Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/25/2003 1:42:18 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks; CheneyChick; vikingchick; Victoria Delsoul; WIMom; one_particular_harbour; kmiller1k; ...
Thanks for cathcing this.



2 posted on 03/25/2003 2:04:21 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
If we should bomb a weapons cache - the stuff emits.
3 posted on 03/25/2003 2:20:33 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Can't be, kattracks... Hans Blix told us that he hadn't found any chemical weapons... And that world opinion would go negative on Iraq and Saddam if they were ever used. This report must be false... </sarcasm>
6 posted on 03/25/2003 3:09:07 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds (The Iraqi's have not chosen wisely... now it's the time for the MOAB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"They had old guns but 2002 gas masks, chemical decontamination kits and atropine - an antidote for nerve gas, reported CBS correspondent Jim Axelrod, traveling with the Army's 3d Infantry Division south of Karbala."

First, start with where these masks and kits are coming from and then work backwards and you will find who our friends really are that are assisting this enemy!!

10 posted on 03/25/2003 5:24:03 AM PST by Napoleon Solo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Question regarding some of the possible chemical agents that might be used... are they "heavy" enough to stay around once deployed? Or is it being witheld at the moment due to reported desert winds and sand storms that might blow the stuff back right at the Iraq troops?
Thanks.
11 posted on 03/25/2003 5:30:28 AM PST by Xphantasos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
How is them wearing chem suits NOT a smoking gun?
15 posted on 03/25/2003 7:44:12 AM PST by smith288 (Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
bump
16 posted on 03/25/2003 7:45:27 AM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
no, not them. they don't have any chem weapons.

didn't hans and the french assure us of that?

sickening!!
18 posted on 03/25/2003 8:54:16 AM PST by faithincowboys (Hate The French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Desperate evil men will do desperate evil things. We should expect a WMD attack to whatever degree Saddam's forces can deliver one.
21 posted on 03/25/2003 9:01:41 AM PST by TADSLOS (Sua Sponte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I think some nukes would vaporize all toughs chemicals in Baghdad
22 posted on 03/25/2003 9:04:01 AM PST by AlmightySR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
But Sodamninsane and all the anti-americans say they don't have WMD!!!!!!!!!!!
28 posted on 03/25/2003 10:31:51 AM PST by Duckdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson