Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
No, this was more. It was acting directly as an accomplice to enemy propaganda. I think it is appropriate for MSNBC, NBC and National Geographic to fire Arnett.

The more interesting question is whether Arnette's behavior is actionable. Some have suggested he is not an American citizen, rather a New Zealander. If so, he cannot be charged with treason. New Zealand is not a member of the coalition; they're sitting this one out, so there are no New Zealand charges that could be brought, as far as I know. The question would then be what grounds are their for the US charging him with a crime? I suppose we could try simply arresting him as an enemy propagandist and try him as a war criminal for attempting to undermine our war effort. Or, perhaps it would simply be better if his efforts to leave Baghdad were unsuccessful and he was turned over the the Kurds.

195 posted on 03/31/2003 5:47:25 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Mesopotamiam Esse Delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: CatoRenasci
I'm not an attorney and I haven't stayed at a Holiday Inn Express lately, but if I'm not mistaken, the U.S. can permanently revoke his entry rights to the USA and permanently revoke Arnett's visa. But if there are any attorneys online, I'd love to verify this.

V


218 posted on 03/31/2003 5:54:52 AM PST by Beck_isright (Scotch: a drink the Iraqis fear. Long live the Black Watch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: CatoRenasci
It was acting directly as an accomplice to enemy propaganda

I can agree that his doing the interview itself regardless of what he said is problematic. In essence his agreement to give them the interview, something he didn't have to do, was the "aid" give the enemy.

I can live with that but the charachterization is he was fired for what he said at the interview.

222 posted on 03/31/2003 5:56:16 AM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: CatoRenasci
It would be satisfying to charge him with a crime.

Less satisfying would be for the casualties and American POWs, along with the families of those KIA, to hit him with a class action lawsuit, saying that his actions caused them harm.

Take every penny this guy earned from his enemy propaganda efforts, and give it to those harmed by his work.

244 posted on 03/31/2003 6:08:38 AM PST by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: CatoRenasci
There have been several posts to the effect that Arnett became a naturalized citizen in the 80's. If so, he didn't take the oath of loyalty he swore very seriously.
275 posted on 03/31/2003 6:29:26 AM PST by sweetliberty ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson