Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US report says soldiers killed in Iraq tried to surrender
Reuters | Wednesday, March 26, 2003

Posted on 03/26/2003 7:51:19 AM PST by JohnHuang2

US report says soldiers killed in Iraq tried to surrender

WASHINGTON, March 26 (Reuters) - One report reaching the U.S. military said that some of the 12 soldiers whose supply convoy was ambushed near Nassiriya in southern Iraq on Sunday were killed by their captors although they tried to surrender, a U.S. defense official said on Wednesday.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the report received from the field said that the U.S. soldiers "weren't given the opportunity to surrender. They attempted to surrender." Some of the U.S. soldiers instead were killed by the Iraqi forces, the official said.

The official did not characterize the nature or reliability of the intelligence information on which this report was based. The official also did not indicate where the surrendering soldiers were slain.

Another defense official said the U.S. military had received "mixed reports" about the incident.

U.S. officials have said an Army supply convoy apparently made a wrong turn during a battle near Nassiriya, and members of an Army maintenance unit were ambushed by Iraqi "irregular forces." U.S. officials say 12 soldiers were missing.

Five U.S. soldiers being held as prisoners were shown being interrogated on Iraqi television. The dead bodies of several others also were shown on Iraqi television. Some of the bodies appeared to have bullet wounds to the forehead, suggestive of possible execution, and were shown sprawled on the floor of a room in puddles of blood.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraqifreedom; kias; surrender; warcrimes
Wednesday, March 26, 2003

Quote of the Day by Mister Magoo

1 posted on 03/26/2003 7:51:20 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I think the moral of the story is that it's better not to surrender to the Iraqis. These were support troops, who evidently weren't expecting to be on the front lines. I don't know if they were even armed, but they certainly should have been in the circumstances. Hopefully this terrible lesson will be taken into account in the future.
2 posted on 03/26/2003 8:19:56 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I can't imagine why any sort of convoy wouldn't be armed. They were probably just not armed as well as their attackers, i.e. a bunch of 5 ton trucks with light machine guns and rifles vs god knows what.
3 posted on 03/26/2003 12:46:18 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
I wonder if having a couple of women present might have caused the men to surrender quicker than usual to protect the women
4 posted on 03/26/2003 12:49:01 PM PST by clamper1797 (Credo Quia Absurdum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Maybe so.
5 posted on 03/26/2003 1:14:13 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson