Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudis tell Bush: take a breather, give UN another try
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | March 24, 2003

Posted on 03/23/2003 3:50:48 PM PST by sarcasm

Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister, Prince Saud al Faisal, has urged the United States to "have a breather" in its invasion of Iraq and give the United Nations another chance to disarm the country peacefully.

"Stop the war, let's sit down, let's have a breather after what we have seen of the destruction," Prince Saud told Western journalists in the Saudi capital of Riyadh.

The 61-year-old prince also called on Saddam Hussein to "start to think of the sacrifices he can make for his country", implying that the Iraqi leader should seek exile rather than see his country destroyed.

While Saudi Arabia has not offered sanctuary to Saddam, Prince Saud said the Iraqi leader and his family would be allowed safe passage through the kingdom to reach a third country. Neighbouring Bahrain has offered to shelter Saddam. Saudi Arabia has been a vocal critic of Washington's war plans since they were first discussed a year ago.

Like many countries in the region, it fears the conflict could destabilise its own society, which is struggling with a volatile mix of high unemployment and religious extremism among its youth.

Saudi Arabia's position is particularly sensitive because the US Air Force commander in charge of the bombing campaign in Iraq is stationed at a Saudi Air Force base just south of the capital - a fact not discussed by the local press or widely known to Saudi citizens.

Prince Saud condemned the invasion's aim of destroying the Iraqi Government as "outside of the framework of international legality", and warned that rebuilding what has been destroyed will be a dangerous, difficult task.

"Bringing it back again is going to be a job I don't envy those who are going to be handed it," he said.

He said he was worried about talk of a military occupation government, and that he doubted the ability of US and British officials to finesse the web of tribal and ethnic relationships that any government in Iraq must handle to maintain peace.

"We don't think that is advisable at all," the prince said. "The government we would like to see in Iraq after the war is the government that is formed by the Iraqi people."

He called on the UN Security Council to take up the Iraq issue again without delay, both to try and stop the fighting and to decide how to manage Iraq after the conflict.

"It just seems to me it will be a very tough situation to handle unless the United Nations comes to the fore in this and gets whoever is there from the present government to co-operate with them for the process of what they call democratisation," he said.

The Saudi Government has said it will not send troops to Iraq, but the prince said it would consider contributing peacekeeping forces if asked by the United Nations and Iraq.

Prince Saud also repeated his Government's long-standing plea for the US to help solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, "which has been at the heart of the problems and the troubles in the region".

"If there is stability, if there is peace in the Middle East, that is the way that will bring about a democratisation and an opening of society," the prince said, "not through war."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alfaisal; saudalfaisal; saudiarabia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: sarcasm
"Stop the war, let's sit down, let's have a breather after what we have seen of the destruction," Prince Saud told . . .

We didn't light the fire. But like General Franks said: if they [Iraqis] use WMD, we have won.

41 posted on 03/23/2003 4:20:34 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Prince Saud al Faisal is cordially invited to sleep with his cammels.
42 posted on 03/23/2003 4:20:52 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (*When the chips are down, the buffalo is empty*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Saudis are not so stupid. This is shuck and jive for the Arab "street".
43 posted on 03/23/2003 4:26:33 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Wouldn't that be cruelty to animals?
44 posted on 03/23/2003 4:28:13 PM PST by RichInOC (What did that poor camel do to deserved getting humped by a Saudi prince?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: teletech
President Bush should tell the Saudi's to TAKE A HIKE. We CANNOT do anything less than to forge ahead to victory so these soldiers would not have died or suffered in a POW camp in vain!!!!
45 posted on 03/23/2003 4:29:21 PM PST by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Is he serious? Man, that is my worse fear, that bush mayleave this half way. Not after what had happened today with our boys. No matter what this must be seen to the other side.
46 posted on 03/23/2003 4:30:18 PM PST by Minty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Essen Sie Scheisse und sterben Sie - german

Mangez la merde et mourez - frog

No russian character support, sorry

Translations courtesy of BabelFish @ Altavista

47 posted on 03/23/2003 4:34:48 PM PST by The_Sword_of_Groo (Taste the sword of Groo...One taste per customer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Too late! But we do have a response... and it's spelled M-O-A-B!

These people should be happy that we are restraining from using Nukes!

48 posted on 03/23/2003 4:37:32 PM PST by ReleaseTheHounds (The Iraqi's have not chosen wisely... now it's the time for the MOAB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
That's a dumb idea.
49 posted on 03/23/2003 4:43:10 PM PST by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EvilOverlord
Well-stated. There is no substitute for victory. I fear "Shock and Awe" and an antiseptic war where we care more about the welfare of the enemy's civilans than the enemy will cost us more dead and wounded. Funny, but we didn't win WWII with those concerns. Mass warfare is about breaking the will of the enemy. It is impossible to separate the civilian population from military capabilities. It is more humane to make the war as short and violent as possible.
50 posted on 03/23/2003 4:47:10 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Hey, saudi - go try this out.

And take your EU pals with you.

51 posted on 03/23/2003 5:02:03 PM PST by Cachelot (~ In waters near you ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Take a breather?

Take a flying leap!
52 posted on 03/23/2003 5:09:13 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson