To: Lady In Blue
Hopefully this is not another rosy scenario being peddled.
2 posted on
03/29/2003 9:30:59 PM PST by
Travis McGee
(--------------------------- WAR SOLVED HITLER! -------------------------)
To: Big Steve; deport; blackie; nickcarraway; Maeve
ping
3 posted on
03/29/2003 9:31:59 PM PST by
Lady In Blue
(Bush,Cheney,Rumsfeld,Rice 2004)
To: Lady In Blue
According to Fox Pentagon correspondent Bret Baier Is Bret paid directly by the government, or is Fox a subcontractor?
To: Lady In Blue
if this news was read on baghdad ,it could get people killed,the source should have kept quiet.
To: Lady In Blue
I have appreciated Carl Limbacher's writing efforts in the past, but this one belongs in the "Loose Lips Sink Ships" category.
To: AdamSelene235; arete; Cicero; Fractal Trader; gabby hayes; Matchett-PI; Moonman62; OwenKellogg; ...
Would be great for us, our allies, Iraqi's if true. But I fear more likely it's Monday's rally rumor?
11 posted on
03/29/2003 9:38:03 PM PST by
Starwind
To: Lady In Blue
Well now, if you think about it, historically....isn't this HOW regimes fall? From within?
To: Lady In Blue
If history is any indicator this is wishful thinking. Stalin went into hiding during the first weeks of the war when Hitler invaded. He reportedly got drunk and hung out at his villa. When his cronies came to his Dacha to fetch him- he was expecting to be arressted and killed. He wasn't.
In such terror regimes all of the little Stalin's and Sadaam's depend on the heirarchy for survival. There was fierce loyalty to Stalin among his apparatchiks not because they loved him (they hated him) but because they would be dead without him. That is the same with the regime Sadaam has (and by many accounts he actually modeled his terror regime on a study of Stalin's tactics.) That this was not known to our fancy boy neocons when calling for this war is less than heartening.
16 posted on
03/29/2003 9:46:19 PM PST by
Burkeman1
(i)
To: Lady In Blue
Reminds me a little of the deal with Chief Moose and the snipers.
20 posted on
03/29/2003 9:49:13 PM PST by
arkady_renko
(I know they've been let down before)
To: Lady In Blue
That's what what John Keegan has also said. We don't need to enter Baghdad, it will collapse from within after we surround it.
To: Lady In Blue
If some Pentagon bigwig has gotten over optimistic about one particular scenario then this doesn't bother me. But I certainly hope they aren't counting on this.
To: Lady In Blue
I don't care how the regime falls; but please capture Hussein alive that he may be given a public and fair trial and summarily executed for all his oppressed citizens to see. Only then will they truly be free.
32 posted on
03/29/2003 10:04:35 PM PST by
so_real
To: Lady In Blue
According to Fox Pentagon correspondent Bret Baier, the source told him "We know who's with us, and we know who's against us, and we're in constant communication."Well, this is a crafty and vicious and wily enemy. I wouldn't be too sure about knowing who's on who's side. We could have double agents here.
40 posted on
03/29/2003 10:12:35 PM PST by
LPStar
To: Lady In Blue
Wonder how many Ba'athist loyalists will be accidentally shot by paranoid Saddam as a result of this report? Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of criminals. Spread it around....
46 posted on
03/29/2003 10:21:44 PM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Lady In Blue
bump
To: Lady In Blue
The way I heard it was the Baer(?) correspondent to Pentagon for Fox told Shepard Smith for broadcast that a senior Pentagon official told him that Baghdad would fall from within rather than without. There were really no more specifics than that so I was thinking that Hussein, if he is alive, would be capped by someone with access. My mind did not run to Delta Force scenarios. Who knows?
Sounds good though.
68 posted on
03/30/2003 12:17:27 AM PST by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson