To: #1CTYankee
Nothing to see here folks, please move along...
2 posted on
04/04/2003 9:23:25 AM PST by
adam_az
To: #1CTYankee
Hollow shells? Hmmmm. In a way, it would be better if the British found the WMD..
3 posted on
04/04/2003 9:24:40 AM PST by
Paradox
To: #1CTYankee
Little old Hans Blix is certainly quiet these days. Where are the reporters who should be swarming him for answers?
6 posted on
04/04/2003 9:26:18 AM PST by
EggsAckley
(Midnight at the Oasis......)
To: #1CTYankee
Talk about shooting blanks...
To: #1CTYankee
Meanwhile, at the Burger King, Scottie Ritter is exposing himself to little girls.
21 posted on
04/04/2003 9:32:04 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Send Al Sharpton 5 bucks so he can wreak havoc in his party)
To: #1CTYankee
To: #1CTYankee
You gotta love the Royal Fusiliers.
To: #1CTYankee
How do you hide 56 missiles?
To: #1CTYankee
bttt
43 posted on
04/05/2003 12:52:37 AM PST by
ellery
To: #1CTYankee; MadIvan
Reports here quoted military sources as saying that the Royal Fusiliers found short-range ballistic missiles near Al Zubayr. According to the sources, "These posed a significant threat to coalition forces and we have called in our explosives ordnance disposal team." Also near Al Zubayr, 42 Commando gained control of a fertiliser plant where they discovered chemicals and hollow shells.
I wonder where the Iraqis would have gotten such shells. Probably from the Shell store, I reckon.
45 posted on
04/05/2003 1:14:48 PM PST by
archy
(Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
