Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EVIL PROOF [Brits Find Bunker Full of WMD's in S. Iraq Oil Fields]
The Daily Telegraph ^ | March 28, 2003 | Bruce Wilson

Posted on 03/27/2003 5:42:28 PM PST by k2blader

EVIL PROOF
By BRUCE WILSON in London
28mar03

BRITISH troops have uncovered a bunker full of weapons of mass destruction in the southern Iraqi oilfields.

The Ministry of Defence released a dramatic video it said showed more than 100 chemical warfare protection suits and mounds of dozens of artillery rounds it said contained suspected "weapons of mass destruction".

It was not immediately clear if the weapons contained chemical or biological warheads. They were not believed to be nuclear.

The bunker had been recently deserted by fleeing Iraqi troops attacked by a unit from the Irish Guards, a spokesman said.

The film showed Guardsmen turning over chemical suits and standing beside piles of shells said to contain the deadly warheads.

For security reasons, the MoD would not locate the bunker beyond saying it was in the middle of an oilfield.

It added that British troops had managed to put out some of the fires started by the Iraqis as part of their "scorched oil" policy.

British Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon said the find "proves categorically" that Iraq is ready to use weapons of mass destruction against allied forces.

The issue of protective gear to Iraqi troops in the south of the country had already indicated that Saddam Hussein may be considering the use of chemical or biological weapons, but fresh evidence uncovered over the past few days had proved it beyond doubt, Mr Hoon said.

He tried to contrast Saddam's readiness to use such weapons with the coalition's efforts to avoid civilian casualties, and repeated claims that missiles that killed at least 14 civilians in Baghdad yesterday may have been Iraqi rather than allied.

Reporters in Baghdad said the missile had almost certainly come from an allied aircraft.

The discovery of the weapons of mass destruction came at a time when British armour was preparing to fight what defence officials said was its biggest tank battle since World War II.

There has been a fear since the campaign started that elite Iraqi troops would be ordered to use chemical or biological weapons.

The well-built bunker shown in the film looked as if it had been occupied by well-equipped soldiers. However, they apparently fled without a fight.

Mr Hoon urged the public not to allow individual setbacks and delays to distract them from the overall picture of the campaign, which, he said. was unfolding successfully.

He said: "Coalition forces are making good progress in overcoming the resistance of the Iraqi security forces with great courage and resilience.

"This campaign is only in its eighth day. We all wish to see a speedy end to conflict.

"The campaign is going to plan. We are, with our coalition partners, involved in a deliberate and cautious endeavour. We will not stop until Saddam Hussein and his appalling regime has fallen from power and weapons of mass destruction are dismantled.

"We have time to see this through. Saddam Hussein's time is running out."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: chemicalwarfare; chemsuits; hunt4smokinggun; illegalweapons; iraq; iraqifreedom; saddamhussein; smokinggun; un; unarmsinspection; unarmsinspectors; unfailure; unitednations; unlegsinspectors; war; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: tiki
That is what I remember too.......the chemical suits....maybe they are awaiting further comfirmation also.
21 posted on 03/27/2003 5:59:59 PM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bisesi
**Haven't heard a thing about this.**

Me either. Unless O'Reilly brushed the surface and dismissed it yesterday.
22 posted on 03/27/2003 6:00:19 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
"Yes it was reported by CBN (not sure if I saw it yesterday on FreeRepublic or this morning) and Mike Savage said he will wait for another source to report on it before he gets excited. "

I heard about this yesterday. Can't remember where.

23 posted on 03/27/2003 6:00:21 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
bumping to follow up later
24 posted on 03/27/2003 6:00:30 PM PST by knak (kelly in alaska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
said contained suspected "weapons of mass destruction".

key word...not too reliable Id say

25 posted on 03/27/2003 6:01:42 PM PST by Gasshog (liberals are Done! someone turn them over and take em off the grill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
I'm sure " Hans 'I am worthless' Blix" mind is racing as to how he is going to find a way to make this stuff disappear too.
26 posted on 03/27/2003 6:02:35 PM PST by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug , Holier-Than-Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VMI70
"Evil Proof" is the headline. I added the stuff in brackets, taken from the article's first sentence.

I should have typed "[Brits Find Bunker Full of Suspected WMD's in S. Iraq Oil Fields]". Sorry about that.
27 posted on 03/27/2003 6:02:45 PM PST by k2blader (If one good thing can be said about the UN, it is that it taught me how to spell “irrelevant.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
Bump to self
28 posted on 03/27/2003 6:04:28 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: All
I would like a reliable source ...in fact a multiple source dog and pony show...BUT,

They have them...make no mistake. They have used them against their own folks and Iran and we have found stashes of gas gear and intercepted alleged orders for the diehards to use them etc.

Does anyone really think they've destroyed all their WMDs?

I sure don't.
30 posted on 03/27/2003 6:05:12 PM PST by wardaddy (G-d speed our fighters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
Very interesting, calling Dr. Blix, uhoh.

Sorry mate, Blix just retired...

31 posted on 03/27/2003 6:07:09 PM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
Maybe a more accurate headline would be "Evil 'Categorical Proof'". :-)
32 posted on 03/27/2003 6:08:14 PM PST by k2blader (If one good thing can be said about the UN, it is that it taught me how to spell “irrelevant.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
I think the stories are being squashed for some reason. I read two other instances of chemweps being reported but there is never a follow up. If were pulling in evidence for G_d's sake go on record. Of course Saddams's not the bad guy in this war.
33 posted on 03/27/2003 6:08:52 PM PST by oyez (This country is too good for some people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
I think the stories are being squashed for some reason. I read two other instances of chemweps being reported but there is never a follow up. If were pulling in evidence for G_d's sake go on record. Of course Saddams's not the bad guy in this war.
34 posted on 03/27/2003 6:08:52 PM PST by oyez (This country is too good for some people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: k2blader; VaBthang4; aristeides; mhking
As soon as the US/Britain announce that they have definitely found WMD's then the public relations reason for Saddam NOT to use them becomes moot. As soon as he's caught, then he loses nothing by using them.

I'm convinced we're not announcing these things so that he will continue NOT to start using them in the early stages of the conflict.

He would have used them in the final stages in any case -- when his back's against the wall -- but why give him reason to use them earlier?

35 posted on 03/27/2003 6:14:20 PM PST by peeve23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k2blader; bluecollarman
Could this be it?
36 posted on 03/27/2003 6:15:37 PM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hoon withdraws claim that protection suits are 'proof' of chemical weapons
By Paul Waugh Deputy Political Editor
28 March 2003

Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, was forced yesterday to retract claims that the discovery of more than 100 bio-chemical protection suits in Iraq was "categorical" proof that Saddam Hussein was preparing to use weapons of mass destruction.

The Ministry of Defence revealed that the Royal Irish Regiment discovered the suits and gas masks, which were in good working order, in a command post abandoned by Iraqi troops in the Rumaila oilfield of southern Iraq.

Mr Hoon originally told a press briefing at the MoD that the find showed categorically that "the Iraqi regime is prepared to use weapons of mass destruction". But when a reporter pointed out that similar suits were used by Iraq in the 1980s to protect against chemical attack from Iran, Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, the Chief of Defence Staff, conceded that the equipment found was not offensive. "There is no evidence so far in what we've found," he said. "They ought to be defensive protection suits and respirators and so forth ... So far we didn't find anything which was offensive, no." The kit was "effective, well cared for and in good working order", he added.

Mr Hoon later admitted that the evidence was "obviously not conclusive" evidence that the Iraqis were set to use chemical weapons against UK or US troops. But he added: "It's clearly indicative of an intention; otherwise why equip his own forces to deal with a threat which he knows we do not have? So it must only be to protect his forces from his own use of those weapons."

Mr Hoon repeated Tony Blair's warning this week that any Iraqi commander who sanctions the use of such weapons would be committing a war crime and "will be held personally responsible for his action".

Iraqi PoWs have given details to US forces of chemical protection suits issued to them, but until now no clear evidence had been found.

The MoD showed a film recorded in recent days of soldiers from the Royal Irish Regiment searching a recently deserted Iraqi command position in the Rumaila oilfield. Sir Michael said the Iraqi troops had "left in a hurry", abandoning equipment and paperwork, which was now being examined by intelligence staff. Sir Michael added that the documentation may offer information about Iraq's plans to use weapons of mass destruction.

"The use of chemical and biological weapons against our forces has always been one of our chief concerns," he said. "We certainly remember the terrible results of their use in the past, and making sure that the regime does not get the opportunity to deploy these weapons has been a high priority in our planning and target selection."

Mr Hoon said no non-lethal chemical weapons such as CS gas had been used in the campaign by the UK. Britain was fully signed up to the Chemical Weapons Convention which prohibited the use of such weapons in conflict.

Independent.co.uk - Hoon withdraws claim that protection suits are 'proof' of chemical weapons

37 posted on 03/27/2003 6:15:51 PM PST by k2blader (If one good thing can be said about the UN, it is that it taught me how to spell “irrelevant.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez
here is yet another story that does not mention the chem weapons

Hoon withdraws claim that protection suits are 'proof' of chemical weapons

38 posted on 03/27/2003 6:17:05 PM PST by knak (kelly in alaska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
Reporters in Baghdad said the missile had almost certainly come from an allied aircraft.

Based on what? I mean, what expertise to these reporters possess? They all have Iraqi Interior Ministry handlers.

39 posted on 03/27/2003 6:17:19 PM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
The "other supposed find" turned out to be a dud. That was the US 3ID.

This is the Brits, a different "find." This sounds a bit more likely, since it is the Daily Telegraph, a published story not an off-the-cuff "Gee, Pat (we know you want ratings so) we're not sure, but we think we found..." sort of thing.
40 posted on 03/27/2003 6:18:52 PM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson