To: RJCogburn
This is the latest "throw-something-against-the-wall-and-see-if-it-sticks" strategy from the Dems. "I support the war, but AFTER the war we need to get rid of the 'regime' that caused the war (i.e., Bush)."
This will be no more successful than the rest, but it is an interesting iteration of "I support the troops, but hate the President."
8 posted on
04/03/2003 4:18:04 AM PST by
LS
To: LS
Just because the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision in its selection, and an error in its decision in the year 2000, doesnt mean we have to live with it for six more years,
I suppose this plays to the democratic base, which is where Kerry should be aiming now, but if they're dumb enough to play this '04 election itself this way, they're gonna lose big. People as a whole are tired of this line.
9 posted on
04/03/2003 4:22:15 AM PST by
HarryCaul
To: LS
From the article, he messes up the Supreme Court decision but I don't see where he said that "regime change" was needed. I think Kerry knows that those exact words would be overstepping acceptable bounds.
But one thing about Kerry, the man is UG-LEE. Understand, I don't care about someone's looks, and I never understood the fascination with Kennedy, but Kerry is NOT someone you can picture delivering TV addresses or States of the Union.
I just don't picture it, not at all. NOT EVER.
11 posted on
04/03/2003 4:24:45 AM PST by
Skywalk
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson