Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Lifts FBI Criminal Database Checks (NCIC data no longer needs to be "accurate")
AP via Yahoo News ^ | TED BRIDIS

Posted on 03/26/2003 3:31:57 AM PST by eno_

WASHINGTON - The Justice Department (news - web sites) lifted a requirement Monday that the FBI (news - web sites) ensure the accuracy and timeliness of information about criminals and crime victims before adding it to the country's most comprehensive law enforcement database.

The system, run by the FBI's National Crime Information Center, includes data about terrorists, fugitives, warrants, people missing, gang members and stolen vehicles, guns or boats.

Records are queried increasingly by the nation's law enforcement agencies to help decide whether to monitor, detain or arrest someone. The records are inaccessible to the public, and police have been prosecuted in U.S. courts for misusing the system to find, for example, personal information about girlfriends or former spouses.

Officials said the change, which immediately drew criticism from civil-liberties advocates, is necessary to ensure investigators have access to information that can't be confirmed but could take on new significance later, FBI spokesman Paul Bresson said.

The change to the 1974 U.S. Privacy Act was disclosed with an announcement published in the Federal Register.

The Privacy Act previously required the FBI to ensure information was "accurate, relevant, timely and complete" before it could be added to the system.

"It's a pretty big job to be accurate and complete," said Stewart Baker, a Washington lawyer who specializes in technology and surveillance issues. "On the other hand, these are potentially very significant records for people, and if it's not accurate and complete, it can mean trouble."

Critics urged Congress to review the change, arguing that information in the computer files was especially important because it can affect many aspects of a person's life.

"This is information that has always been stigmatizing, the type of data that can prevent someone from getting a job," said Marc Rotenberg of the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center. "When you remove the accuracy obligations, you open the door to the use of unreliable information."

Critics have noted complaints for years about wrong information in the computer files that disrupted the lives of innocent citizens, and the FBI has acknowledged problems. In one case, a Phoenix resident was arrested for minor traffic violations that had been quashed weeks earlier; in another, a civilian was misidentified as a Navy deserter.

The system "is replete with inaccurate, untimely information, but everybody does their best to keep it up to date," said Beryl Howell, former general counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee (news - web sites). "That's a goal we shouldn't just throw out."

In the change, the Justice Department said earlier restrictions on information "would limit the ability of trained investigators and intelligence analysts to exercise their judgment in reporting on investigations and impede the development of criminal intelligence necessary for effective law enforcement."

It added that, because the system collects its data from so many other organizations, "it is administratively impossible to ensure compliance."

___

On the Net: National Crime Information Center: http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cjisd/ncic.htm

Electronic Privacy Information Center: http://www.epic.org/


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doj; fbi; ncic
Don't confuse them with a mind, their facts are made up.
1 posted on 03/26/2003 3:31:57 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eno_
If a credit scorer (Experian, Equifax, etc.) rates you based on false information, and that rating prevents you from getting a loan or otherwise damages your financial reputation, the scorer may be civilly liable. That same precedent MUST hold for a provider of criminal data. I would expect a swarm of lawsuits to descend on the DOJ on these grounds.

I would also expect suits for access. This is information gathered on the public at large and at public expense, so is arguably a fair target under Freedom of Information.

2 posted on 03/26/2003 4:30:36 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vic3O3; cavtrooper21
Get out the inksticks. Time to write the congress critters and complain.

Semper Fi
3 posted on 03/26/2003 6:30:19 AM PST by dd5339 (Lookout Texas here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Wow. Bubba and Hilly could have used with this system a few years back. Think of all the lives that could have been spared if only they could have been blackmailed into acquiescence.
4 posted on 03/26/2003 6:35:27 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_; harpseal; Travis McGee; Squantos; sneakypete; Chapita
I await the "if you have nothing to hide" crowd.
5 posted on 03/26/2003 7:57:05 AM PST by razorback-bert (26 March 2003..."Saddam Hussein still denies he's alive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
Frogs bath water is starting to steam.....Stay safe Bert !
6 posted on 03/26/2003 8:09:32 AM PST by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert; Squantos
If this database is not accurate then what does it matter if one has nothing to hide one will be subject to penalty for their mistake.
7 posted on 03/26/2003 10:32:21 AM PST by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Yep regardless of correct or not they get you arrested , a search of your property associated with the direct surrounding of the arrest and that loving feeling your neighbors will always have of of you and yours via the memory of you being hauled off to the pokey.......legitimate and justifiable or not.

When I was a deputy the NCIC was a solid source for information that departments acted upon. Now the DOJ is pissing in the punch bowl per se ....... Ahhhhhh Justice !.....Stay Safe !!

8 posted on 03/26/2003 11:47:26 AM PST by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Critics have noted complaints for years about wrong information in the computer files that disrupted the lives of innocent citizens, and the FBI has acknowledged problems. In one case, a Phoenix resident was arrested for minor traffic violations that had been quashed weeks earlier; in another, a civilian was misidentified as a Navy deserter.

The US government now official owns you, my friends.

9 posted on 08/15/2006 8:03:49 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson