Replies

In order to judge how women will behave in one type of military unit we can expand from what's gone on in other units. I refer to the long history of women in non-combat forces as they are the example we can extrapolate rom there.

Just because there are healthy young men running around not in uniform doesn't mean we have more able bodies combatants than we need. We have no idea how many of those people have any desire to be in the military much less in combat roles within the military. Proof would be coming from the military in stating they are turning qualified people away en mas.

Now you're saying Maggie Thatcher was a socialist?! I think Reagan might take issue with that.

Nobody had tried giving women the vote either, guess that was a mistake. I've never seen any kid paint a face on a ball, they all throw them, unless they have sticks then they usually hit them, big bouncy balls get kicked. The human mind also progresses over time, as our cultural knowledge increases our mind must change, else we wouldn't be able to comprehend these computing devices we use.

No changes have been noticed to deviate from natures mandate?! Let me introduce you to sex change operations.

But history shows that women CAN rise up to protect their society, we don't have them do it in an organized way but it does happen. The natural order of things is that BOTH genders protect their sociey, often in different ways sometime not.