Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Forces Drive Within Sight of Baghdad
AP | Wednesday, April 2, 2003 | By RAVI NESSMAN and ELLEN KNICKMEYER

Posted on 04/02/2003 4:55:50 PM PST by JohnHuang2

U.S. Forces Drive Within Sight of Baghdad

By RAVI NESSMAN and ELLEN KNICKMEYER .c The Associated Press

SOUTH OF BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - U.S. forces fought to within sight of the Baghdad skyline 20 miles away Wednesday, seizing key bridges and shattering two divisions of the vaunted Republican Guard as they thrust north from two directions - the Army from the southwest, Marines from the southeast.

Along the way, some Iraqi soldiers shed their uniforms for plain robes, and smiling civilians proffered the troops Iraqi-brand cigarettes.

``It feels better going north,'' said Marine Cpl. John Edwards of Clovis, N.M. ``The sooner we do it, the sooner we go home.''

Thousands of Marines who had protected the U.S. Army's eastern flank along the Euphrates River turned sharply east, joining other Marine forces moving quickly along the Tigris River southeast of Baghdad. At the same time, Army troops southwest of Baghdad moved to within 20 miles of the city, said a senior military official in Washington.

``Our guys are able to see the skyline. That's how close we've gotten,'' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

But confidence over the steady northward advance was tempered by fear of the unknown: What does Saddam Hussein's regime have in store for coalition forces as they approach the capital?

Lead U.S. infantry units donned their chemical suits after capturing a bridge 40 miles southwest of Baghdad. Some Marines began adding their protective boots to the suits they already wear, and Marine helicopter pilots were advised for the first time to be ready to don chemical suits at a moment's notice - now that the so-called red zone, the range of guns and missiles defending Baghdad, has been breached.

U.S. officials warned that a cornered Saddam might resort to unleashing his worst weapons. ``There may be a trigger line where the regime deems (a) sufficient threat to use weapons of mass destruction,'' said U.S. Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks.

An officer with U.S. Central Command explained that the ``red zone'' begins on an imaginary line running east from Karbala, about 50 miles south of Baghdad on the Euphrates River, to Kut on the Tigris River southeast of Baghdad.

The United States believes Iraq has mortar shells, artillery and short-range missiles capable of carrying chemical weapons, including the FROG-7 - used to carry mustard gas during the Iran-Iraq war - which has a 40-mile range.

Iraq denies it still has weapons of mass destruction, and U.S. troops have yet to locate such weapons, although they've found hundreds of chemical protective suits.

One thing was certain to be waiting for coalition forces in Baghdad: whatever remains of the Republican Guard, Saddam's best-trained and best-equipped forces. U.S. officials said Wednesday that two of the six primary units - the Medina armored division and the Baghdad infantry division - had been largely eliminated as an effective fighting force.

Four others are still somewhat intact, with two estimated at 70 percent effectiveness and two somewhat less, according to a defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

A spokesman for the Baghdad infantry division claimed that only 17 men had been killed and 35 injured since fighting began. He said the division was in excellent fighting shape and would teach the enemy ``lessons in the art of fighting.''

One sign of Iraqi disarray came in Numaniyah, 40 miles southeast of Baghdad, where Marines who took a key bridge over the Tigris River met little resistance and found the side of the road littered with abandoned Iraqi military uniforms.

``It looks like a lot of guys threw off their boots and threw off their uniforms and got the hell out,'' said Lt. Michael Belcher of the 5th Marine Regiment. One man tore off his Iraqi army uniform and donned a brown robe. They quickly seized him.

There were other signs that Iraqi forces had fled in a hurry. Soldiers found mortar ammunition, abandoned rifles, an unused artillery piece in a field.

As the Marines fanned out, Cobra and Huey helicopters flying overhead, civilians waved, some running away when the Marines drew close. Army teams drove through the town, using a loudspeaker to urge people, in Arabic, to remain indoors.

Beside a small marsh, Marines with bayonets fixed on their M-16 rifles stood over a group of 40 Iraqi men sitting on the ground. Four of the Iraqis had their hands bound with white cord.

Smoke rose from a building nearby. The bodies of three Iraqis lay on one side of the road, covered with blankets. Another body was on the other side of the road.

Lt. Belcher said the Marines uncovered ``weapons caches throughout the city.'' And, chillingly, Marines also found Iraqi gas masks still sealed in plastic and displays showing what to do in the event of a chemical or biological attack.

Elsewhere in central Iraq, somewhere between the cities of Diwaniyah and Kut, thousands of Marines headed out on a route so recently secured that at one spot, the bodies of four Iraqi soldiers were sprawled around their vehicle - which still had its engine running. It looked as if the vehicle had taken a hit from the air.

Heading north, the terrain was greener and lusher. Marines were entering towns, where in many cases they were greeted by Iraqi civilians smiling, waving and selling Iraqi-brand cigarettes.

Southeast of Baghdad, Marines seized the strategic town of Kut and routed the Baghdad division of the Republican Guard, guarding the highway to the capital. ``The Baghdad Division no longer exists, and the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force is moving on,'' said Navy Capt. Frank Thorp, a U.S. Central Command spokesman.

To the west, lead elements of the Army's 3rd Infantry Division pushed through a gap west of Karbala after a night-long bombardment of the Shiite holy city some 50 miles from Saddam's seat of power.

The division's First Brigade captured a bridge over the Euphrates River at Mussayib, about 40 miles southwest of Baghdad. The bridge had been rigged with explosives, but engineers defused them. Later, Army forces moved within 20 miles of the capital.

Eventually, the U.S.-led forces intend to launch a synchronized attack on Baghdad with the infantry, the Marines and the Air Force, said Thorp.

Their efforts could be hampered by the weather, with temperatures expected to climb into the 90s over the next several days.

In northwest Iraq, meanwhile, U.S. Special Forces and Kurdish Peshmerga fighters seized an Iraqi-held bridge 12 miles northeast of Mosul late Tuesday, when two Iraqi brigades were switching positions.

Although the Kurds consider the bridge part of their territory, they had not controlled it for 13 years.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: embeddedreport; groundassault; iraqifreedom; redzone; roadtobaghdad
Wednesday, April 2, 2003

Quote of the Day by The Wizard

1 posted on 04/02/2003 4:55:50 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A spokesman for the Baghdad infantry division...said the division was in excellent fighting cross-dressing shape and would teach the enemy ``lessons in the art of fighting quickly stripping off a military uniform and putting on an ordinary brown robe.''
2 posted on 04/02/2003 5:02:38 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Marines were entering towns, where in many cases they were greeted by Iraqi civilians smiling, waving and selling Iraqi-brand cigarettes.

Either they watch the news and heard that the Marines were out of cigarettes or this is like Nam where Vietnamese vendors would wait for GIs enroute their "secret" sweeps.

3 posted on 04/02/2003 5:02:55 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I was wondering. I am a vet, having served with an air cav squadron with the 101st in the early 70s. We had the latest choppers then. Why do the Marines have aged air equipment, cobras instead of apaches, hueys instead of blackhawks, etc? Any answers?

Mike

4 posted on 04/02/2003 5:03:03 PM PST by MichaelP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rotorhawk
Ping
5 posted on 04/02/2003 5:04:20 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Definite blam.
6 posted on 04/02/2003 5:17:49 PM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
i am a vietnam era Marine Corps combat vet. It has always been like that. The corps is the younger sister of the Army: always gets the "hand-me-downs". Ask any Marine.
Semper Fi !!!!
7 posted on 04/02/2003 5:26:50 PM PST by glf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
They keep putting all their money into "next generation" systems like Osprey. The price of replacing the CH-46s with -47s is prohibitive if they are going to fund Osprey. Ditto Sea Cobras with a salt water resistant Apache variant, ditto Seahawks.

Basically, they've been not too bright for a very long time.

Don't get the aircraft confused, though, the Sea Cobra is a much improved version of the Cobra. What they really need to bet rid of is the CH-46.
8 posted on 04/02/2003 5:30:43 PM PST by Abn1508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
We had the latest choppers then. Why do the Marines have aged air equipment, cobras instead of apaches, hueys instead of blackhawks, etc? Any answers?

Clinton. Peace dividend.

9 posted on 04/02/2003 5:51:37 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
Those Cobras are hot rods...they had major upgrades to the engines avionics and weapons systems..
They aint your daddys (or mine) Cobras anymore :)
10 posted on 04/02/2003 5:54:41 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
Do you think that the newer models have fewer accidents than the older models?

It seems that we just hear about Apaches and Blackhawks going down, but not the older models.

Just curious, since I'm not familiar with the history of these aircrafts.

11 posted on 04/02/2003 5:58:58 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
The newer helicopters are faster, and have heavier armament, better avionics and survivability. It isn't even close...

Mike

12 posted on 04/02/2003 6:05:03 PM PST by MichaelP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
Thanks for the explanation.

I just checked the Breaking News and there is another copter down.

God rest the souls of our brave pilots and support personnel.

13 posted on 04/02/2003 6:11:19 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson