Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's guerrillas thwart U.S. river crossing
Reuters | Sunday, March 23, 2003 | By Sean Maguire

Posted on 03/23/2003 8:03:18 AM PST by JohnHuang2

Saddam's guerrillas thwart U.S. river crossing

By Sean Maguire

NEAR NASSIRIYA, March 23 (Reuters) - U.S. Marines battled Iraqi guerrillas for control of the southern Iraqi city of Nassiriya on Sunday, taking "significant" casualties in a fight to open a route north to Baghdad, U.S. officers said.

Reuters Correspondent Sean Maguire, travelling with the Marines First Regiment south of the city, said he could see explosions and huge plumes of smoke over Nassiriya, on the Euphrates river about 375 km (225 miles) southeast of Baghdad.

"It looks like artillery, or possibly air strikes," Maguire said. "There's lots of smoke rising."

After nightfall, fires were still burning near the bridges.

U.S. field officers said the Marine battalion spearheading the fight had suffered significant casualties in a battle with irregular guerrilla fighters known as Saddam's Fedayeen.

They gave no details but a CNN television correspondent at Nassiriya quoted eyewitnesses in the battle as saying they had seen at least 10 American bodies around an amphibious assault vehicle that had been hit by a rocket-propelled grenade.

Al-Jazeera television aired Iraqi footage of at least four corpses that appeared to be those of U.S. servicemen and of five U.S. prisoners it said were taken in fighting near Nassiriya.

The firefight with the Fedayeen at Nassiariya blocked an advance by U.S. forces, who had earlier reported securing two key bridgeheads to enable them to cross the Euphrates and strike northwards towards the Iraqi capital.

Maguire said U.S. officers believed the bridgeheads were now secure but that the area in between was not. U.S. troops captured the northern ends of the two bridges in the east of Nassiriya early on Sunday, opening the way for large forces to cross and head north toward the Tigris river and Baghdad.

But units of Saddam's Fedayeen, an irregular militia force of loyalists to President Saddam Hussein, counterattacked.

"They've been fighting all day. They're using guerrilla tactics," one officer said on Sunday evening.

SURRENDER REPORT

Maguire said there was heavy U.S. helicopter traffic over the area, and that hundreds of U.S. military trucks and armoured personnel carriers had stopped their advance.

U.S. officers also said that the 11th Division of the Iraqi army had "capitulated." That report could not be confirmed, and no details on the alleged surrender were available.

Iraqi officials on Saturday denied U.S. statements that the commander of the 51st Division had surrendered and a U.S. commander said his forces had fought and defeated elements of the 51st around the southern city of Basra.

Iraqi Information Minister Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf told a news conference in Baghdad that foreign invaders headed to Nassiriya had been "taught a lesson they will never forget."

"We have placed them in a quagmire from which they can never emerge except dead," he said.

Speeding columns of the U.S. Third Infantry have covered nearly two thirds of the 500 km (300 miles) from the Kuwaiti border in two days before running into Iraqi resistance near Najaf on the southwest bank of the Euphrates.

A strike north across the river towards the Tigris river and Baghdad could create a pincer movement on the capital.

U.S. officers believe units of President Saddam Hussein's elite Republican Guards face them near Najaf -- the Medina Division -- and at other cities south of Baghdad, like Kut on the Tigris, where the Baghdad Division is thought to be based.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: embeddedreport; nassiriya; surrender; warlist
Sunday, March 23, 2003

Quote of the Day by Erasmus

1 posted on 03/23/2003 8:03:18 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Geez. When did Reuters become so anti-American?
2 posted on 03/23/2003 8:06:00 AM PST by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
>Geez. When did Reuters become so anti-American?

Its a German company owned by arabs.

3 posted on 03/23/2003 8:10:10 AM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Someone in the Iraqi army has been reading up. They know that the greatest danger to rapid advance is attacks on the line of communications. Since they regular forces can be detected by E-8 JSTARS, they will harry the LOC with small units using RPGs or fire mortars which they will rapidly abandon. Maybe command detonated mines, similar to Claymores, too.

It wouldn't materially hurt a force of this size, but it would cause casualties. It would force the deployment of a large security element. It would impose a delay. What is now, Baghdad by Tuesday? It was scheduled for Monday yesterday.

I suppose the textbook solution is to damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead. Ignore the press carping, endure the casualties, endure the captures. Endure the videos. Press ahead and take down the regime. That in the end is the quickest way to reduce casualties and recover prisoners.
4 posted on 03/23/2003 8:13:20 AM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
I suppose the textbook solution is to damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead. Ignore the press carping, endure the casualties, endure the captures. Endure the videos. Press ahead and take down the regime. That in the end is the quickest way to reduce casualties and recover prisoners.

The textbook solution does not include journalists embedded with every other military unit...

5 posted on 03/23/2003 8:18:18 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Richard Tregaskis and Ernie Pyle were "embedded". They just didn't come up with the word yet.
6 posted on 03/23/2003 8:21:15 AM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eala
When haven't they been?
7 posted on 03/23/2003 8:22:36 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
It was a fundamentally different, instant video vs. delayed print with the potential for thoughtful censorship.
8 posted on 03/23/2003 8:24:24 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
You may disagree, but I believe that the Iraqi executions of Americans will strengthen, rather than weaken our will. A lot of people thought Saddam was a cartoon character villain. After today, the hatred will be personal. If we had waited for some bowlderized, PC, sanitized account released 3 months after the fact, the fact of these men's sacrifice would essentially be in vain.

I think it is good policy for the public to know, within the limits of military security, what is going on.
9 posted on 03/23/2003 8:31:32 AM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
I do disagree. Embedded journalists can only accomplish one task whenever the military going gets tough - get in the way. The only thing they're good for is to broadcast images of well-treated POWs & celebrating locals, which doesn't require their front-line positions.
10 posted on 03/23/2003 8:38:23 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
These images of Iraqi executions were not taken by embedded journalists, nor would embedded journalists be in a position to take such images..
11 posted on 03/23/2003 8:39:27 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
12 posted on 03/23/2003 8:56:28 AM PST by Free the USA (Stooge for the Rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson