Skip to comments.
COLONEL REMOVED
Sky News ^
| April 4, 2003
Posted on 04/04/2003 4:51:52 PM PST by STOCKHRSE
A US commander who led a fierce push by Marines through southern Iraq towards Baghdad has been relieved of his post, a US military spokesman said.
The spokesman did not give any reasons for the move, AFP news agency reported.
The officer was named as Colonel Joe Dowdy, commander of >the Marines First Regimental Combat Team 1.
Dowdy was in command of 5,000 men and women and had led the regiment's advance through southern and central Iraq, including a bloody passage through the Euphrates River town of Nasiriyah.
He was described as a popular commander who kept casualties down in leading his troops to within 80 miles from Baghdad.
Military spokesman Steven Schweitzer said: "He was responsible for the regiment until three hours ago."
Officials at the US Central Command war headquarters in Qatar declined to comment.
"At this time we have no information about anyone being relieved of command," Centcom spokesman Lieutenant Commander Joshua Rushing said.
But another senior officer, who declined to be named, said a replacement for Dowdy had been announced and a helicopter crew had been given orders to ferry the colonel back to Kuwait.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: command; iraqifreedom; joedowdy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
04/04/2003 4:51:52 PM PST
by
STOCKHRSE
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: walkingman
This officer was going to be a General, wonder what he did/said/forgot?
3
posted on
04/04/2003 5:02:12 PM PST
by
bybybill
(first the public employees, next the fish and, finally, the children)
To: walkingman
4
posted on
04/04/2003 5:04:05 PM PST
by
STOCKHRSE
(God Bless and keep our Commander In Chief....We are expendable...)
To: STOCKHRSE
hell... from this story it could be just about anything. It could be somebody being sent home on emergency leave for some reason. Not much in the way of detail, and if *anybody* would know about it, it would be CENTCOM.
5
posted on
04/04/2003 5:06:40 PM PST
by
Ramius
To: STOCKHRSE
6
posted on
04/04/2003 5:08:05 PM PST
by
Clara Lou
(Well, he still has a nose, But, my, how it grows When the facts must conform to his views.)
To: STOCKHRSE
To: Lancey Howard
Sorry...I searched News/Activism and nothing came up...
8
posted on
04/04/2003 5:27:03 PM PST
by
STOCKHRSE
(God Bless and keep our Commander In Chief....We are expendable...)
To: STOCKHRSE
9
posted on
04/04/2003 5:33:33 PM PST
by
deport
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: STOCKHRSE
I searched News/Activism and nothing came up...This story is interesting enough to be posted twice anyway, in my opinion. Besides, your posting has an additional update at the end. I will be interested to find out more about this, because it is big news when a commander is yanked right in the middle of an offensive as important as this one. The other thread has a lot of speculation, but nothing firm yet.
BUMP
To: gcochran
Thus far I have not seen it officially stated as an "emergency leave." But if it becomes reported as such, then I must disagree with you. My experience in the military says, that if they call it an Emergency Leave, then it is based on a personal family matter. The military has a number of other methods to reassign, while avoiding a lot of undesirable questions. But to misuse Emergency Leave for such purposes would be way to overtly political for the military mind set and tradition.
Either the day or day after I got home from Vietnam (4-6-71), my battalion commander was all over the national news for a couple of days. He was relieved of command for saying the Vietnamization program was not working to the news media covering the battle at firebase 6, Doc To. I'm sure the military since then has developed a number of methods for avoiding such bad publicity during a battle. But using Emergency Leave for such, would not be one of them.
It seems to me that it is way to early to even speculate why this officer was relieved.
12
posted on
04/04/2003 7:55:55 PM PST
by
jackbob
To: walkingman
I've heard that is EXACTLY what happened, evidently some/many under his command were armed with weapons not considered to be PC.......and I have no clue what that means other than that some higher up heard about it & decided to cover his a**!
13
posted on
04/04/2003 8:19:15 PM PST
by
soozla
(We fought communism, we're fighting terrorism BUT liberalism will bring this country down!!)
To: soozla
"evidently some/many under his command were armed with weapons not considered to be PC......."
Maybe like Korea where the guys spent the evenings chopping of the noses of the bullets to make them real deadly.
14
posted on
04/04/2003 8:28:08 PM PST
by
dalereed
To: STOCKHRSE
Not Colonel Angus.
15
posted on
04/04/2003 8:30:00 PM PST
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
NO...Colonel Dowdy.
16
posted on
04/04/2003 8:36:08 PM PST
by
STOCKHRSE
(God Bless and keep our Commander In Chief....We are expendable...)
To: deport; SLB; Lion Den Dan; Squantos; Wally Cleaver; Travis McGee
Before folks leap to conclusions, I would not be surprised if he was 'relieved without prejudice'. I'm not certain if that's the proper phraseology, but it means relief due to combat fatigue or mental duress, and that happens in wartime especially if you wear the lives of 5,000+ Marines under you on your shoulders.
I've met a fine retired Army person that this happened to during Gulf War I. He's doing fine today as far as I know.
To: Ramius
It could be somebody being sent home on emergency leave for some reason. My thoughts exactly. What if (G-d forbid) his wife was raped and beaten. What if his son was struck by a car and was near death.
At this point, it could be anything.
To: Fred Mertz
I know the staff ops officer. Maybe he will be moved up.
19
posted on
04/04/2003 8:40:39 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Fred Mertz
I can understand that ........I stayed awake for almost 6 straight days during DS-1 and it turned my butt into a babbling buffoon. Small Cat Naps didn't do it for me that time. I'll wait for if any official reason from you FM .
Stay Safe !!
20
posted on
04/04/2003 8:42:25 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson