1 posted on
04/04/2003 6:15:44 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: kattracks
You mean Hans Blix was wrong all this time?
2 posted on
04/04/2003 6:16:40 AM PST by
ewing
To: kattracks
Its good to know that MSNBC is testing all the suspected toxic material for us. ?!?!?
3 posted on
04/04/2003 6:17:11 AM PST by
MrFred
To: kattracks
But now we will be right and the rest of the world will be wrong... I shall be so ashamed... </sarcasm>
4 posted on
04/04/2003 6:18:30 AM PST by
LurkedLongEnough
(Five day forecast for Baghdad: 2 days)
To: kattracks
I'm glad this didn't come from an embedded reporter for Fox News! Maybe the public will believe MSNBC!
5 posted on
04/04/2003 6:19:12 AM PST by
Magnolia
To: kattracks
Yes but you know they will say that the Coalition planted them.
6 posted on
04/04/2003 6:19:28 AM PST by
sarasota
To: kattracks
Yes but... you know what the Saddamites will claim. "That area was not under the control of Saddam"
7 posted on
04/04/2003 6:19:44 AM PST by
rhombus
To: kattracks
At this moment, Peter Jennings is working on the time-line to explain that the US troops brought these materials into Iraq and planted them to incriminate the Iraqi's.
8 posted on
04/04/2003 6:21:04 AM PST by
TexasNative2000
(The joy of the Lord is my strength)
To: kattracks
MSNBC should not be doing any tests for chemical/biological weapons since it would make them a participant rather than an observer of the war.
To: kattracks
But, but these folks were not friends of Saddam, they never exchanged xmas gifts. How could we hold someone responsible even if he didn't cooperate with the world community to remove WMD ?
11 posted on
04/04/2003 6:22:24 AM PST by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: kattracks
Is there any significant difference about the chem/bio materials being in Northern Iraq? I heard propaganda saying that was not in SH's reign. Any input?
16 posted on
04/04/2003 6:24:43 AM PST by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: kattracks
NO WAY! But it doesn't matter it is in the NORTH, Sadaam doesn't control the north, as we all know, and it is in the Terrorist camp that everyone KNOWS isn't there. </sarcasm>
19 posted on
04/04/2003 6:29:36 AM PST by
PISANO
To: kattracks
Kofi the War Kriminal will have some excuse for his buddy Saddam and his chemicals
20 posted on
04/04/2003 6:31:16 AM PST by
UCFRoadWarrior
(Stop Anti-American Bigotry......Ignore Hollywood And The Liberal Media)
To: kattracks
Difficult to believe
21 posted on
04/04/2003 6:32:48 AM PST by
The Toad
To: kattracks
Great, now we can drop all of those WMD that don't exist on Paris.
22 posted on
04/04/2003 6:32:56 AM PST by
kenzie
(Syria, Iran, N. Korea and Libya are next!!)
To: kattracks
I think I'll wait for the CIA report, instead of believing some While-U-Wait doodad Preston Mendenhall bought off some web site.
25 posted on
04/04/2003 6:35:23 AM PST by
Timesink
(When was the last time YOU remembered we're on Code Orange?)
To: kattracks
Hans and France whats up?
Are you pumped up?
To: kattracks
(From the same article) And in France, police are on alert after recently finding traces of ricin in flasks in a train station locker in Paris.
**This is most likely Chiraqi's stash! I wonder who the French will turn to now?? North Korea? :-)
To: kattracks
Can't be. CNN reporting that it was just ammo powder. Now....who do we believe....MSNBC....CNN....Al Jezeera....Iraqi tv....too many choices!
39 posted on
04/04/2003 6:52:04 AM PST by
Magnolia
To: kattracks
But, but.....I thought they said there was no evidence of WMD.
To: kattracks
Whoda thunk it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson