Skip to comments.
Kerry: America needs
a 'regime change' too
The Union Leader, Manchester, NH ^
| 4/3/03
| STEPHEN SEITZ
Posted on 04/03/2003 4:03:44 AM PST by RJCogburn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
We need not only a regime change in Iraq, but also in the United States.Well, I realize it is just political rhetoric, but this statement is in poor taste, IMO.
News from the first, and most important primary state.
1
posted on
04/03/2003 4:03:44 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
To: RJCogburn
We need not only a regime change in Iraq, but also in the United States. That's crossing the line just a bit.
To: Carbonsteel
We need not only a regime change in Iraq, but also in the United States. Whatever comes in '04, this president did not kick the can down the road for another to deal with later.
3
posted on
04/03/2003 4:11:05 AM PST
by
mware
To: RJCogburn
Sen Lieberman tells donors: " I know how to beat Bush. Al Gore and I did in 2000.
![](http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/865000/images/_869652_lieberman150.jpg)
"Kerry's a nothing. I got the hyphenated-American vote locked up, for God's sake. My grandfather, Senor Shaquille OLiebermanelli Fu Ching changed his name. I claim Irish, Latino, Black, Mediterranean, and Oriental voting blocs...er, I mean, roots."
" A donation of $10 grand gets you a ticket to my Hyphenated-American Pander Party. Help yourself to corned beef burritos, pastrami Egg Fu Yung, grits in Marinara sauce, vintage Manishevitz, and oregano bagels stuffed with teriyaki-glazed ham, chitlins and chili peppers."
4
posted on
04/03/2003 4:11:38 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Carbonsteel
"We need not only a regime change in Iraq, but also in the United States". You're absolutely right "Ketchup Boy", we need to vote all of you RATS out of office.
5
posted on
04/03/2003 4:13:26 AM PST
by
anoldafvet
(Duty, Honor, Country: God Bless the U.S.A.)
To: Liz
Lol, do you write comedy?
6
posted on
04/03/2003 4:16:52 AM PST
by
csvset
To: RJCogburn
the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision in its selection The U.S. Supreme Court made no selection. They stopped the recount. If Kerry can't get this straight he has no business running for President.
7
posted on
04/03/2003 4:17:40 AM PST
by
Flyer
(We Own The Streets!!)
To: RJCogburn
This is the latest "throw-something-against-the-wall-and-see-if-it-sticks" strategy from the Dems. "I support the war, but AFTER the war we need to get rid of the 'regime' that caused the war (i.e., Bush)."
This will be no more successful than the rest, but it is an interesting iteration of "I support the troops, but hate the President."
8
posted on
04/03/2003 4:18:04 AM PST
by
LS
To: LS
Just because the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision in its selection, and an error in its decision in the year 2000, doesnt mean we have to live with it for six more years,
I suppose this plays to the democratic base, which is where Kerry should be aiming now, but if they're dumb enough to play this '04 election itself this way, they're gonna lose big. People as a whole are tired of this line.
9
posted on
04/03/2003 4:22:15 AM PST
by
HarryCaul
To: Liz
LOL Bump! That's great!
To: LS
From the article, he messes up the Supreme Court decision but I don't see where he said that "regime change" was needed. I think Kerry knows that those exact words would be overstepping acceptable bounds.
But one thing about Kerry, the man is UG-LEE. Understand, I don't care about someone's looks, and I never understood the fascination with Kennedy, but Kerry is NOT someone you can picture delivering TV addresses or States of the Union.
I just don't picture it, not at all. NOT EVER.
11
posted on
04/03/2003 4:24:45 AM PST
by
Skywalk
To: RJCogburn
Poor taste? I'll go one better... for this spineless, big-haired, no-nuts moron to make a statement like that now, demonstrates precisely why he doesn't have what it takes to be the President. We had one President that lacked any character or conviction (slick willie). I think most Americans are happy having a president they can be proud of.
12
posted on
04/03/2003 4:28:11 AM PST
by
Cicero5
To: RJCogburn
Yes Yes Mr. Kerry 9-11 would have happened and President Al Gore would still be standing around holding his finger to the air to see what way the winds of world opinion would be blowing and Saddam woulds still have WMD, the UN would run the US and the Israelis would have their backs to the ocean, while Americans would have to put up with 3 dollars a gallon gas prices, a recession, Hollywood A-Types voiceingf their corrupt political view and the US Military under UN/NATO Command. Thank God the Surpemes stopped this nightmare.
To: RJCogburn
Some people are worried about having a President without a prostate, he said. The problem is, weve had too many Republican Presidents without a heart.
MAJOR BARF!!!!
14
posted on
04/03/2003 4:30:40 AM PST
by
Fraulein
To: RJCogburn
Kerry had prostate cancer surgery earlier this year, and said his health was fine. Kerry reminds me of Paul Tsongas.
15
posted on
04/03/2003 4:31:56 AM PST
by
palmer
(ohmygod this bulldozer is like, really heavy?)
To: RJCogburn
We need not only a regime change in Iraq, but also in the United StatesWe are in the middle of a regime change. The Democratic Crime Syndicate, like Saddam, is being relegated to the ash heap of history. The mission statement of FreeRepublic is reason for the former. The mission statement of President Bush is reason for the latter.
16
posted on
04/03/2003 4:32:24 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: Liz
Hyphenated - American Pander Party.....thats funny!
17
posted on
04/03/2003 4:35:15 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: RJCogburn
This President failed. It was a failure of diplomacy, he said. We need not only a regime change in Iraq, but also in the United States.Nope. The prior president failed us all in a spectacular way. For Kerry to say this at this time is disgusting. He not only resembles Herman Munster, he apparently as the same mental capacity.
To: csvset
Only when I'm confronted with fatuous politicians like Kerry and LIEberman.
19
posted on
04/03/2003 4:40:09 AM PST
by
Liz
To: mware
Excellent point! I was telling everyone who would listen in 2000 that whoever won the election was going to have one tall task cleaning up all of Clinton's messes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson