Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Leaders Press Ehrlich To Veto Medical Marijuana
Baltimore Sun ^ | April 4, 2003 | Tim Craig

Posted on 04/04/2003 8:18:29 AM PST by Wolfie

GOP Leaders Press Ehrlich To Veto Medical Marijuana

The Bush administration and other top national Republicans are heavily pressuring Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. to veto a proposal that would drastically reduce penalties for terminally ill patients who smoke marijuana to ease pain.

In recent days, several Republican officials have urged Ehrlich to reconsider his longtime support of medical marijuana, which has become one of the few issues that divide the state GOP.

Rest of article here.

(Excerpt) Read more at sunspot.net ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: addicts; drugwar; drugwarnazis; harryanslinger; jackbootedthugs; medicalmarijuana; reefermadness; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-259 next last
To: Dane
Using someone as a human shield puts them at risk; how do pro-pot legalizers put medical patients at risk?

I answered it.

That is a clear lie

Uh no it is not. The premise of a human shield is too use an innocent person to further your political goals.

And the largest part of what makes the "human shield" strategy as practiced on the battlefield so repugnant is that innocents are put at risk---which point you have yet to address rather than squirm away from.

101 posted on 04/04/2003 11:58:13 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
"Though cannabis was widely cultivated in America for three hundred years, both as a fiber resource and for its medicinal properties, its use as an intoxicant was rare until the beginning of the twentieth century."

So its use as an intoxicant today should be illegal because it was historically rare, but its use as a medicine today should be illegal although it was historically widespread. Got it.

102 posted on 04/04/2003 12:03:48 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Thankfully most of these guys are on the downhill side of the age curve. Most Republicans that are under 60, don't drive a Buick, don't wear Sanz-a-Belt slacks, etc. also don't buy into the Drug War.

And most Republicans under 60, burn 'em when they can get 'em.

103 posted on 04/04/2003 12:03:58 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
They care about sick people getting cannabis about as much as they care about anyone else overdosing on legalized heroin, which is to say, not at all.

I care about both---the former more than the latter. Your baseless ad hominem is duly noted.

104 posted on 04/04/2003 12:05:45 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: eno_
The Drug War has had a really bad effect on pain management. If you want to loosen restrictions on prescription narcotic pain meds, abuse may rise. Perhaps it is inevitable that abuse does rise.

An unusual admission from a pottie that abuse will rise upon the removal of restrictions that are meant to prevent a society full of stay-at-homers and street bums who can't keep a job.

105 posted on 04/04/2003 12:06:52 PM PST by A2J (Those who truly understand peace know that its father is War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Oxycontin doesn't need to be injected.

Neither does heroin.

106 posted on 04/04/2003 12:07:52 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Lysander
the pro- pot legalizers use medical patients as their human shields.

Exactly.

And you guys shoot them anyway?

LOL! That's how they express their outrage at the use of human shields.

107 posted on 04/04/2003 12:10:08 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
And the largest part of what makes the "human shield" strategy as practiced on the battlefield so repugnant is that innocents are put at risk---which point you have yet to address rather than squirm away from

Actually some of the human shields in Iraq are there voluntarily.

But like I stated many times before the concept of a human shield is a political one.

In your case you shield yourself behind innocent sick humans to promote your ultimate political goal of making the drug culture validated.

108 posted on 04/04/2003 12:12:50 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
So I'm with CJ; focusing on pot legalization is bad policy.

I must respectfully disagree. Despite the fact that pot possession is no big deal legally in CA, the fact remains that over 700,000 Americans nationwide are arrested on MJ charges annually. When you consider the sheer level of (taxpayer-funded) effort expended to arrest and prosecute that many marijuana "offenders" (even if they never go to jail), it's pretty damned significant.

And it's never a good idea to affirm the existence of a black market, with all its violent attributes: consider the effect of Prohibition on crime rates in the 1920's, and consider the continued effect of the WOD on our inner cities. No matter how you cut it, prohibition is a public policy disaster.

109 posted on 04/04/2003 12:18:41 PM PST by bassmaner (Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Dane
But like I stated many times before the concept of a human shield is a political one.

Your saying it doesn't make it so; you're rhetorically appealing to people's repugnance at endangering innocents without factual justification---or the honesty to admit that you're doing so.

For shame.

110 posted on 04/04/2003 12:20:04 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Your saying it doesn't make it so; you're rhetorically appealing to people's repugnance at endangering innocents without factual justification---or the honesty to admit that you're doing so.

Huh? I am not the one shielding myself behind innocent human suffering to promote a wider political agenda of validating the drug culture.

Like I said I am for the concept of medical marijuana, not your agenda of validating the drug culture.

111 posted on 04/04/2003 12:23:30 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Actually, the innocents are put at risk BY THE WAR ON AMERICANS called a war on some drugs. They deny or restrict the use of certain drugs/medications because someone, somewhere might use it for recreation. If ANYONE is using the sick as human shields it is, by definition, the DRUG WARRIORS. Who, by the way, are the human scum who never had what it takes to become REAL policemen... They are our equivalent of Uday's feyadeen stormtroopers. I only wonder when they will feel the "need" to use chemical or bio weapons in their holy quest...
112 posted on 04/04/2003 12:25:42 PM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
I'll take Option B, bag the DEA.

If any drugs should be proscribed and forbidden, it's not the organics, but the bath-tub crank and other chemicals.

I mean, mushrooms and ditchweed, illegal? This just makes the government look silly.

I prefer to respect the government, but they do make it difficult.
113 posted on 04/04/2003 12:25:43 PM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Dane
you're rhetorically appealing to people's repugnance at endangering innocents without factual justification---or the honesty to admit that you're doing so.

Huh? I am not the one shielding myself behind innocent human suffering to promote a wider political agenda of validating the drug culture.

But you are rhetorically appealing to people's repugnance at endangering innocents, without factual justification---or the honesty to admit that you're doing so.

And I'm not shielding anything; even if I were to be persuaded that recreational marijuana use should be illegal, I would continue to support the legality of medical marijuana.

114 posted on 04/04/2003 12:26:41 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The needle is one reason most people will stay away from heroin.

Your stupidity is showing. Many people snort and smoke heroin. Also many people are "Chippers," using only occasionally. It is only slightly more addictive than nicotine or caffein.

115 posted on 04/04/2003 12:28:44 PM PST by Lysander (Support our Mercenaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
And I'm not shielding anything; even if I were to be persuaded that recreational marijuana use should be illegal, I would continue to support the legality of medical marijuana

You are, IMO. You and pro-pot organizations shield yourselves by feigning sympathy on the suffering of innocents while your true symapthy lies with your wider and ultimate agenda.

Total drug validation.

116 posted on 04/04/2003 12:32:57 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
They are our equivalent of Uday's feyadeen stormtroopers

You nailed them! If they really cared about the harms drugs cause they would see that most of the harm is from drugs being illegal, expensive and against the law. Sending kids to crime college for drug use is doing more harm than good. Drug addiction is an illness yet they want to lock 'em up!

117 posted on 04/04/2003 12:32:58 PM PST by Lysander (Support our Mercenaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Huh? I am not the one shielding myself behind innocent human suffering to promote a wider political agenda of validating the drug culture.

Do you support repealing the 21st Amendment, and returning to the days of moonshine, speakeasys, and Al Capone? After all, ending Prohibition validated the "alcohol culture", didn't it?

The "drug culture", as you describe it, started long before the 1960's: it started in the 1930's, with the first generation of Americans that relied on the welfare state for assorted and sundry government handouts. Marijuana isn't the enemy - socialism is.

118 posted on 04/04/2003 12:33:20 PM PST by bassmaner (Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Dane
And I'm not shielding anything; even if I were to be persuaded that recreational marijuana use should be illegal, I would continue to support the legality of medical marijuana

You and pro-pot organizations shield yourselves by feigning sympathy on the suffering of innocents

Read much? It's not feigned.

119 posted on 04/04/2003 12:35:09 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
They are our equivalent of Uday's feyadeen stormtroopers.

Get some help, seriously. I think that your paranoid delusions are taking over your life.

120 posted on 04/04/2003 12:35:24 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson