Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Falcon4.0
Federal Jurisdiction and City ownership are two different things.

The FAA defines how airports shall operate. The FAAs jurisdiction was lost when the location ceased to be an airport.
34 posted on 04/01/2003 2:47:32 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol
If this was the willful destruction of FAA-regulated property, it seems that the Office of Homeland Security should be contacted, and investigation opened, and a criminal warrant be issued immediately for a Grand Jury hearing in the local district and federal courts. I'm not a lawyer, but speed is of the essence to preserve evidence, and yes I think it's fascism, ala Chritien.
38 posted on 04/01/2003 3:04:05 PM PST by Darheel (Visit the strange and wonderful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol
Yes, but interference of an airport is a violation isn't it? (i.e.) Destroying an active runway which is by law still open to aircraft without notifying the nearest Flight Service and or issuing a "Notice to Airman" (NOTAM).
Just asking. Please don't beat me?
39 posted on 04/01/2003 3:17:00 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson