Posted on 04/04/2003 5:02:15 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
Conservatives have spent years battling to prevent our country from becoming part of the Kyoto Protocol, which would essentially force energy rationing on the American people.
Even though President Clinton signed the treaty in 1998, it has yet to be ratified by the United States Senate. It would be comforting to think that the treaty is really dead and buried for the next few years because the Bush administration is in power. But it stands a good chance of being resurrected in the energy bill currently being considered by the United States Senate.
The GOP has its own greens, and one of them is a Senate staffer who is said to be promoting Kyoto in all but name by fashioning this legislation. This Senate aide may soon turn up at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue as a staffer for the Council on Environmental Quality, advising President Bush on climate issues. But there is every reason to hope that the Senate Energy bill containing his handiwork never reaches President Bush's desk.
The Kyoto Protocol is not specifically mentioned in the Energy Bill, instead the measures that would set up the framework to implement the Kyoto bill are grouped together in a section innocuously called "Title XI."
These provisions would require a national strategy to "stabilize and over time reduce U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases" and the reestablishment of an office within the White House for a climate czar.
Creating such an office and position runs the very real danger of setting up a lobbying operation and national spokesperson for slow growth energy policies, each bearing the official stamp of the White House. The legislation also provides credits to big business for taking early action to reduce emissions, thus giving large corporations a carrot to buy into the plan.
This is exactly the kind of measure that conservatives would have expected to come from the Senate last year when Tom Daschle and the liberals were in charge. Or we could expect a measure like this to be promoted by a `green' administration, particularly if either Senator John Kerry (D-MA) or Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) is elected president in 2004.
Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, who has been a tireless fighter against the Kyoto Protocol, puts it this way: "Politically the climate title [of the Senate Energy Bill] looks like a Kerry or Lieberman campaign document."
There is a huge grassroots network out in the states that fought against Kyoto and it remains to be seen if it can be reactivated in time to force the Energy and Natural Resources Committee to strip these onerous provisions from the Energy Bill. If not, the bill will be sent to the Senate floor and, if passed, will wind up in conference.
That could give conservatives a good second opportunity to set this bill right. If it winds up on President Bush's desk with Title XI's measures, let us hope that he will veto it.
It's important to realize that more than just bad science is driving the advocates of the Kyoto Protocol.
Some of the biggest proponents of Kyoto have a vested interest in halting U.S. economic growth. The European Union, for instance, has placed plenty of strictures on their own countries when it comes to welfare and labor policies that brake the dynamism of their economies.
Slowing down our country's more vigorous economic growth is part of their own unstated strategy to ensure their economic competitiveness in the international marketplace. Third World countries have their eyes set on enticing industry from the United States to relocate. The emissions caps on industrial countries can help them to accomplish that goal.
One thing conservatives need to realize is that having the Republicans control the White House and the Congress does not mean the world has been made safe from liberalism. There are still plenty of liberal opportunists, even some working within the GOP, searching for opportunities to turn their ideas into official policy.
The wrangling over the Senate Energy Bill is just the most notable one at the moment, and it is one, given its far-reaching implications, that must be stopped. If conservatives can muster the strength to have the bill stripped of its generic brand Kyoto Protocol measures, then it will be an important win for conservatives that can help to ensure the integrity of our victories in 2000 and 2002 and keep our base united as an election year draws closer.
If not, it will certainly be bad for the economy of our country and force us to divert time and resources spent making things right on an issue we thought we had won in 2000 when Al Gore lost the presidency. We could use that time better advancing our own policies on other important issues.
I guess it just goes to show that "keep your guard up" is good advice even when we control the White House and Congress.
(Paul M. Weyrich is chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.)
Free Congress Foundation
indexing
Related Articles Global Warming: The Perversion of Science
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 24, 2003; Author: Alan CarubaEnvironmental Says Blizzard Consistent with 'Global Warming' Trend
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 20, 2003; Author: Marc MoranoGreen Wealth: Funding the Enemy
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 13, 2003; Author: Alan CarubaThe Nature Conservancy's "outrageous contradictions and sad lies"
Source: AllSouthwest News Service; Published: February 12, 2003; Author: Jay Zane WalleyThe green scare machine - (Whatever the topic,... alarmist rhetoric the rule)
Source: The Orange County Register; Published: January 26, 2003; Author: Charli Coon - Energy & Environmental Analyst - Heritage FoundationGlobal climate has always fluctuated: Rusher discredits 'alarmists' who ignore earth's history
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: January 16, 2003; Author: William RusherEnvironment and Science: Danes Rebuke a 'Skeptic' (anti-environmentalism author vaguely rebuked)
Source: New York Times Published: January 7, 2003; Author: Andrew C. RevkinScientists discover global warming linked to increase in tropopause height over past two decades
Source: Space Daily; Published: January 5, 2003Global Warming Found to Displace Species
Source: New York Times; Published: January 3, 2003; Author: Andrew RevkinJust a Climate Cowboy (Bush & Kyoto)
Source:Tech Central Station; Published: 29 August 2002; Author: Duane D. FreeseCrying wolf once again! Henry Lamb exposes newest tactics to control America
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: August 31, 2002; Author:| Henry LambWarming Up to the Truth: The Real Story About Climate Chang
Source: The Heritage Foundation; Published: 22 August 2002; Author: Sallie BaliunaOur Burning Forests Are The Legacy Of Radical Environmentalism
Source: TooGood Reports; Published: June 26, 2002; Author: Mary MostertHomegrown Terrorism
Source: Ayn Rand Institute; Published: April 16, 2002; Author: Elan JournoA LOOK AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES AND "GLOBAL WARMING"
Source: Intellicast.com; Published: April 9, 2003; Author: Joe D'AleoThe Good News About Bad Green Lies
Source: CNSNews.com commentary from the Nation Anxiety Center; Published: April 8, 2002; Author: Alan CarubaThe Terrorist Tactics of Radical Environmentalists
Source: INSIGHT magazine: Published: April 1, 2002; Author: Sean HigginsENTER THE JAGUAR - THE LATEST SONORAN DESERT CONSERVATION GAMBIT
Source: AZCorruption.comPublished: March 5, 2002; Author: Tim Serey, PhD.PETA Under Attack for Funding Alleged Eco-Terrorists
Source: CNSNews.com; published March 8, 2002; Author: Jason PierceWake Up, America
[re:Huntingdon Life Sciences/SHAC/ Animal Liberation Front (ALF), Earth Lib FR- ELF]
Source: Consumer Freedom.com; Published: March 4, 2002;The Terrorists You Don't Hear About [re: Animal Liberation Front (ALF), Earth Liberation Front (ELF)]
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 04, 2002; Author: Tom DeWeeseBiologists conspired to submit fake {LYNX} fur
Source: Elko Daily FREE Press; Published: March 3, 2002; Author: JEFFRY MULLINSCabin owners 'deeply alarmed' by forest plan
Source: The Sacramento Bee; Published: March 1, 2002; Author: Evelyn de Ghetaldi and Liz ArnoldSkeptics denounce climate science 'lie'
Source: BBC News; Published: February 25, 2002; Author: Alex KirbyNew Research Indicates the Earth May Be Cooling
Source:: The National Center for Public Policy Research; Published: February 2002:
Author: Amy Ridenour President of The National Center for Public Policy ResearchFBI: Left Wing Green Terrorists the most active terror organization in the U.S
Source: The Sierra Times; Published: February 13, 2002; Author: J.J. JohnsonNewfangled 'Fish Protection' Religion Debunked --"Greens" Motive To Bankrupt Oregon Farmers
Source: Toogood reports: Published: February 11, 2002: Author: Vin SuprynowiczConnecting the Dots in the Case of the Missing Canadian Lynx
Source: NewsMax.com: Published: Feb. 7, 2002; Author; Diane AldenScientific findings run counter to theory of global warming
Source: San Diego Union Tribune; Published 1/25/2002; Author: Joseph PerkinsSenate Betrayal Creates Son of CARA Monster (re: Conservation and Reinvestment Act )
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: January 29, 2002; Author: Tom DeWeeseNaked Greens
Source: FrontPageMag.com Published: January 23, 2002; Author: Lowell PonteThe US Does Not Need a National Climate Service
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: January 16, 2002; Author: Alan CarubaEnvironmental Corruption: A Cascade of Lies
Source: Commentary from the National Anxiety Center; Published: January 07, 2002; Author: Alan CarubaFeds help fund green activists
Source: The Elko Daily Free Press; Published: 8 January, 2002; Author: JEFFRY MULLINS"Findings" vs. "Facts" In Washington (re: Global Climate Change Act of 2001/2)
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: December 12, 2001; Author: Patrick J. MichaelsThe Heart of Amazonia
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: November 29, 2001; Author: Marc MoranoTimber Industry Warns of 'Eco-Dictatorship'
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: November 27, 2001; Author: Marc MoranoCollectivist Greens Must Use Coercion Enforced By The Central State
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: November 20, 2001; Author: Vin SuprynowiczDon't forget to attack domestic terrorism, too
Source: The Oregonian; Published: November 19, 2001; Author: Nick NicholsEnvironmental Terrorists Also Oppose Civilization
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published: November 13, 2001; Author: Mary MostertThe Last Word : environmentalist; saboteurs
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: November 9, 2001; Author: Ralph de ToledanoHave the Muslim Terrorists Merged with Environmental Terrorists?
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published: November 9, 2001; Author: Mary MostertRadical Environmentalists Eyed After Discovery Of Bombs On Michigan Campus...
Source: DrudgeReport;; Author: Paul PertersonEnvironmental Radicals Not Slowed
Source: AP via The New York Times; Published: November 6, 2001Environmental Terrorists Deserve No Special Treatment
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: October 26, 2001; Author: Christopher C. HornerThe EcoTerrorist Anthrax Connection
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: October 23, 2001; Author: Tom DeWeeseThe Tragic Cost of Environmentalism
Source: Ever Vigilant.net; Published: August 7, 2001; Author: Lee SheltonNew Breed of Environmental Activists has Research Officials Bracing for Vandalism
Source: Pesticide Education Program at Penn State; Published: July 16, 2001; Author: St. Louis Post-DispatchThe Reality of 'Global Warming'
Source: NewsMax.com; Published: June 13, 2001; Author: Rep. Dana RohrabacherCalifornias Power Crisis - a natural result of rampant Environmentalism
Source: Original Sources; Published: December 27, 2000; Author: Author:Mary Mostert (www.originalsources.com)The Something Undermining Our Nation
Source: WorldNetDaily; Published: March 19, 1999; Author: Holly Swanson
Meanwhile....back at the ranch.
International investors want bigger profits for betraying the American worker who developed the processes they wish to export. The American taxpayer then foots the bill for "retraining," unemployment, unfunded pensions, and a war machine that guarantees delivery of those imported goods upon which this nation would then be economically dependent. The process socializes the risk to their investments.
Please don't think that such a bill is DOA. Investors who wish to see such an outcome contribute to both political parties. It's fascism.
That's what I thought about our borders being closed.
Sure, windpower is cool, especially if you're somewhere that there's always a breeze. For the rest of us... Windmills are cool, but not practical. They don't satisfy the environmental radicals anyway - they disrupt birds and aren't natural.
Should Kerry or Lieberman be elected, hell will have frozen over achieving cloture on the global warming debate.
Note: evidence now shows the Middle Ages were much warmer, yet few knights drove SUVs.
Let those who resurrect the ghost of Kyoto be driven from the capital with methane blasts.
Understatement of the year.
Slowing down our country's more vigorous economic growth is part of their own unstated strategy to ensure their economic competitiveness in the international marketplace. Third World countries have their eyes set on enticing industry from the United States to relocate. The emissions caps on industrial countries can help them to accomplish that goal.
Thank God we have a Republican President and Republican Congress. We'd be doing pretty badly had Gore been in power.
The extreme enviro radicals that want us to all wear tie died cloths and live in hay houses represent about a few thousand people but the vast majority of people who are the least bit energy conscience love the idea of wind power. They have about a 75-90 percent acceptance where they are installed, and that is quite a few places.
Some of the first windmills that were installed in California turned out to be sited in the worlds premium raptor habitat. They are much more careful about where they put them now. The new windmills are much bigger and on much taller towers. The towers are tublar instead of latice towers which keeps the birds away. The bird mortality, even in dense bird populations, is about 1/4 as high with the same number of megawatts of windmills.
BTW how many birds do you suppose are killed by cars and trucks and power lines and polution. Windpower favors birds in the long run because it is clean.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.