Skip to comments.
Regime falling to pieces, Blair told
The Daily Telegraph ^
| March 24, 2003
| Toby Helm
Posted on 03/23/2003 4:36:12 PM PST by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: ReaganRevolution; MadIvan
President Bush rocks, indeed! And so does Tony Blair! :)
Thanks Ivan! :)
To: MadIvan
Tnaks to you, UK troops and your fellow freedom loving friends in the UK.
Rest of them, try to miss the loo & mess on their feet.
22
posted on
03/23/2003 5:07:17 PM PST
by
listenhillary
(May the peace pissants soon be shamed by the free Iraqi's)
To: Pamlico
...but I have always felt that her eldest son has had trouble thinking clearly. From what I've read, Prince Charles is against the war.
To: MadIvan
Ivan - any comments from Her Majesty yet?
FRegards,
To: Churchillspirit
Her Majesty's website has no updates since March 20th, when she wrote to the Forces.
Regards, Ivan
25
posted on
03/23/2003 5:17:12 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
Thanks.
She can, of course, identify with the concern of the families at home, having worried about Prince Andrew during the Falklands War.
Apparently Her Majesty has a hard and fast rule that she will not accept any telephone calls during dinner, but she relaxed that rule whilst Andrew was with the task force.
God bless all our troops - UK and US and give strength to their families.
FRegards,
To: MadIvan
"
Regime falling to pieces, Blair told"
May it be true!
27
posted on
03/23/2003 5:52:38 PM PST
by
_Jim
(//NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR\\)
To: tiki
we are civilized and hurting for our fallen men and their families.If we were less civilized, we would have NO coalition casualties. The rest of the world needs to remember that and be grateful.
28
posted on
03/23/2003 6:02:28 PM PST
by
Maceman
To: ReaganRevolution
Yeah, I couldn't help noticing that it sounded too easy; although I was happy things were going well so far. However, in the back of my mind; I was aware that there may be still Iraqi troops that were still loyal to Saddam. They aren't in the majority, but still numerous in many places. I even had a weird feeling that all those (Iraqi) soldiers wouldn't just roll over for us. Many would surrender, honestly. But there are a lot who, for reasons of their own, still support him.
29
posted on
03/23/2003 7:13:08 PM PST
by
dsutah
To: Chi-townChief
Is it too soon to start considering Baghdad? If the Iraqis put up a strong resistance, how do our guys capture it without destroying it.... Is there really any reason to capture Baghdad?
30
posted on
03/23/2003 7:17:28 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: MadIvan
Now only idiots wouldn't bet on the Americans and the British. And the Idiots are: France, Russia, China, Germany, Mexico, Belgium, and of course the media.
31
posted on
03/23/2003 7:24:20 PM PST
by
Porterville
(Screw the grammar, full posting ahead.)
To: MadIvan
BTTT
32
posted on
03/23/2003 8:44:23 PM PST
by
hattend
(Dixie Chicks suck)
To: r9etb
That's a great question; I would think so unless the Saddamites get tossed out by the people there first.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson