To: dinok
This is a death penalty case, isn't it?
16 posted on
03/22/2003 8:58:04 PM PST by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(Too many people around here really need Charm School.)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I beleive so...UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) can get mid-evil under war conditions.
I heard on FOX earlier that 9 out of the 13 Muslim military chaplains are of the wahabi style Islam of Saudi Arabia and Al Queda.
What is the defence department thinking hiring them?
25 posted on
03/22/2003 9:01:23 PM PST by
dinok
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
"This is a death penalty case, isn't it?"This is the definitive death penalty case in the military.
36 posted on
03/22/2003 9:04:53 PM PST by
F16Fighter
(Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; All
Does anybody know how to link all the threads here? I can't do it with my skill level. There are 3 plus this one.
55 posted on
03/22/2003 9:10:37 PM PST by
floriduh voter
("Pound that Rock" John Gruden, Super Bowl Night 2003)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Punitive Articles of the UCMJ
Article 106a Espionage
(1) Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to any entity described in paragraph (2), either directly or indirectly, anything described in paragraph (3) shall be punished as a court-martial may direct, except that if the accused is found guilty of an offense that directly concerns (A) nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large scale attack, (B) war plans, (C) communications intelligence or cryptographic information, or (D) any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy, the accused shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
Punitive Articles of the UCMJ
Article 90—Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer
(1) strikes his superior commissioned officer or draws or lifts up any weapon or offers any violence against him while he is in the execution of his office; or
(2) willfully disobeys a lawful command of his superior commissioned officer; shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, and if the offense is committed at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.
63 posted on
03/22/2003 9:14:50 PM PST by
Kozak
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
This is a death penalty case, isn't it?Yes. And lest people get confused, it does not matter if any soldiers died in this attack. The attack itself is treason by a member of the armed forces in the face of the enemy.
The maximum penalty is death by firing squad.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson