To: Falcon4.0
Federal Jurisdiction and City ownership are two different things.
The FAA defines how airports shall operate. The FAAs jurisdiction was lost when the location ceased to be an airport.
To: taxcontrol
If this was the willful destruction of FAA-regulated property, it seems that the Office of Homeland Security should be contacted, and investigation opened, and a criminal warrant be issued immediately for a Grand Jury hearing in the local district and federal courts. I'm not a lawyer, but speed is of the essence to preserve evidence, and yes I think it's fascism, ala Chritien.
38 posted on
04/01/2003 3:04:05 PM PST by
Darheel
(Visit the strange and wonderful.)
To: taxcontrol
Yes, but interference of an airport is a violation isn't it? (i.e.) Destroying an active runway which is by law still open to aircraft without notifying the nearest Flight Service and or issuing a "Notice to Airman" (NOTAM).
Just asking. Please don't beat me?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson