Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In addition, a number of people posted an article from the Sydney Morning Herald a few days ago entitled 'Dead bodies are everywhere' - Herald Correspondent Lindsay Murdoch, travelling with a Marines artillery unit, reports on one of the war's first battles on the Iraq-Kuwait border. It too falsely alleged napalm use. Well, they had to tack a retraction onto the bottom of their story after it was published. I posted the following at the bottom of all those threads:

The Sydney Morning Herald has been caught lying so many times - including the intentional alteration of wire service articles to change their meaning - that it should NEVER be trusted on anything.

The following was subsquented tacked onto the end of this story:

The Pentagon subsequently issued a statement to the Herald:

Your story ('Dead bodies everywhere', by Lindsay Murdoch, March 22, 2003) claiming US forces are using napalm in Iraq, is patently false. The US took napalm out of service in the early 1970s. We completed destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm. - Jeff A. Davis, Lieutenant Commander, US Navy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense.

The SMH lies. ALWAYS.
1 posted on 03/23/2003 5:06:32 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Timesink
Too bad we don't use napalm. These scum need
to burn a little befor they go to hell.
2 posted on 03/23/2003 5:14:02 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (chIRAQ & sadDAM are bedfellows & clinton is a raping traitor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Just wexactly what is wrong with napalm. I can say from first hand obsrvation that it is very effective.
Good stuff--sticks to kids!
3 posted on 03/23/2003 5:23:08 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
We completed destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm.

I'm sure they still have the recipe. Might be just the thing for the Republican Guard.

5 posted on 03/23/2003 5:28:49 PM PST by ToTheStars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
While the article in question did use the word "napalm" the reference was to fuel-air ordinance which the US does use.

Fuel-air weapons are or are not legal/ethical depending on your point of view and the Aussey article lumped them into the same ethical catagory (non discriminant, area wide weapons) as the earlier, outlawed variant.

7 posted on 03/23/2003 5:34:40 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
bump
9 posted on 03/23/2003 5:49:48 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
More info here on napalm or "firebombs":
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/mk77.htm
10 posted on 03/23/2003 6:24:36 PM PST by norcalvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Where there will be gnashing of teeth and their thirst will never be quenched. Whoa to these evil men who leave this world with the blood of innocents they’ve tortured and those they’ve killed without remorse.
11 posted on 03/23/2003 7:05:23 PM PST by Victor K ("There was a man, who came from God. They called him John." John 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson