Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txradioguy
analyst Eric Burns mildly chastised Fox's Shepherd Smith for his and other reporters' routine reference to American soldiers as "our troops." Burns said it would be better if reporters didn't taint their objectivity by identifying with America's troops.

This is the latest talking point from the left. There was a "professor" from NYU on O'Reilly last night touting the same BS.

13 posted on 03/29/2003 6:24:52 AM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CaptRon
"This is the latest talking point from the left. There was a "professor" from NYU on O'Reilly last night touting the same BS."


Somewhere in Heaven Ernie Pyle is cursing today's media and somewhere in Hell....Joseph Gobbels is smiling broadly.
15 posted on 03/29/2003 6:32:32 AM PST by txradioguy (HOOAH! Not just a word, A way of life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: CaptRon
This is what they teach in liberal journalism colleges. For a news organization to pretend they are impartial in this conflict is the height of dishonesty - very few really are. And if after seeing Saddam in action they still are, I certainly wouldn't patronize them with my time. I don't want my news from someone who isn't outraged by a tyrant like Saddam.

You can wear a flag pin, support the troops, call them "we" (I mean, isn't that the truth?)and still be fair and objective about supporting the news.

Go Fox Go!

17 posted on 03/29/2003 6:46:17 AM PST by I still care (All evil needs to prosper is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: CaptRon; All
"...analyst Eric Burns mildly chastised Fox's Shepherd Smith for his and other reporters' routine reference to American soldiers as "our troops." Burns said it would be better if reporters didn't taint their objectivity by identifying with America's troops."


Ok I'm gonna step up on my soapbox here for a minute. What the HELL is wrong with referring to U.S. soldiers as "our troops"? Are they not Americans like the reporters covering them? Since when did it become so wrong to cover our troops (oops...there's that nasty "our" word again)in a positive light? If you can gain access to them, go back and listen to the audio reports from the front lines of WW II and Korea. Go back and read the articles filed by Ernie Pyle. Pyle and the other journalists of his era would be absolutely excoriated by today's "experts". They wrote stories in such a way that you felt you were the person or people Pyle was covering. And there was nary a shred of neutrality that the pious media try to maintain today. I say "kudos' to Shep Smith. He's got the stones to not tuck his pro-American feelings in his pocket in the name of "professionalism". when the red light goes on. IMHO, if you wanna see the absolute shining example of restraint on air when it comes to letting his feeling show, I nominate David Asman. His adopted son is a Marine over there in the dirt as we speak. Yet from what I've seen, he's been a pro on the air the entire time. Knowing you've got to report on the deaths, the fighting and the bad as well as the good in this war to MILLIONS of viewers every day while a loved one is over there in harms way and could possible be one of the next casulties you have to announce is the PERFECT example of professionalism in journalism these days. Not arguing over the use of the word "our". Ok sopabox is now back in storage.
18 posted on 03/29/2003 6:53:26 AM PST by txradioguy (HOOAH! Not just a word, A way of life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson