Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rice Says Blueprint for Israel-Palestinian Settlement Is Not Negotiable
AP ^ | March 31, 2003 | AP

Posted on 03/31/2003 10:57:38 AM PST by ejdrapes

Rice Says Blueprint for Israel-Palestinian Settlement Is Not Negotiable

Washington (AP) - The White House said Monday its road map for setting up a Palestinian state by the end of 2005 is not negotiable and that Israel must "play its part" to pave the way.

In a speech to a pro-Israel lobby group, Condoleezza Rice, who is President Bush's national security adviser, also called on all Arab governments to recognize Israel's right to exist and said democratic reforms within the Palestinian Authority were "extremely important."

The road map, prepared jointly with the European Union, the United Nations and Russia, is designed to reopen negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians once Mahmoud Abbas is confirmed as the Palestinian prime minister.

Rice's call for a quick start - one that would prevent attempts by either side to revise the terms of the so-called road map - follows complaints by European and Arab governments that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon would try to arrange more favorable terms.

They registered their objections after President Bush had said "we will expect and welcome contributions from Israel and the Palestinians to this document."

But first Secretary of State Colin Powell, and now Rice, in responding to questions at the 44th annual policy meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, tried to discourage delay.

Rice, who had asked that her remarks to thousands of members of the pro-Israel lobby be off-the-record to the news media, said of Israel and the Palestinians: "We expect their comments; it is not a matter of renegotiation. It can be commented on by the parties."

Bush envisions two states, democratic Israel and democratic Palestine, living side by side in peace.

On the war with Iraq, Bush's assistant said the most effective way to deal with Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was to try to eliminate them before they could be used.

On the war itself, she said "we are confident of the outcome."

And on Iran, which Bush has included with Iraq and North Korea in an "axis of evil," Rice said the International Atomic Energy Agency "needs to do a more thorough investigation" of its nuclear weapons program.

On Sunday, Powell said Iran must stop its drive for weapons of mass destruction and Syria must end its support for terrorism.

In a strongly worded speech to the pro-Israel lobby, Powell bracketed Iran and Syria with Iraq as promoters of terrorism and suggested they faced grave consequences.

His tough words matched those last week of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and served to signal unity within the Bush administration on the anti-terror front.

Both Iran and Syria have shown no inclination to bend to the Bush administration's growing rhetorical campaign against them.

Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk al-Sharaa said Sunday that "Syria has a national interest in the expulsion of the invaders from Iraq."

Rumsfeld on Friday accused Syria of supplying military technology to Iraq, a charge Syria denied. He also said the United States would hold Iran responsible for the entrance of Iran-sponsored forces into Iraq.

Carrying the threat a step forward, Powell on Sunday demanded that Iran "stop its support for terrorism against Israel" and said Tehran also "must stop its pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and the ability to produce them."

Turning to the regime in Damascus, Powell said "Syria now faces a critical choice" of whether to "continue its direct support for terrorism in the dying days" of President Saddam Hussein's government in Iraq.

"Syria bears responsibility for its choices and consequences," Powell said sternly at the 44th annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

And Powell said, to wide applause from the heavily Jewish audience, "we will keep his weapons of mass destruction from the Middle East."

Stepping into a growing debate, Powell, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Persian Gulf War in 1991, endorsed the Bush administration's current war plan, which has encountered some criticism as the drive against Saddam has slowed.

"I have total confidence in the plan and total confidence in General (Tommy) Franks and those carrying out the plan," he said.

Powell renewed the Bush administration's support for establishment of a Palestinian state by the end of 2005, and said the drive would be stepped up once Mahmoud Abbas was confirmed as prime minister.

The longtime lieutenant of Yasser Arafat has at times spoken in support of all measures against Israel and at other times appeared critical of attacks on civilians.

On Sunday, Powell urged Israel to make peace with the Palestinian Authority, saying "Israel's security requires peace with its neighbors." He also renewed President Bush's call for a halt to Jewish home-building on the West Bank and Gaza, which drew a mixed response of mild applause and a few boos.

Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom followed Powell's speech with his own condemnation of Iran as a sponsor of terrorism. He said Iran was behind the bloody attacks in 1992 on the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires and in 1994 on a Jewish center in capital of Argentina.

"We will work closely with the United States to oppose terror," the minister said.

On the conflict with the Palestinians, Shalom was cautious. "We need a true Palestinian partner, one who will stop the violence once and for all," he said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: balfour
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: SunStar
What's the alternative, short of killing them all or forcing them into Jordan and Egypt?

Living together in peace maybe?

21 posted on 03/31/2003 11:12:12 AM PST by Terriergal (In Your great compassion you gave them deliverers, who rescued them from the hand of their enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ga Rob
There is no chance Israel and her friends will take this ultimatum seriously... and I would like to ask Condie what is the unseemly haste of the Administration in setting up a state for those who hate America. Has she lost her mind? Sorry, but I'll fight her and the President tooth and nail on this one on behalf of America's interests.
22 posted on 03/31/2003 11:12:43 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
"outer-area settlements"....

I guess that's a code word for the Occupied Territories? Which of course is a code phrase for land that Israel took fair and square when they won the 6 days war. A war where they were attacked. Why should they give up anything?
23 posted on 03/31/2003 11:13:56 AM PST by Ga Rob ("Consensus is the ABSENCE of Leadership" The Iron Lady)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes; Terriergal; Victoria Delsoul; harpseal; Travis McGee; dennisw; veronica; glock rocks; ...
Washington (AP) - The White House said Monday its road map for setting up a Palestinian state by the end of 2005 is not negotiable and that Israel must "play its part" to pave the way.

In a speech to a pro-Israel lobby group, Condoleezza Rice, who is President Bush's national security adviser, also called on all Arab governments to recognize Israel's right to exist and said democratic reforms within the Palestinian Authority were "extremely important."

The road map, prepared jointly with the European Union, the United Nations and Russia, is designed to reopen negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians once Mahmoud Abbas is confirmed as the Palestinian prime minister. Rice, who had asked that her remarks to thousands of members of the pro-Israel lobby be off-the-record to the news media, said of Israel and the Palestinians: "We expect their comments; it is not a matter of renegotiation. It can be commented on by the parties."

Bush envisions two states, democratic Israel and democratic Palestine, living side by side in peace.

Unless the President envisions the River Jordan between the two states, he will not win the War on Terror.

The failure of the first Gulf War was twofold: Hussein was left in power, and the Oslo accords gave power to Yasser Arafat. The Administration is giving every indication of having only learned one of the lessons.

The road map is a dead end.




24 posted on 03/31/2003 11:14:50 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
But why is he talking about a Palestinian state by 2005 if the Arab terrorist states haven't done what you say they must?

Because after we kick Saddam and Assad out of the region, the hope is that the Arabs will fall in line. We'll see what happens, but if the Arabs do not do their part, I don't see the state becoming a reality.

25 posted on 03/31/2003 11:15:28 AM PST by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Do you really think that the Arabs will honor the prerequisites? I don't.

No. You know that. I know that. And Bush knows that. Yet he keep going about saying we will have a Palestinian state by 2005. That does not make any sense, especially because terrorism against Israel has been increasing.

26 posted on 03/31/2003 11:16:10 AM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal
Let's hope you're right and the stuff in this article is, as johnb838 said in post #9, window dressing to prove laster on that the Arabs are not willing to compromise.

Bush will not stab Israel in the back. You can be assured of that. He is a man of his word.

27 posted on 03/31/2003 11:16:20 AM PST by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Yehuda
Ping.
28 posted on 03/31/2003 11:16:28 AM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ga Rob
I guess that's a code word for the Occupied Territories? Which of course is a code phrase for land that Israel took fair and square when they won the 6 days war. A war where they were attacked. Why should they give up anything?

Maybe because the land Israel took through war included a population of Arabs who still live there?

29 posted on 03/31/2003 11:17:48 AM PST by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Because after we kick Saddam and Assad out of the region, the hope is that the Arabs will fall in line. We'll see what happens, but if the Arabs do not do their part, I don't see the state becoming a reality.

YES. BUT WE HAVEN'T DONE THAT YET OR HAVE SEEN THAT YET. WHY RUSH TO SOME IDEA THAT IS BASED ON SOMETHING THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED YET?

30 posted on 03/31/2003 11:18:09 AM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Yet he keep going about saying we will have a Palestinian state by 2005. That does not make any sense, especially because terrorism against Israel has been increasing.

Maybe he knows something we don't? (Like the overall war plan for the Arab region.)

31 posted on 03/31/2003 11:18:57 AM PST by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: yonif
YES. BUT WE HAVEN'T DONE THAT YET OR HAVE SEEN THAT YET. WHY RUSH TO SOME IDEA THAT IS BASED ON SOMETHING THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED YET?

Do you think that Saddam Hussein will be deposed by the USA? If so, why? After all, it hasn't happened yet.

32 posted on 03/31/2003 11:19:49 AM PST by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
I believe you are right.
33 posted on 03/31/2003 11:19:49 AM PST by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
"What's the alternative, short of killing them all or forcing them into Jordan and Egypt?"

That sounds like a perfect alternative, considering that is what ALL the other States in the middle east would like to see happen to Israel. If the problem is just the settlements why was Israel attacked in '67 by all it's neighbors. Because they wanted Israel gone. How dare the actual legitimate owners of that land actually live there???!!??? Israel was attacked and defended herself and won. The territories are their land. It's not about "Palestinians" it's about the end of Israel and to a lesser extent the only democracy in the middle east.

It's funny, the leader of the PLO/PLA is an Egyptian, whose wife and daughter live in a posh Paris apartment.....

34 posted on 03/31/2003 11:21:33 AM PST by Ga Rob ("Consensus is the ABSENCE of Leadership" The Iron Lady)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Because, Israel is building NEW settlements on existing lands occupied by the Arab "refugees" who call themselves "Palestinians". What's the alternative, short of killing them all or forcing them into Jordan and Egypt?

Israel is building settlements on what is legitmately Israeli land. The palestinians are not a legitmate people, they have no legitimate national identity, they do noit recognize Israel's borders, and they've already had an artificial homeland created for them: Jordan. This is the reason for Jordan's existence. That is where the palestinians should go, the Hashmeite occupation notwithstanding.

It is time to stop rewarding Arab terrorism. The road map giving a second "palestinian" state to the Arabs will reward past terrorism, and encourage more of the same. This is indisuptable, there is no evidence to the contrary.

There will be war either way. Why are we trying so mightily to put one of our best friends and allies at a disadvantage before it breaks out?

Who is Condilezza Rice to tell Israel to commit national suicide?




35 posted on 03/31/2003 11:22:20 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Yes.

But we are basing our attitudes towards a Palestinians state on what will happen in the Arab world after Saddam is deposed.
36 posted on 03/31/2003 11:22:40 AM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All
People really believe this?

Bush et al are appeasing no one for one simple reason: it's all public relations nonsense got up to please those who are dumb enough to believe it. And you think Sharon isn't in on this? When it comes time to stop building/expanding settlements and setting up a "Palestinian" state dollars to donuts something will blow up and it just won't happen.

The Bush administration are simply throwing a bone to the Arabs and Blair's supporters in Britain.
37 posted on 03/31/2003 11:25:16 AM PST by Asher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Huh?? There are Arabs who live down the street from me...they lived there before I moved in....we don't suicide bomb each other. There are plenty of Arab-Israelis who live in Israel and get along quite well. If left to their own devices, the Arabs who live in the territories would function just fine as Israeli citizens.

The fact of the matter is, they are not left to their own devices. They are manipulated by the groups and organazations funded by the Arab states. The terrorists are a proxy for the states in the reigon who cannot complete their goal of whipping out Israel.
38 posted on 03/31/2003 11:27:55 AM PST by Ga Rob ("Consensus is the ABSENCE of Leadership" The Iron Lady)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
Israel was created in 1948... Prior to that, I believe the British were in charge. So, how did the Jews give up 78% of the Transjordan before Israel was even created?

The British Mandate for Palestine
... the Balfour Declaration applied. This has remained a grievance with the Zionist side,
but it should be remembered that the area to the east of the river Jordan ...
www.mideastweb.org/mandate.htm - 30k - Cached - Similar pages

The British Mandate
... Mandate for Palestine" the area that is today Israel and Jordan became the ... of the
British Mandate incorporated the language of the Balfour Declaration and were ...
www.palestinefacts.org/pf_ww1_british_mandate.php - 11k - Cached - Similar pages

The British Mandate: Overview
... In 1921, Britain took the 91,000 square kilometers of the Palestine Mandate east
of the Jordan River, and created Trans-Jordan (later the Arab country of Jordan ...
www.palestinefacts.org/pf_mandate_overview.php - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.palestinefacts.org ]

Ask Jeeves: Search Results for "British Mandate"
... 1. The British Mandate for Palestine The League of Nations Mandate for Palestine,
1922 ... israel.htm 8. Modern History Sourcebook: The Balfour Declaration (1917 ...
webster.directhit.com/webster/ search.aspx?qry=British+Mandate - 27k - Cached - Similar pages

[PDF]contemporary 4
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... Israel after World War II (utilizing the Balfour Declaration and the League of Nations
Mandate for Palestine ... Israel and the Arab nations of Jordan and Syria ...
www.sasinschool.com/resource/ pages/pdf/contemporary_4.pdf - Similar pages

A History of the Land of Israel
... This is why both the Balfour Declaration and the League of Nations Mandate charged
the Jews ... anger would have been directed as much against Jordan and Egypt ...
www.uiuc.edu/ro/tagar/History.htm - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

The British Mandate With Arab help, the British took ...
... With the Balfour Declaration, Britain's aim was ... was incorporated into the League
of Nations mandate for Palestine ... armies of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt and ...
members.tripod.com/~lenapedata/Background.htm - 10k - Cached - Similar pages

British Mandate of Palestine - Wikipedia
... In 1921 Britain separated its League of Nations mandate of Palestine and Transjordan
east of the Jordan River into a separate territory, Transjordan. ...
www.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_mandate_of_Palestine - 32k - Cached - Similar pages

The History and Meaning of "Palestine" and "Palestinians" - The ...
... The Balfour Declaration of 1917, confirmed by the League of Nations Mandate, commited
the ... originally included all of what is now Jordan, as well as ...
www.cdn-friends-icej.ca/isreport/ july01/history_palestine.html - 19k - Cached - Similar pages

British Mandate 1920-1946
... the area which today comprises Israel and Jordan. ... was to become a League of Nations
Mandate, entrusted to ... the implementation of the Balfour Declaration of ...




39 posted on 03/31/2003 11:28:33 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
I suspect Rice knows . . .

but may not find it . . . kosher to assert it in her job

. . .

that we ain't seen nothin' yet about

"nonnegotiable"

until we see how NONNEGOTIABLE

GOD IS ABOUT HIS CHOSEN'S COVENANT LANDS.

IN HIS TIME. . .
40 posted on 03/31/2003 11:31:40 AM PST by Quix (QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson