1 posted on
03/27/2003 5:20:04 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
One down 49 more to go.
2 posted on
03/27/2003 5:23:13 AM PST by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Wolfie
O'er the land of the free. Nuff said.
3 posted on
03/27/2003 5:23:17 AM PST by
ricpic
To: Wolfie
In New York the state owns every breath you take? It isn't public air, it's the state govt's air?
To: Wolfie
The Morality Police strike again.
5 posted on
03/27/2003 5:24:18 AM PST by
Pern
(It's good to know who hates you, and it's good to be hated by the right people - Johnny Cash)
To: Wolfie
More power grabbing by the nanny state. Freedom is temporary... This is sickening.
6 posted on
03/27/2003 5:27:30 AM PST by
demkicker
(I wanna kick some commie butt)
To: Wolfie
Pataki spokeswoman Lisa Stoll said that while the governor has reservations about the bill, he signed it super quick "because he believes a statewide ban on smoking in the workplace will lead to a healthier New York and will reduce the cost of health care for New Yorkers." It's wonderful how so-called Republic conservative leaders in our country know exactly what is best for us, honestly I feel much safer today thanks to the sacrifice of such fine leaders.
I can't wait for this illustrious team to determine other sometimes confusing aspects of life like where I should live and what religion is best for our nation, bravo comrades, keep up the good work, America needs you now more than ever, and G-d bless GWB.
8 posted on
03/27/2003 5:32:25 AM PST by
TightSqueeze
(From the Department of Homeland Security, sponsors of Liberty-Lite, Less Freedom! / Red Tape!)
To: Wolfie
Well, I'm all for freedom since I'm a conservative, but since I personally dislike cigarette smoke, more power to them! (/antismoker hypocritic drivel)
To: Wolfie
Pataki spokeswoman Lisa Stoll said that while the governor has reservations about the bill, he signed it super quick "because he believes a statewide ban on smoking in the workplace will lead to a healthier New York and will reduce the cost of health care for New Yorkers."
What a stupid contradiction. You can't be a champion of, and taker of freedom at the same time just to suit your political facade.
To: Wolfie
bump
To: Wolfie
Why can't folks understand the difference between "public buildings" and privately owned buildings that are opened to the "public"?
20 posted on
03/27/2003 5:49:11 AM PST by
Tinman
To: Wolfie
Tyranny seems to be alive and well in N.Y.
The voters are to blame for those they elected are the ones controlling them.
![](http://www.unetix.net/fox.jpg)
21 posted on
03/27/2003 5:53:02 AM PST by
unixfox
(Close the borders, problem solved !)
To: Wolfie
"It's the strongest public-health policy in the state of New York that we've ever had," Fuschillo said. If it is really about our health have the anatomy to prohibit cars, alcohol, junk food, plate glass windows, multi-story buildings, soccer, slippery sidewalks, hot weather, cold weather, running with scissors, chicken bones, anything weighing over 9.7 ounces. . .
22 posted on
03/27/2003 5:53:29 AM PST by
Flyer
(We Own The Streets!!)
To: Wolfie
Man, just reading this article makes me want to light up a defiant cigarette - and I quit years ago!
I guess Big Brother has turned into Big Mamma, knowing what's best for us and making us wash behind our ears and all that. They now form a tag team of motivation and rationalization to take property rights away under the guise of knowing what's best for you.
Pretty soon they'll be requiring you to order vegetables when you go out to eat, and they'll hire some unemployed minders from Saddam Hussein's ex regime to make sure you do so. That'll keep our insurance costs down and all, you see...
To: Wolfie
I can't beleive I campaigned for this guy. All that time wasted going door-to-door and he turns out to be a puppet of the American Lung Association et al.... I'm so disappointed - I should have worked for Golisano!
This is a final nail in the coffin for many struggling bars and restaurants in downtown Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse and Albany. Will local governments be able to assemble to overturn the ban???
26 posted on
03/27/2003 6:07:42 AM PST by
rocky88
To: Wolfie
I wonder if this will apply to Native run Casinos or are they exempt from NY state law and separate sovereign entities?
31 posted on
03/27/2003 6:16:49 AM PST by
xp38
To: Wolfie
36 posted on
03/27/2003 6:25:58 AM PST by
logic101.net
(ALASKA FOR ALASKANS!)
To: Wolfie
I suppose laws against those who spread AIDS to others will soon follow. /sarcasm
41 posted on
03/27/2003 6:33:35 AM PST by
P.O.E.
(God Bless and keep safe our troops.)
To: Wolfie
Seward amd Boelhert voted yes!
44 posted on
03/27/2003 7:02:42 AM PST by
TLBSHOW
To: Wolfie
Those Republicans are at it again, the start of a new prohibition and the reassertion of the states authority to govern the use of private property.
The "public" designation is another redefinition of property by those who have the guns.
To: Wolfie
"because he believes a statewide ban on smoking in the workplace will lead to a healthier New York and will reduce the cost of health care for New Yorkers." Can't think of almost anything that can't be enacted under these guidelines. Banning automobiles would do a better job of attaining these goals.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson