Skip to comments.
Russia to send navy to Arabian Sea: report
ABC News ^
| 4/2/03
Posted on 04/02/2003 6:55:45 AM PST by areafiftyone
Russia is likely to send its navy to the Arabian Sea near the Gulf region where the United States is leading a war against Iraq, the newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta reports.
Russian navy officials had earlier announced that at least two fleets - the Pacific and the Black Sea, would stage exercises in the Indian Ocean next month.
However, there had previously been no mention of the Arabian Sea, which is on the Indian Ocean's northern tip and washes the shores of India, Iran, Oman and Yemen.
The newspaper, which has developed a reputation for its good military ties, reported that Black Sea fleet commander Yevgeny Orlov recently came to Moscow to receive instructions over the mission.
The paper said it was likely Commander Orlov received his orders not only from Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov but also from President Vladimir Putin.
It was not immediately clear how many vessels would take part in the exercises.
An official in the navy press service refused to confirm the report and said more detailed information about the mission might be released at a later date.
The Nezavisimaya Gazeta added Russia's strategic forces were put on heightened military alert following the March 20 launch of the war, which Russia has vigorously opposed.
The Russian military successfully launched a test intercontinental ballistic missile on March 27, but officials at the time stressed the exercise was not linked to Iraq.
Separately, Nezavisimaya Gazeta reported that Chief of Staff General Anatoly Kvashnin was in southern Russia to oversee the largest military exercises staged by the country's strategic air forces in 10 years.
"The unprecedented military activity confirms that Moscow is worried about the situation in Iraq," the newspaper wrote.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: arabiansea; iraqifreedom; navies; russia; russiannavy; shipmovement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: areafiftyone
Boy, I sure hope we cleared all those sea mines! (wink, wink)
To: areafiftyone
And they are positioning there for??? Intimidation? Show of support? Support for whom?
I can think of a many other REMOVED locations for 'excercises'.
3
posted on
04/02/2003 7:00:28 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: areafiftyone
So what's the plan?
4
posted on
04/02/2003 7:00:29 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: areafiftyone
"The unprecedented military activity confirms that Moscow is worried about the situation in Iraq," the newspaper wrote. What about France and their aircraft carrier?? Will tugboats need to push it to the region?
5
posted on
04/02/2003 7:00:32 AM PST
by
smith288
(Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
To: sarasota
More of annoyance and also to probably spy on us. They just can't get the KGB and the cold war out of their systems.
6
posted on
04/02/2003 7:02:09 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(God Bless George Bush and Tony Blair!)
To: Calpernia
If you think of Russia as a wounded male with a very, VERY sensitive ego, you'll understand. Our competence and success embarrasses them, and they need to make a face-saving gesture. Or perhaps they want to see what we do to the Russian advisors to the Iraquis...? We'll be capturing some, soon.
7
posted on
04/02/2003 7:04:08 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: areafiftyone
First, they have to make the voyage without breaking down.
8
posted on
04/02/2003 7:04:13 AM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
To: Mamzelle
>>>If you think of Russia as a wounded male with a very, VERY sensitive ego
ROFL!!!
But seriously, do you think they would step up to assisting us? Or Iraq? Economically, the world needs us. Iraq was easy, short term, quick bucks.
9
posted on
04/02/2003 7:07:12 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Calpernia
Assist us? Get real!
It is interesting that they feel a need to have their exercise THERE amidst all our ships and such.
10
posted on
04/02/2003 7:09:17 AM PST
by
ET(end tyranny)
(Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
To: areafiftyone
bump ... I hope someone in the Navy is keeping a pistol cocked a locked in that direction. Something about this says TRAP.
11
posted on
04/02/2003 7:09:31 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: ET(end tyranny)
I agree. I said the same thing in my post #3.
I just can't figure out to who they will be 'on hand' for.
12
posted on
04/02/2003 7:13:39 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Centurion2000
Yes, ambush does come to mind....But they're probably just going there to evacuate as many of the war criminals as possible from within Iraq. Hidden with their embassy staff.
13
posted on
04/02/2003 7:13:45 AM PST
by
11B3
(.308 holes make invisible souls. Belt fed liberal eraser.)
To: areafiftyone
Cool. The Navy needs some sea target practice.
14
posted on
04/02/2003 7:14:06 AM PST
by
LenS
To: TADSLOS
First, they have to make the voyage without breaking down. LOL!
We used to monitor the Soviets as they towed (that's right, towed their diesel boats (submarines) down through the Sea of Japan, to the Straights of Malacca before turning them loose into the Indian Ocean.
Supposedly they did this to make the passage faster and conserve fuel for the subs.
Or so we were told....
BWahahahahahaha!!!!!
To: Centurion2000
I don't suppose we have any spare ships that we could send off for excerises off Russia somewhere?? lol
16
posted on
04/02/2003 7:14:49 AM PST
by
ET(end tyranny)
(Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
To: areafiftyone
Sheesh. Now we'll have to send more rescue tugs.
To: areafiftyone
What shape is the Russian navy in after over a decade of neglect? The former Soviet ruler Leonid Breszhnev wanted the USSR to have a world class navy. Prior to Breszhnev, the Soviets focused on their submarine fleet in order to intercept the Atlantic sea lanes, much as the Germans had done in the two world wars. Even under Gorbachev, the USSR cut back on the blue water navy plans and focused again on submarines. In the post-Soviet era, the Russian military has suffered financial problems.
Their submarines may be a problem, but I would think that the combined force of the U.S. and Royal Navies could easily dispatch any Russian challenge.
To: Centurion2000
MY bet is they need to see just how a real military works,
unlike their attempt at Afghanistan, we rolled over the afghan's, and
are rolling over the Iraqi's military
So they want to see up close and personal,
just don't let them get to close, or we will sink the whole fleet.
19
posted on
04/02/2003 7:15:28 AM PST
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
To: Calpernia
you can bet, they are not on hand for us!!!!
20
posted on
04/02/2003 7:15:32 AM PST
by
ET(end tyranny)
(Heavenly Father, please embrace, and protect, our Pres., our troops and those of our true allies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson