[Dane]

Using someone as a human shield puts them at risk; how do pro-pot legalizers put medical patients at risk?

I answered it.

That is a clear lie

Uh no it is not. The premise of a human shield is too use an innocent person to further your political goals.

Call me a liar all you want, I really don't care if you want to revel in your disingenuousness, but it has been pointed out that pro-pot groups use the misery of innocent humans to shield themselves from criticism of furthering their ultimate political goals.

[eno_]

The question was how this puts any patient at risk. Plainly it does not.

[jmc813]

Why is it so bad to support both medical and recreational pot? Liberals use the same type of arguments as you when they claim that "conservatives only want a partial-birth abortion ban in order to set the way for banning all abortions". Think about it.

[MrLeRoy]

Using someone as a human shield puts them at risk; how do pro-pot legalizers put medical patients at risk?

I answered it.

That is a clear lie

Uh no it is not. The premise of a human shield is too use an innocent person to further your political goals.

And the largest part of what makes the "human shield" strategy as practiced on the battlefield so repugnant is that innocents are put at risk---which point you have yet to address rather than squirm away from.