Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAQI GENERAL CAPTURED
Sky News ^ | March 30, 2003

Posted on 03/30/2003 9:09:31 AM PST by Dog Gone

British troops trying to win control of the outskirts of Iraq's second largest city, Basra, say they have captured an Iraqi general.

There are also reports an Iraqi Republican Guard colonel has been killed in fighting.

Royal Marines near Basra have discovered chemical suits in raids on Iraqi forces, Sky News has been told.

They made the discovery during a mission called Operation James - after film spy James Bond.

Targets were given names including Pussy Galore, Goldfinger and Blofeld, all characters in the 007 movies.

Sky's David Bowden said British tanks blocked off a major road junction to stop Iraqi troops breaking out of a suburb of Basra.

Around 22 Iraqi T55 tanks were destroyed in an artillery bombardment, Bowden, with British troops near the city, was told.

High ranking officers

Military officials told him a number of Iraqi soldiers have been captured, including two who are believed to be high ranking officers.

Reuters also reported that an Iraqi colonel had been killed in fighting in the south east of Basra.

Bowden said officers told him chemical warfare suits have been discovered by the troops.

Referring to the name of the operation, Bowden said: "People in the command post are, to continue the analogy, shaken by the resistance coming their way - but not stirred by the task ahead."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: operationjames
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2003 9:09:32 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
It's nice to see the Brits keeping their dry wit, even during this dangerous operation.
2 posted on 03/30/2003 9:14:10 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Targets were given names including Pussy Galore,...

Sounds like a raid on Basra's Cat House. Maybe that's were they captured the General!

3 posted on 03/30/2003 9:14:56 AM PST by Pern (It's good to know who hates you, and it's good to be hated by the right people - Johnny Cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The name is Bond, James Bond...

bond

4 posted on 03/30/2003 9:18:19 AM PST by jellybean (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1979763521 The Clinton Legacy Cookbook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Around 22 Iraqi T55 tanks were destroyed in an artillery bombardment...

I have some experience as a U. S. Army field artillery officer, and I'm not aware that field artillery can destroy tanks. Does anyone get the feeling that sometimes the troops on the ground are just feeding crazy stories to journalists for their own amusement, to see what will get printed?

5 posted on 03/30/2003 9:18:25 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Now I have that theme song running through my head. (Dum-da-daaa-da-da-da dum-da-daaaa-da ...Ba-daaaaaa)

"Here's to you, Royal Marines! Cheers...."

6 posted on 03/30/2003 9:20:45 AM PST by shezza (Shaken, not stirred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
I'm not aware that field artillery can destroy tanks.

During the Battle of the Bulge US 8" self-propelled guns were employed "direct fire" to kill Royal Tigers, I am told by someone who was there and has the decorations to prove it. I don't know of a field artillery armor piercing round, but I suppose a contact fuze HE round would do enough damage, direct fire.

7 posted on 03/30/2003 9:24:16 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Yeah, artillery can be used in a direct fire mode to take out armored vehicles, but it a very rare and dangerous tactic, and this only works against vehicles with relatively light armor like APC's -- I suspect that even a T-55 is modern enough to absorb a direct hit.

I remain highly sceptical about the report that the Brits used artillery to take out a significant number of T-55's -- they most likely used other weapons that are meant to do this job, like direct fire from tanks and TOW missles, or laser-guided bombs.

And when I read reports that seem to have some facts wrong, it makes me wonder about the truth of the other details in the report.

I still suspect troops on the ground are having some fun by feeding misleading info to reporters to see what will get into print, and to keep the enemy guessing about what we're really doing.
8 posted on 03/30/2003 9:34:24 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Does anyone get the feeling that sometimes the troops on the ground are just feeding crazy stories to journalists for their own amusement, to see what will get printed?

could by PSY-OPS. But some poor grunt complained he was hungry the other day and the PRESS turned it into a DISASTER of monumental proportion

9 posted on 03/30/2003 9:38:57 AM PST by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Maybe not an Abrams or a British Challenger. But we're talking T-55s and T-72s here. My son could probably take some of them out with his slingshot. Ok, so maybe I'm exaggerating just a bit.
10 posted on 03/30/2003 9:43:03 AM PST by SamAdams76 (California wine beats French wine in blind taste tests. Boycott French wine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
You might have seen the video tape of Brit. 155s firing at high angle. They may have been using terminally guided AT rounds that have a shaped charge and radar terminal guidance. They kill through the relatively thin top armor.
11 posted on 03/30/2003 9:43:34 AM PST by GRANGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Around 22 Iraqi T55 tanks were destroyed in an artillery bombardment...

I'm not aware that field artillery can destroy tanks.

Another possibility -- the reporters don't know the difference between field artillery and SP guns.

12 posted on 03/30/2003 9:45:09 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
How do they know he's a General and not some homeless bum who put on the General's uniform after he traded it for civilian disguise?
13 posted on 03/30/2003 10:00:25 AM PST by rageaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
I don't know if they are deployed, or if the Brits have something similar, but copperhead artillery shells are made specifically to destroy tanks.

Copphead info


14 posted on 03/30/2003 10:28:16 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

Sequence of telemetered Copperhead round (without warhead) during test firing at White Sands, Dec. 9, 1977. In other tests the warhead was tested as well.

Copperhead, the Army's M712 Cannon-Launched Guided Projectile, was a precision guided 155mm, indirect fire weapon capable of destroying small, static or moving, hard point targets. Operationally, an artillery forward observer was equipped with a laser designator which he would use to pinpoint the target after he directed the artillery to launch a Copperhead into the selected area. As the projectile approached the target area, it picked up the laser signal and homed in on the target.

Copperhead was fired from a conventional 155mm howitser. It was 54 inches long and weighed 138 pounds. It carried a shaped charge capable of penetrating tank armor.

15 posted on 03/30/2003 10:33:30 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I remember at Camp Geiger (Marines ITS) we used an old tank for LAAW target practice. We must have hit that thing a hundred times and it was still standing there.
16 posted on 03/30/2003 10:33:39 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

The M109A6 basic load is 37 complete conventional rounds and two Copperhead rounds. The CATV basic load is 96 conventional rounds and four Copperhead rounds. The CATV may average one to five rearming moves per day in addition to tactical and survivability moves. A section, consisting of a howitzer and a CATV, normally operates as one of three sections in a platoon but may operate alone in a fire area.

17 posted on 03/30/2003 10:38:19 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Probably the greatest anti-tank gun ever was the German 88, which started its life as an anti-aircraft flak weapon.
18 posted on 03/30/2003 10:38:23 AM PST by bootyist-monk (Lemon curry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Do you remember the spiel about, "Gentlemen, someday we will have weapons with this capability."

A rifle man with a M-14 shoots at a tank downrange.
Kablooie, they set off a case of tnt in the turret.

It was awesome.

Mad minute Bump.
19 posted on 03/30/2003 10:39:13 AM PST by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"I have some experience as a U. S. Army field artillery officer, and I'm not aware that field artillery can destroy tanks."

As others have alluded to above, the copperhead is a highly effective round, but requires an FO on the ground to point a laser. Cluster munitions delivered by MLRS and other systems may not, "destroy," armor, per se; however, it can seriously degrade armor operations by creating mobility kills by disabling a tank's track, damaging external optics, etc.

20 posted on 03/30/2003 10:45:56 AM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson