Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Clinton: Bush War Budget Shorts Homeland (THE WITCH IS BACK!!)
WINS News ^ | 3/25/03

Posted on 03/25/2003 7:16:47 AM PST by areafiftyone

SYRACUSE, N.Y. President Bush's proposed budget for fighting Baghdad does not contain enough money for protecting the United States at home, U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday.

Bush is expected to ask Congress for $74.7 billion to pay for the war with Iraq, based on an estimated six months of operations there, and for strengthening counterterrorism efforts at home, lawmakers and aides said Monday. The money measure was dominated by $62.6 billion for the Department of Defense.

The bill also is expected to include about $4.2 billion for domestic security programs, such as assistance for police and other emergency workers.

Clinton said at least 10 percent of the total war budget should go toward homeland security.

''To do less means that we are not recognizing that we are in a two-front war. We are on the offense in Iraq, and we have to finish the job ... But we are also on defense here at home,'' Clinton said after speaking to farmers at a U.S. Department of Agriculture forum in Liverpool, just outside Syracuse.

The New York Democrat has proposed $7 billion for homeland security and has written to President Bush asking him to support the proposal. Her proposal would include $5 billion in direct funding for first responders; $1 billion for an emergency reserve fund that cities and states could tap into in times of heightened threat, discovery of a terrorist cell, or similar emergency need; and $1 billion for ''high-threat'' areas like New York City and Washington.

White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Clinton, a member of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, said she expected Bush's proposal would receive ''overwhelming'' support. She said she agreed the military should be given what it needs for a successful campaign.

''When we start something like this, it is imperative that we see it through,'' she said. ''Not only see it through on the battlefield, but see it through here at home, standing by the men and women who are putting themselves in harm's way.''


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hallofshame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2003 7:16:47 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Artillary Hillary.
2 posted on 03/25/2003 7:18:03 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Any excuse to tax more and further expand the government works for Hitlery. She hopes to head it, someday SOON.
3 posted on 03/25/2003 7:20:17 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Hillarity cares about the defense of the US? Har dee har har!
4 posted on 03/25/2003 7:22:00 AM PST by ricpic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Would like to see the numbers for costs incurred to contain the Peace Riots.
5 posted on 03/25/2003 7:22:12 AM PST by NautiNurse (Usama bin Laden has produced more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Although probably more innately evil, she's not as politically stupid as Dasshole. She searched long and hard for some way to criticize Bush without drawing heat on herself and she came up with this.

Pointless, but crafty.
6 posted on 03/25/2003 7:23:39 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Will someone tell this New York Senator that the war against terror is not lying on the door step of her first responders.

Please tell this din-wit the war on terror should be focused on those that hopefully will be able to better prevent the act of terror and there-fore we will not need to use her first responders.

Her first responders react after the fact. We conservative type would like to prevent the terror act and therefore not use her first responders at all.

Wake up New York. She is part of the problem not the solution

7 posted on 03/25/2003 7:23:46 AM PST by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Let's explore the logic here a bit. By spending money to remove a terrorist regime abroad and using less here at home we are more at risk?

Frankly, over the long run, I'd rather remove the actual disease (Saddam, Bin Laden, etc) instead of just treating the symptom (a couple of terrorists).

8 posted on 03/25/2003 7:24:01 AM PST by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Hillary has never been able to distinguish a philander from a murderer, or a real poisoner and bomber from a hero.



9 posted on 03/25/2003 7:24:50 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
It was just a matter of time before the she-bat from H*ll climbed down to attack the President AGAIN.

Outside of her femiNazi and east/left coast elite circles, Hillary! has no credibility on the issue of national security. She has her "Too-Busy-Raping-And-Staining" husband to thank for that

10 posted on 03/25/2003 7:25:38 AM PST by RooRoobird14 ("Hillary's mouth and ankles are weapons of mass revulsion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
That woman is NO WAY stupid! She is smart as a whip. She knows just where to hit people!
11 posted on 03/25/2003 7:25:54 AM PST by areafiftyone (God Bless George Bush and Tony Blair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
President Bush's proposed budget for fighting Baghdad does not contain enough money for protecting the United States at home, U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday.

Maybe the Senator from NY could ask her lefty friends to stop the disrupting protests across America, saving money, manpower and resources for Homeland Security.

12 posted on 03/25/2003 7:26:54 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
New York City doesn't deserve a nickel of Federal "homeland security" aid as long as it refuses to allow law-abiding citizens to carry firearms in public. This would be far more effective and certainly less costly than having a bunch of cops and National Guard personnel walking around with gas masks and M-16s.
13 posted on 03/25/2003 7:27:50 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricpic
Hillarity cares about the defense of the US?

Actually, I think when (shivver's down the spine) she becomes president she will be a hawk.

I think her presidency, probably the last one ofcourse, will be very unlike her husbands.

14 posted on 03/25/2003 7:28:48 AM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
If her husband had done his job, we wouldn't be in this mess. He reemed the military big time, whimped out in Somalia, kissed Chinese butt, helped PC judges into power so nothing could be done against enemies, etc. Hillary needs to shut up. (okay, I'm done now)
15 posted on 03/25/2003 7:29:26 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You know we now have state troopers riding on our trains. Its like a war zone going into the city. You get off the train and cops are stationed on the bridge connecting the platforms with guns watching the people get off! You feel safe but more nervous!
16 posted on 03/25/2003 7:29:59 AM PST by areafiftyone (God Bless George Bush and Tony Blair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
You know we now have state troopers riding on our trains.

I am not impressed. That should have become a standard security measure the day after the Colin Ferguson incident on the Long Island Rail Road.

17 posted on 03/25/2003 7:32:19 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Would like to see the numbers for costs incurred to contain the Peace Riots.

Fox News had something on their ticker yesterday pertaining to that. It's costing 900K in O.T. alone a day to "manage the protests". Thing is, I don't know if that was nation wide, or highlighting certain areas.

18 posted on 03/25/2003 7:34:58 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
".....does not contain enough money for protecting the United States at home, U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday...."

"When we start something like this...."

All the RATS want is more money sent "home" to the
DemocRAT Party "War Machine". For years the RATs
have kept up their war machine simply for the the local,
state, and national elections....


19 posted on 03/25/2003 7:39:02 AM PST by TRY ONE (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricpic
I am new to this site - Can someone tell me when the NY Fire Department and Police boo'd her and why did they edit the booing out? (Besides the obvious liberal media)
20 posted on 03/25/2003 7:40:49 AM PST by Glacier Honey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson