Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
Actually, the $5,000 reporting requirement is two-fold.

Cuts down on money laundering and makes rax reporting more honest.

If you want large stashes of cash around, but don't want the government to know about it, then you have something else going on entirely.

Otherwise, if it is part of a corporation that you operate, you shouldn't have a problem with it.

If you do, then keep it under your mattress.

You don't have a "right" to be protected from having the government find out if your wealth of cash is drug related or not.
702 posted on 03/25/2003 12:43:03 PM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies ]


To: mabelkitty
Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.



I don't see anything about a warrant for my papers in the PATRIOT banking acts. Read the Bill of Rights before you spout.
709 posted on 03/25/2003 12:47:18 PM PST by m1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies ]

To: mabelkitty
The government could eliminate money laundering tomorrow by changing the color of U.S. currency every couple of years. Stuffing money into a cache in the basement isn't going to do Tony Soprano any good if he has to exchange it at the bank every two years anyway.
723 posted on 03/25/2003 12:57:31 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson