To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hit piece.
Liars and morons.
2 posted on
03/30/2003 5:50:22 AM PST by
tomahawk
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Where's the barf alert?
3 posted on
03/30/2003 5:51:31 AM PST by
LarryM
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Have you kept track of how many of these types of stories are out today?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rumsfeld's Reuters Role as War Strategist Correspondent Under Scrutiny
7 posted on
03/30/2003 5:54:39 AM PST by
EggsAckley
(A little more Shock and Awe, please. A little less Shuck and Jive.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If it's Reuters criticising Rumsfeld, he must be spot on.
He's the new "Donald"
8 posted on
03/30/2003 5:55:31 AM PST by
Blueflag
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Former, Retired, Press, they just hate to see someone suceed when they have failed.
11 posted on
03/30/2003 6:01:27 AM PST by
gulfcoast6
(Never pass up the chance to keep you mouth shut.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rumsfeld and the Bush administration have been allowed exactly zero mistakes in this war by the media and the Hollywood misfits....who in turn are anxious for another American failure.
This is just a repeat of how the Media and Hollywood lost the Vietnam war by carefully cultivating the public to aquire a loser's attitude.
15 posted on
03/30/2003 6:05:11 AM PST by
rmvh
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Reuters vs. Rumsfeld
Oh, such a tough decision as to whose side to take.
One is a press agency that sides with people who vow in the name of Allah to conduct a jihah to kill American civilian and military personnel.
Another is a Defense Secretary whose vow to destroy the terrorists and will accept no outcome but victory in defeating those who have vowed to kill American civilian and military personnel.
I really have to think about this before making a decision. ;-)
16 posted on
03/30/2003 6:06:17 AM PST by
cgbg
(We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Military analyst Jack Spencer of the Heritage Foundation said Rumsfeld is facing the huge task of bringing change to an institution, the military, that resists it mightily.
That's what this is all about. It really has nothing to do with the war in Iraq.
For what it's worth I'm sure Rumsfeld and the President knew they would come under this kind of attack.
"Bureaucracy defends the status quo long past the time when the quo has lost its status."
Laurence J. Peter (1919 - 1988)
19 posted on
03/30/2003 6:10:18 AM PST by
Valin
(Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Everyone seems to be forgetting that we needed to start this thing PRONTO!!
Plus the turks screwed us!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"
Goure said. "I don't think that he is doing as good a job, partly because people, including the media, are bored with him, bored with his shtick."Goure = Gore?
23 posted on
03/30/2003 6:21:38 AM PST by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life needn't be fatal)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
McCaffrey said some moves have been "just shockingThis McCaffrey is a disgrace. Remember when he was running the DEA and some of his own agents and their wives were dealing with the drug pushers?
27 posted on
03/30/2003 6:30:28 AM PST by
scouse
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is just more Reuters BS posing as a news article, and it is typical of the BS from Reuters since 9/11/2001.
Reuters is not able to print the truth when it comes to Islamofacist/kazi terrorism and the thugs in control of Iraq.
Reuters is controlled by an rich Opecker Prince who will not allow the words terrorism or terrorist to be used in any article where the Islamofacists/kazis are responsible.
The pure bull $ that Reuters has printed since New Years to save their Uncle Soddomite's rear end is massive and like a continuing wet dream by Reuters with little if any basis on reality! This wet dream posing as a news article is a prime example of the BS Reuters puts out posing as news.
Believe nothing that Reuters has to say about the Islamofacists leaders, our allies and our administration. Reuters creates more Bravo Sierra in a day than 1,000,000 cattle do.
This meter should be run with the posting of any Reuters article. Reuters makes the NY Slimes look all most honest.
Meanwhile, Reuters is taking a beating in the business world. Recently, Reuters reported a loss of $631 million, the largest in its 150-year history. In addition, Reuters announced 3,000 job cuts, along with the 3,200 jobs cut over the past two years. Reuters' market capitalization has plunged by almost 90 percent from its peak, and Reuters' stock has fallen to a 14-year low. (Reuters posts record loss, to cut jobs News provider to cut 3,000 workers as part of turnaround plan , Link to how the Reuters lies and BS hits Reuters's bottom line)
Apparently Reuters' dwindling credibility as a media provider is now affecting their bottom line. May Reuters go broke and slide into the Irrelevant Cesspool!
Ho Humm, more Bravo Sierra from Reuters!
Grampa Dave's final Reuters comment, Beware of any Reuters post from those who hate America and claim to be patriots. No real conservative would ever use a Reuters hit piece as a center piece for an argument or discussion.
30 posted on
03/30/2003 6:56:05 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
("Those who are kind to the cruel end up being cruel to the kind!")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I had rather be a trooper under Franks or Rummy than anyone under the clowns of Baghdad:
Thanks to Diogenesis for posting this and pinging me.
44 posted on
03/30/2003 10:41:16 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
("Those who are kind to the cruel end up being cruel to the kind!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson