Skip to comments.
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 12 - LIVE THREAD***
Multiple ^
| March 31st, 2003
| Various
Posted on 03/30/2003 9:00:51 PM PST by An.American.Expatriate
Good Morning.
Welcome to the Situation Room of Operation Iraqi Freedom - LIVE THREAD.
It is designed for general conversation about the events of the day. In depth discussion of events should be left to individual threads - but links to the threads or other articles is highly encouraged. This allows us to stay abreast of the situation in general, while also providing a means of obtaining specific information.
Links to the older threads:
Operation Iraqi Freedom - Day 1 - LIVE THREAD ... 4557 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 2-LIVE THREAD*** ... 5704 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 3-LIVE THREAD*** ... 4751 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 4 - LIVE THREAD*** ... 6045 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 5 - LIVE THREAD*** ... 4869 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 6 - LIVE THREAD*** ... 5126 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 7 - LIVE THREAD*** ... 4110 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 8 - LIVE THREAD*** ... 3863 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 9 - LIVE THREAD*** ... 3532 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 10 - LIVE THREAD*** ... 2545 posts
***Operation Iraqi Freedom - Situation Room - Day 11 - LIVE THREAD*** ...
Mhking's links:
Updated links (Null and Void alphabetized them and found a few other interesting ones):
Live Video/Audio Feeds:
(If you can't reach a feed by clicking on it, make sure to try copying the address, and pasting it in the appropriate browser -- WMV=Windows Media Player; Real=Real Player/RealOne; MP3=WinAmp/Audion/other streaming MP3 player; QT=QuickTime)
FR: Final Update: Streaming Video/Audio Links (Includes info & HTML/Javascript code on how to create your own multi-feeds page)
Abu Dhabi TV (Real - Arabic)
BBC/Baghdad Cam(Real)
BBC News 24 (Real - 56)
BBC News 24 (Real - BB)
CablePulse 24 - Toronto (WMV)
CBS/Baghdad Cam (Real)
CBC RadioOne - Toronto (QT)
CN8 Philadelphia (Real)
CNN+ (Spain) (WMV)
CNN Baghdad Cam (WMV)
CNN Radio (WMV)
CNN via KGW/Portland (Real - down)
DW-TV Berlin (Real - In German Where Available/Some programming in English)
ITN News Channel - London (Real - Audio Only)
MSNBC/NBC (WMV/Feeds page)
MSNBC (WMV - Audio Only - Headlines & Breaking News)
N-TV Berlin (Real - In German Where Available)
NWCN, Seattle/Portland (Real - down)
Sky News (56K - WMV/Copy/Paste)
Sky News (BB - WMV/Copy-Paste)
SNN6 Sarasota, FL (Real)
WSVN-TV/DT Miami (WMV - Fox Affiliate)
Please have mercy on us dial up limited FReepers! Limit the big graphics, post links instead. A brief description of what the graphic is would help:
To all who helped this get started, thank you!
Special thanks to null and void for keeping these threads running on the weekends, Mo1 for the screamer, the AdminMods for their tolerance, mhking for the video links, and, of course,...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: freedom; iraq; iraqifreedom; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 2,481-2,496 next last
To: merrin
I don't see any "major" mistakes. I see our troops surrounding baghville.
101
posted on
03/30/2003 10:06:22 PM PST
by
Mr.Crimson
(Where's the MOAB when you need it)
To: Consort
well said and very true
102
posted on
03/30/2003 10:07:15 PM PST
by
texxie
(Please Mess with Peter Arnett!!!!)
To: null and void; texxie; SamAdams76; Greenpees
n&v, I forgot to mention that my glass is half-full, and I'm ok with that.
texxie & Greenpees, thanks, and welcome to FR. Greenpees, maybe you'll get used to ole nicollo. He's renowned for making a fool of himself, but he's good at it.
Sam, you wrote, "Don't rush, take your time and do the job right." I'm tempted to agree, but I'm not so inclined. I think we'll keep moving. I'm intrigued by the lack of news from the front. I think that indicates more, rather than less is about to happen.
The initial rush was brilliant. There is so much bad that didn't happen because the heroes of the 3rd ID and the Marines are knocking on Baghdad's door, as well as the rest of our boys & girls who're running all over Iraq. Nothing we could have accomplished without sending in the 3rd cannot be accomplished, or better, with them there. And,damn, what Special Ops has accomplished is unreal, and I can only begin to imagine it. Think about it:
Firstly, there is no longer any, ANY argument whether or not we should invade. Even if we bombed first while loading up fully in Kuwait a la Gulf I, the pressure not to invade would be increased and immense, and the public would be unsure. All anybody can say today is that we shouldn't have invaded. Even France has done some serious STFU of late. The UN has been rendered entirely useless, and far more so than had we not gone with the rolling start. Sometimes the past tense is one's best friend... (it never seemed to work with my wives and ex-wives, but that's another story).
Another huge benefit of the quick invasion is that the WMD inspections are pedal to the metal, and most intrusive. Air power is great, but the colonoscopy is a hands-on procedure.
There's a host of things that haven't happened, from no scuds at Tel Aviv, no burning of the world's 2nd largest oil fields, to no genocide in Iraq. Among the many things that have been made far more difficult for the Iraqis is coordination with Al Queda and other terrorists, UN legitimacy, and the PR campaign be run out of Paris. On the diplomatic scene, our allies have more political cover from the invasion than they would have under a slower start, and our enemies have lost their straw man. Kuwait, Saudi, Jordan, etc. are forced and fixed in our line. Oh, and Turkey is screwed.
It could have been very, very different. The rolling start was brilliant.
103
posted on
03/30/2003 10:08:03 PM PST
by
nicollo
(Americans kick ass. And it ain't no accident of time or place.)
To: texxie
wooo hoooo!
104
posted on
03/30/2003 10:08:55 PM PST
by
Mr.Crimson
(Where's the MOAB when you need it)
To: Paradox
B) the "Media" is doing a major meltdown and has gotten the "jist" of things totally wrong and will have MAJOR egg on their faces in a few months.Sorry Paradox but the media made many of the same errors about the war to liberate Kuwait. They made many of the same errors about the war in Afghanistan.
And yes they will be wrong on this war too. But they report lots of thing, ie police chases ect, correctly and know no matter how wrong they are today they will be right about some things and can be right again tommorrow. That gives them great confidence to report it the way they see it. They know nobody is right all the time and nobody is wrong all the time. So they can get away with their biases when they want.
105
posted on
03/30/2003 10:10:01 PM PST
by
JLS
To: Mr.Crimson
Yeah, but this is stinking little Iraq. If we were in any danger of losing to this third-world backwater, there would be something deeply wrong with the very fabric of time and space.
Anyway, I'm not saying there were major mistakes. Frankly, I don't know enough about military matters to have a firm opinion. Maybe Rumsfeld's brilliant and guys like Ralph Peters are just worrywarts.
106
posted on
03/30/2003 10:10:17 PM PST
by
merrin
To: two23
Airbourne Guy. Great Post.
107
posted on
03/30/2003 10:12:09 PM PST
by
oceanperch
(Support Our Troops)
To: merrin
..."Chemical Ali". These Iraqienianese all look alike to me.
108
posted on
03/30/2003 10:12:20 PM PST
by
Consort
To: JLS
There was no Fox news during Kuwait and the embedded thing isnt being used in Afganhistan as it is here. I believe those two developements will change the future of news reporting on military actions.
109
posted on
03/30/2003 10:12:29 PM PST
by
Mr.Crimson
(Where's the MOAB when you need it)
To: Consort
He looks like a used car salesman
110
posted on
03/30/2003 10:13:18 PM PST
by
Mr.Crimson
(Where's the MOAB when you need it)
To: Mr.Crimson
lol dare I ask????????
111
posted on
03/30/2003 10:13:47 PM PST
by
texxie
(Please Mess with Peter Arnett!!!!)
To: nicollo
Marines have stormed Shatra ,Army fighting door to door in another town.Marines have POWs. (dozens of RG) 7th in a stand off with city hiding troops.
112
posted on
03/30/2003 10:13:55 PM PST
by
MEG33
To: Consort
I think his brother is "Damnation" Ali.
113
posted on
03/30/2003 10:14:00 PM PST
by
merrin
To: texxie
Nah,you don't
114
posted on
03/30/2003 10:14:35 PM PST
by
Mr.Crimson
(Where's the MOAB when you need it)
To: Paradox
I think that the nature of this plan is becoming a bit clear in general, and I think it has been dictated by events in Turkey to some extent (not totally, however).
I do not think the level of resistence has caused the plan to "go out the window" nor do I think the Fedayeen attacks, if you can call them that, play any role whatsoever (except greatly increasing the Iraqi bodycount and modestly increasing ours). Military plans are not created in a manner that stiffer-than-expected resistence causes them to blow up, particularly when that resistence is not successful in causing attrition to your own forces.
The weather may be something of a factor -- but it too is probably modest to moderate in its impact.
The plan appears to have been designed to cordon off Baghdad from two directions, with a third (the north) to be added later, later is of necessity since the 4th ID is not up there. This cordon is the first line of the siege of Baghdad that has been talked about so much. It allows us to fight smaller battles in mop-up areas at a slow easy pace that reduces our own casualties. Mini-sieges, such as Basra. The siege is designed to allow us to concentrate our air power in an area the size of Connecticutt instead of spreading it out over a California sized area. We play a game of attrition, slowly reducing the equipment and the supply available to Iraqi forces -- and then we probe and push inwards.
We all laughed a few weeks ago (before the war) when the 1st Armored Division and the 1st Cavalry Division were given deployment orders to Iraq as follow on forces that wouldn't arrive until at least May (at the earliest). That is a tremendous offensive punch coming into theatre pretty late, in our estimation. Well, I guess Rumsfeld really was thinking about a longer war.
With the attrition that Iraq's forces will suffer and the deprevation of supply that will become critical to them, those units will be able to crush the egg-shell around Baghdad pretty easily.
To: Consort
he looks like a double
116
posted on
03/30/2003 10:16:03 PM PST
by
texxie
(Please Mess with Peter Arnett!!!!)
To: texxie
OK, I really don't get it, but that could be due to my poor befuddled brain.
117
posted on
03/30/2003 10:16:04 PM PST
by
Grenada
To: nicollo
Thank you for your post #103. You said what I didn't have the words to say. No one knows if (no one here that is) if the plan is on track or not. The people who do know aren't going to tell anyone either. But your summation is spot on.
118
posted on
03/30/2003 10:17:30 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Let the liberals whine. - It's what they do!)
To: merrin
His uncle is Gasoline Ali.
119
posted on
03/30/2003 10:17:32 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Aaron0617
cool...some video feed of Australian lookin to put some pain on someone. GO AUSSIES!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 2,481-2,496 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson