooden podium (okay) beside a table covered with a cheerful blue gingham picnic cloth dotted with painted-on daisies and black-eyed susans (not okay). Why choose to accompany a serious lecture about the state of the Middle East by an eminent scholar with a bright and jolly floral tablecloth? Why have a tablecloth at all? Hell, why even have a table? This was also disturbing.

Third, I think everyone in the audience had SARS. Every time Lewis paused, at least thirty people in the auditorium started hacking and sneezing. The woman beside me blew her nose at the end of each new point as if in agreement or in disgust, I couldn’t tell. This was also disturbing and has caused me to take my temperature about seventy times since the lecture, just to be safe.

Luckily, the actual content of Lewis’s speech was enlightening and disturbing only in the sense that it brought out a point that has lingered in my mind since 9/11. Perhaps, he argued, the United States really did have an indirect hand in bringing about the attacks on itself, not in the ridiculous sense that many in the left have suggested (too rich, too Zionist, too capitalist), but because they allowed a perception to develop that the U.S. would not defend itself or fight back against those who attacked it.

According to Lewis much of Osama bin Landin’s appeal among his followers has stemmed from his ability to capitalize on a new sense of Muslim empowerment. His message is based on a belief that the West has become weak, providing a great opportunity for Muslims to reassert themselves. He and his followers saw the defeat of the Soviet Union as a triumph of Muslims over infidels due to the Muslims’ success in Afghanistan. And now they see the West as a soft enemy incapable of self-defense.

Americans? Hit them and they’ll run. Just look at the Vietnam War, Somalia, the embassy bombing in Nairobi, Kenya. The message was clear: the Americans will respond to violence against them with little more than harsh words and a tendency to pack up and head home.

I thought Professor Lewis’s point felt intuitively right. Even on a micro level, it is doubtful the 9/11 terrorists would have conceived their hijacking plans as they had if they had anticipated that American passengers and flight crews would have fought back with hard violence. (Thankfully, the terrorists underestimated individual Americans in this respect.) But if there is doubt in your mind, just consider that Saddam Hussein has been giving out copies of the movie Black Hawk Down—which brilliantly portrays a bloody battle in Mogadishu in which 18 U.S. soldiers died after being ambushed by angry Somalis —as a primer to show that the Americans are “a paper tiger” and, as Lewis said, a soft enemy.

After all, immediately after the 1993 Mogadishu incident—in which U.S. Rangers and Delta Force members still killed hundreds of Somalis despite being ambushed—President Clinton pulled U.S. troops from Somalia although popular opinion would have supported sending more. Somali warlord Aidid was left in power, and the American troops’ sacrifices and acts of bravery were essentially nullified. As author Mark Bowden, who penned the 1999 book Black Hawk Down, wrote recently: “The lesson our retreat [in Somalia] taught the world's terrorists and despots is that killing a few American soldiers, even at a cost of more than 500 of your own fighters, is enough to spook Uncle Sam.”

This is why the current war in Iraq is so vital, even beyond the important objectives of liberating the Iraqi people and containing a brutal dictator who has been building up weapons of mass destruction (which would of course be reasons enough). It is also an opportunity for the United States to destroy the perception that it is a weak, incapable power that will not fight back if attacked.

It is a chance to show, once and for all, that the Americans are a strong, proud, brave, and unwavering people. And that if you hit them, they will not run. They will fight. Honorably, honestly, and righteously.

The American Enterprise Online:


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clashofcivilizatio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Valin
I’m talking neat, glistening newscaster hair, with every piece in its proper place... a table covered with a cheerful blue gingham picnic cloth dotted with painted-on daisies and black-eyed susans


21 posted on 04/05/2003 7:09:04 AM PST by Nick Danger (More rallys planned! www.freerepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And an excellent opportunity to expose Islamists for the sniveling cowards that they are, as they scatter like cockroaches into the Iraqi woodwork.

...hiding behind small children they have snatched and carry as shields to avoid being shot.

22 posted on 04/05/2003 7:11:52 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Of course we already have heard this, and it's very much to the point. But there is one thing here that I never really thought through before, and it's extremely important:

He and his followers saw the defeat of the Soviet Union as a triumph of Muslims over infidels due to the Muslims’ success in Afghanistan.

In other words, the Islamists are under the illusion that they (not Ronald Reagan, the Poles, and the Pope) defeated the USSR as well as sent the Clintonoid US packing. No wonder they are delusional. That goes far to explain Chechnya and Kosovo, too.

23 posted on 04/05/2003 7:15:01 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Very good, point, Cicero. I wonder if they believe the pundants who said that if we inveded Afghanistan, it would be a Quagmire, or Iraq ....again they predicted our defeat and predicted a quagmire. And these pundants are Americans.
24 posted on 04/05/2003 7:22:19 AM PST by submarinerswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Anti-war assume Amerca is bad(wrong, misguided, nothing special).

I disagree they assume this; it is what they want the rest of the world to believe about us. The fact that they stay here betrays their true feelings.

25 posted on 04/05/2003 7:24:35 AM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Valin
This is an important point, but one that Peaceniks will never comprehend.
26 posted on 04/05/2003 7:27:58 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
When you have a liberal dit like Clinton or Carter in office, with no clear moral insight, you have a president that will misuse, misjudge, and sully the preception of America as being decadent and weak. Liberal's are a dangerous threat to the safety of America because they are morally void and intellectually flawed.
27 posted on 04/05/2003 7:38:19 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Actually it is the anti-American liberal press that has done most of this damage. The rest of the world has been watching our CNN types, and believe what they see, that we are corrupt, weak, indicisive, fat, lazy, immoral Americans.

They have never seen the vast heartland of real America, only what they see on CNN and from Hollywood.

28 posted on 04/05/2003 8:09:11 AM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Yes they did - and the saddest part was they felt guilty because we were the only superpower left on the planet.

The x42 gang BELIEVED that if they shared the technology and the weapons, then we would all be equal - which would mean nobody would attack us. And ... I heard Albright say that statement.

Only appeasers (cowards) could believe such tripe.
29 posted on 04/05/2003 4:42:53 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson