Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
It wouldn't necessarily kill the fish right off. Fish lived in the Hudson River in NYC all through the worst years of pollution. But you wouldn't want to drink it.

I would guess this is either pollution or dumping.
33 posted on 04/04/2003 2:09:05 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
Thanks for the comments.
36 posted on 04/04/2003 2:11:17 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
Fish lived in the Hudson River in NYC all through the worst years of pollution. But you wouldn't want to drink it.
Or eat the striped bass that spawn in it.
42 posted on 04/04/2003 2:33:31 PM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
Good point. In northwestern IN. there is a lovely little river called the Little Calumet. From its outlet to Lake Michigan all the way up past Hammond IN it is considered unsafe to touch let alone drink from (heavy metals, clorinated hydrocarbons, petroleum products, storm drain/sewage mix-you name it, chances are its there), and yet there are still fish in it! You can see them swim to the surface from time to time.

The Army Corp of Engineers has debated for over the last 20 years on how in the world they are going to dredge the toxic witch`s brew from the bottom and not contaminate the lower half of Lake Michigan, not to mention how or where to store the millions of tons of poisoned muck. So you should not be suprised at what fish could live in.

52 posted on 04/04/2003 4:12:58 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson