Skip to comments.
UN officials rebuke British commanders for urging local residents to loot
The Times ^
| 04.05.03
| Daniel McGrory
Posted on 04/04/2003 4:27:31 PM PST by yankeedame
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: yankeedame
Saddammnn and his buds stole billions from these people, pay backs a bitch, let`emtake what they want
2
posted on
04/04/2003 4:33:27 PM PST
by
bybybill
(first the public employees, next the fish and, finally, the children)
To: yankeedame
I agree with this. If someone stole something from you, should you attempt to take it back? No, it belongs to them -- they stole it fair and square. Apparently the UK and the US would challenge this way of living.
3
posted on
04/04/2003 4:51:32 PM PST
by
Dimensio
To: yankeedame
Good example of why we do not want the UN in Iraq in any capacity.
4
posted on
04/04/2003 4:58:24 PM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: yankeedame
Isn't it nice to see the UN weenies still defending their budds!
5
posted on
04/04/2003 5:00:35 PM PST
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: yankeedame
I say, as long as the place is still un safe for civilian law enforcement, let them loot.
In WW2, the French and British shot locals who were taking things that the German Army had left behind. I don't think the British want to be associatted with that sort of terrorising of the victims again.
The UN can just go supervise a dust storm in the Syrian desert, if they want a part of Iraq.
6
posted on
04/04/2003 5:02:08 PM PST
by
jimtorr
To: yankeedame
I actually agree with the UN on this, once your permit looting, it won't just stop at the Baath party headquarters, pretty soon every it becomes accepted behavior.
I think they should have simply held an organized process whereby the content of the headquarters is distributed to the people of the town in an orderly fashion. Respect for the rule of law is central to any attempt at creating a representive government, and encourage chaos does not help.
To: Truthsearcher
And they are supposed to do that... how? Did you see the near-riot they had just giving out the supplies that got to Umm Qasr?
To: wcentrella
That was a fight to food and water, people are frantic for for survival items, not this stuff.
To: Truthsearcher; Pete-R-Bilt
If you and your entire family had been living in total fear of a particular group for the past thity years would you not want to demolish every last bit of their existence once they were defeated?
Of course you would. Yes, murders(illegal executions) will commence immediately upon the people who executed, threatened, robbed, raped, beat, and jailed these people illegally.
You are comparing our sorry justice system with what you and I refer to as looting by the freed. Sorry, in Iraq there hasn't been any comparison for three decades and they people are now getting what revenge they can before a half decent justice system arises.
10
posted on
04/04/2003 5:59:42 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Keep America safe! Thank the troops for our freedom. No slack for Iraq!)
To: Truthsearcher
11
posted on
04/04/2003 6:01:53 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Keep America safe! Thank the troops for our freedom. No slack for Iraq!)
To: Thud
Now we know which side the U.N. was really on.
To: yankeedame
Koffi Annan just wants to get his greasy paws on some of the good stuff before it's dispersed to the common man. Just a bunch of frickin' thugs at the UN.
To: B4Ranch; glock rocks
people are now getting what revenge they can before a half decent justice system arises.now i know,
you are an optimist...
14
posted on
04/04/2003 6:05:45 PM PST
by
Pete-R-Bilt
(If the legislators you vote for don't support our Troops, YOU don't support our Troops!)
To: yankeedame
"UNITED NATIONS officials have rebuked British commanders for urging local residents to loot buildings belonging to the Iraqi Army and the ruling Baath Party." UNITED NATIONS officials have rebuked British commanders for urging local residents to loot buildings belonging to the Iraqi Army and the ruling Baath Party turning over the rich food supplies to the hungry people.
Why the h*ll should the Brits, or we, give a happy d*mn what the Blixie boys at the UN say? They had their chance. They blew it. Time for them to sit down, shut up and stay out of the way.
15
posted on
04/04/2003 6:06:57 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your your mouth and remove all doubt.")
To: Dimensio
The ole finders keepers loosers weepers rules of engagement.
Æ
16
posted on
04/04/2003 6:08:11 PM PST
by
AgentEcho
(If you're in a fair fight you've done something wrong.)
To: jimtorr
17
posted on
04/04/2003 6:10:36 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your your mouth and remove all doubt.")
To: yankeedame
They are just reclaiming what is theirs, it was all stolen by Saddam and the current regime.
18
posted on
04/04/2003 6:12:41 PM PST
by
rundy
To: yankeedame
The U who?
Rebuking British soldiers?
I was under the impression the UN is not a party to this action.If they have a problem, shouldnt they draft up and vote on the resolution, prior to rebuking?
Am I the only one who thinks the UN should get "dixie chicked" for this outragious and innapropriate comment?LOL!
19
posted on
04/04/2003 6:14:44 PM PST
by
sarasmom
To: yankeedame
Why doesn't someone tell the UN to go suck? When I start listening to a bunch of tin-horn dictatorships and pussy French, that will be the day.
20
posted on
04/04/2003 6:16:00 PM PST
by
jackbill
(i)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson