Besides the text of the article itself, and the fact that it currently the top story at CBSNews.com, note well:
- This was sent out as a breaking news alert by CBS News, even though it is obviously not breaking news:
From: "CBSNews---Breaking_News"
Date: Sat Mar 22, 2003 3:18:59 PM America/New_York
Subject: CBSNews.com Alert! Toughest Fighting Ahead?U.S. forces may soon face heaviest opposition yet on the southern approach to Baghdad guarded by Iraqi Republican Guards, troops most likely to fight hard and use chemical weapons, reports CBS News' David Martin.
- Note selective, America-hate pull quote
1 posted on
03/22/2003 1:57:27 PM PST by
Timesink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: *CCRM; *war_list; *Lamestream Media; MEDIANEWS
bump for bump lists
2 posted on
03/22/2003 1:59:53 PM PST by
Timesink
(If you use the word "embedded" around me, you'd better be carrying an x-ray.)
To: Timesink
Iraq's best ain't jack. We shouldn't get complacent, but I know we'll nail them. The Iraqi military wants to mess with the best and, to their detriment, they'll get their wish. They'll wind up wishing they'd stayed home.
To: Timesink
The latest CBS News/New York Times poll shows Americans are feeling optimistic about the progress of the war in Iraq, but they believe President Bush hasn't been clear about all the possible consequences of military action.This is what drives me nuts about the media. Anyone with a functioning brain doesn't need the President to explain the 'consequences of war' to them.
To: Timesink
E-Lights, won't last as long as the Alamo, I'd reckon.
8 posted on
03/22/2003 2:08:04 PM PST by
Waco
To: Timesink
Firepower like no other!!!
Any battle out in the open will be over quickly....
9 posted on
03/22/2003 2:08:13 PM PST by
BobP
To: Timesink
call in the airstrikes ... Daisy Cutters if they refuse to surrender peacefully ... terrible to say but I'd rather save American and British soldiers ... guess they could drop a Daisy Cutter a mile or two away as a warning ...
there's no rush ... do it right ...
10 posted on
03/22/2003 2:10:05 PM PST by
Bobby777
To: Timesink
"U.S. May Face Elite Iraqi Troops"
Oh NO! We better send in the local girl scout troops to take care of them!
11 posted on
03/22/2003 2:10:17 PM PST by
Enemy Of The State
(Tell those F@#KERS with the laundry on their heads that It's wash day and we're bringing the maytag!)
To: Timesink
The chief difference between the division that surrendered yesterday and the Republican Guard is that the first consisted of Shiite conscripts who didn't want to fight in the first place and hate Saddam, whereas the Republican Guard troops are bullies who are complicit in Saddam's tyranny. But they won't fight effectively. Instead of surrendering, they are more likely to run, as they did in the first Gulf War.
12 posted on
03/22/2003 2:10:44 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Timesink
Iraqi Republican Guards, troops most likely to fight hard and use chemical weapons CBS' Dan Rather got it straight from the Camel's Anus that Iraq has no chemical weapons.
Just to be safe, march Dan Rather on point as we approach Baghdad.
Per his reporting he should have nothing to fear.
13 posted on
03/22/2003 2:11:05 PM PST by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: Timesink
On the way to...
![](http://www.m-ries.com/images/bradley tanks.jpg)
22 posted on
03/22/2003 2:25:25 PM PST by
The Louiswu
(Get some!!!)
To: Timesink
Should the Republican Guard chose to there could be a battle..... But why would the Coalition Forces chose to fight a pitched battle with them when we have the aerial superiority and capability to do to them what was done to Saddam's Palaces in Baghdad. I think if the RG decides to wage a battle then 'shock & awe' will be brought to bear upon them like they've never dreamed.
Same with street battles in Baghdad.... why fight. Surround the city and stop all things going in such as supplies (food)..... take out a few key locations but easily replaced things such as pumps (water), transmission lines (electricity), then sit and wait. They can't survive forever. At some point they will have to come out.
Just my opinion.
23 posted on
03/22/2003 2:30:30 PM PST by
deport
(Fermez la bouche, Monsieur Daschle)
To: Timesink
If Iraq has elite forces, the forces of the US are SUPER ELITE. Superior in every respect bar none.
24 posted on
03/22/2003 2:30:38 PM PST by
chainsaw
To: Timesink
Right from the gate the reports have been it will get tougher the closer the troops get to Baghdad. I trust Tommy Franks, Condi Rice, President Bush and all to know what the hell they are doing. This compaign has been brilliant.
25 posted on
03/22/2003 2:32:56 PM PST by
Conservative4Ever
(got the new computer, touch pad, keyboard learning blues)
To: Timesink
Sorry about that, but your headline breaks the first rule of good reporting. It is not backed up fact in the story.
It may be your opinion that CBS is "praying for blood" but please, with all respect, don't state that as a fact unless the story backs it up, and this one does not.
Secondly, where is the "America-hate" pull quote? The story seems pretty straightforward to me. The reality is that there is a lot of heavy fighting yet to do, and the fighting will get harder, and the opposition get better, as we close on their SOG.
Trust me, two tours in RVN doing LRRPs and covering a few wars as a reporter, I have learned it's never easy. Some of this armchair bravado posting stuff (not yours) is BS, and almost an insult to the grunts on the line who are being shot as we write.
We will win, but underestiating the enemy is fatal.
29 posted on
03/22/2003 2:37:06 PM PST by
MindBender26
(.....and for more news as it happens...stay tuned to your local FReeper station....)
To: Timesink
CBS News now reports possible terrorist attack in Kuwait.SSix injured.Don't know if it was a motar or grenade.
To: Timesink
Never forget what Stormin' Normnn said about the Elite Republican Guard, "Elite is a relative term".
32 posted on
03/22/2003 2:41:24 PM PST by
Straight Vermonter
(http://www.angelfire.com/ultra/terroristcorecard/index.html)
To: Timesink
If we have Abrams M-1, it won't be any different.. They die*
To: Timesink
Iraqi officials said more than 200 people have been injured in the bombing so far. One death has been confirmed.According to liberals, the economic sanctions of the past twelve years have killed over two hundred thousand Iraqi children.
The problem with the liberal viewpoint is that food and other necessities have been supplied to Iraq by the international aid community, and furthermore Iraq has been able to sell its oil in exchange for foodstuffs. So if children have been dying, it ain't because of the sanctions. It's because of Saddam. Saddam has been killing forty children a day, sixteen thousand a year, two hundred thousand in all for twelve years.
Now, if two hundred soldiers dead now stops two hundred thousand children from dying over the next twelve years, who's to say that's a bad thing?
40 posted on
03/22/2003 3:49:54 PM PST by
JoeSchem
To: Timesink
I fart on your beards.
Bend over and kiss it good-bye Iraq.
41 posted on
03/22/2003 3:54:57 PM PST by
lodwick
( Live free or die)
To: Timesink
Imagine these "Elite Troops" hunkered down waiting to be attacked by colums of tanks, mobile artillery and 20,000 other elite troops. If you withdraw you will be shot and your family killed. If you fire your artillery it will be immediately destroyed. When it is dark they can see you but you are blind. They have food and water and shoes, you do not.
The attackers have complete air superiority with weapons like hypobaric bombs, gun ships and guided bombs you have no way to shoot them down.
Yep, I'll bet the Iraqis can hardly wait.
42 posted on
03/22/2003 3:55:14 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Ding, Dong Soddom is DEAD)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson