[Falcon4.0]

Yes, but interference of an airport is a violation isn't it? (i.e.) Destroying an active runway which is by law still open to aircraft without notifying the nearest Flight Service and or issuing a "Notice to Airman" (NOTAM).
Just asking. Please don't beat me?

[taxcontrol]

See my #41.

Granted it would have been better for the airfield to first notify the FAA then take the runways out of commission.