Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Morning Papers - The Front Pages, 25 March 2003
Sky News ^ | March 25, 2003

Posted on 03/24/2003 5:32:35 PM PST by Dont Mention the War

The Daily Star talks of our "brave heroes" - the SAS. The paper claims that members of the elite group of troops are already on the streets of Baghdad. Oh and there is a picture of a girl in a bikini.

The Sun shows a British tank poised to attck Baghdad with the Allied army set to do battle with Saddam Hussein's elite Republican Guard. It uses the headline: "Saddam's Last Stand."

The Daily Express is also looking at the main push towards Baghdad. It uses a picture of allied troops ready to go over the top.

US and British warplanes, guided by special forces soldiers on the ground, have begun an intense bombardment of major Republican Guard bunkers outside Baghdad, according to the Guardian.

American and British forces have launched more punishing attacks on the Republican Guard divisions around Baghdad according to The Independent. These come ahead of the looming battle for the Iraqi capital.

The crucial push for Baghdad was under way according to The Times. Allied forces have bombarded the Republican Guard and started to zero in on President Saddam Hussein.

The Financial Times also concentrates on the battle for Baghdad. It says US forces, closing on Baghdad, have begun pounding Republican Guard units protecting the city.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: britain; dailyexpress; dailymail; dailystar; dailytelegraph; endgameapproaches; financialtimes; fleetstreet; independent; mirror; morningpapers; sun; thedailyexpress; thedailymail; thedailystar; thedailytelegraph; theguardian; theindependent; themirror; thesun; thetimes; times; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Aww, no Daily Mirror. A darn shame, that.

Good Morning Britain!

1 posted on 03/24/2003 5:32:35 PM PST by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Oh, wait, I found it. Lucky me.


2 posted on 03/24/2003 5:34:30 PM PST by Dont Mention the War
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
But they're not POW's.

POW's are uniformed. These are simply terrorists.

Let their bones be filled with hot lead. The Mirror editorial staff too.
3 posted on 03/24/2003 5:36:52 PM PST by Republicanus_Tyrannus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republicanus_Tyrannus
I meant "MOLTEN LEAD". Sorry for that vague terminology.
4 posted on 03/24/2003 5:38:11 PM PST by Republicanus_Tyrannus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Pretty big change in coverage (except for the Mirror).

Thanks and prayers for our UK allies!

5 posted on 03/24/2003 5:38:42 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War; MadIvan
The Brits have been terrific in this campaign!
6 posted on 03/24/2003 5:43:56 PM PST by justshe (FREE MIGUEL !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Is Michelle of the Daily Star Officer or Enlisted Personnel?
7 posted on 03/24/2003 5:48:14 PM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Hey, most of them are positive today! Bravo!
8 posted on 03/24/2003 5:50:11 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Corporal, very corporal.
9 posted on 03/24/2003 5:59:43 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
That is obviously not a regulation SAS uniform.

I would say that some minor punishment would be appropriate.

10 posted on 03/24/2003 6:03:08 PM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War; MadIvan
The Mirror really needs to sod off.
11 posted on 03/24/2003 6:17:23 PM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ewing
Since we are talking ranks, perhaps major punishment?
12 posted on 03/24/2003 7:06:00 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Only 450 tanks? I thought we had more tanks than that.
13 posted on 03/24/2003 8:24:39 PM PST by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kesg
Too bad our "Force 21" got dicked over by Turkey
14 posted on 03/24/2003 8:26:20 PM PST by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SShultz460
Yeah, the 4th ID guys are my neighbors. The army surplus stores were very busy this weekend.
15 posted on 03/24/2003 8:32:16 PM PST by centexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Thanks but I'd really like to see page three from all the above papers.
16 posted on 03/24/2003 8:33:05 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Is the daily Mirror on the side of Islamofascists?

Gitmo detainees are treated better than the marines are down there. No Gitmo detainee was ever beaten, their food needs were catered to very well, none made to be used for propoganda, none tortured, unlike the POWs in Iraq.

Of course what do you expect from a country that lies to its own people and tortures them to death. The human 'shredder' and shooting parents in from of kids, raping wives in front of husbands - sickening. Yet they do it to their own people. My heart goes out to the POWs, the are prisoners of a very sadistic bunch.
17 posted on 03/24/2003 8:54:55 PM PST by WOSG (Liberate Iraq! Lets Roll! now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fso301
LOL ...

And we really appreciate the Daily Star.

NYT would have a real step up if they went in that direction.
18 posted on 03/24/2003 8:55:39 PM PST by WOSG (Liberate Iraq! Lets Roll! now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kesg
I think they are talking BRITISH tanks.

Look at the number of soldiers, we have 3 times that many over there.

19 posted on 03/24/2003 9:33:18 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
I think they are talking BRITISH tanks.

Look at the number of soldiers, we have 3 times that many over there.

Okay, makes sense.

20 posted on 03/24/2003 10:32:21 PM PST by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson