To: doug from upland
Send Pelosi to Baghdad as a guest of Sadamn (she only has about a week tops to make the trip). Then if she's alive, she can decide. What a commie b*tch!
V
2 posted on
03/21/2003 9:57:32 AM PST by
Beck_isright
( V ......................... use this instead of bttt... for victory)
To: doug from upland
Oh, man, these California RATs are out of control. Dennis Prager HAS to run for the Senate. That Barbara Boxer is just as bad as Pelousy.
3 posted on
03/21/2003 9:58:55 AM PST by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: doug from upland
Every man must be for the United States or against it. There can be no neutrals in this war, only patriots - or traitors. - Sen. Stephen Douglas, 1861
7 posted on
03/21/2003 10:05:40 AM PST by
Defiant
("I don't want to kill you, and you don't want to be dead"--Bush, to Iraq)
To: doug from upland
They are pretty close to being traitors, IMO. Lots of them are socialists, esp. Pelosi, I think. That makes 'em traitors to me, since the adoption of socialism would mean the destruction of the principles of freedom that are America.
9 posted on
03/21/2003 10:07:27 AM PST by
Sam Cree
To: doug from upland
Found myself praying this morning that God would remove her from the public stage ASAP as well . . . . along with Byrd, Dashdull, Bwitch Shrillary and Dillbo, T Kennedy.
Any other prime candidates for God's discipline among the traitorous politicos?
14 posted on
03/21/2003 10:15:29 AM PST by
Quix
(MARCH BIBLE CODES DIGEST LATEST RESEARCH COMPARES WAR AND PEACE VS BIBLE W SURPRISES 4 BOTH SIDES)
To: doug from upland
The aide said that the congressman supports the troops. No, no. Who does she want to win the war? Finally, the aide said --- "I don't knowI don't think the troops welcome support from those who simultaneously bash their commander in chief.
The democrats have put themselves in the position of losing politically if the US wins the war.
To: doug from upland
This sounds like more ammo for 2004.
To: doug from upland
In times past, such a stance, particularly by a major public figure, would indeed have been considered treasonous. I hope there is at least a congressional motion to censure Pelosi and her Leftist ilk who publicly oppose the well being of US citizens in this way.
To: doug from upland
bump
To: doug from upland
"The caller asked the aide whom Pelosi wanted to win the war. The aide said that the congressman supports the troops. No, no. Who does she want to win the war? Finally, the aide said --- "I don't know."
. . .no doubt, if Dashole were honest, he would have the same difficulty expressing his feelings as to who should win. . .and all the Lib traitors for that matter.
Would rather be banning the treasonous Libs in our own Country than worrying about our French connections right now. . .
19 posted on
03/22/2003 6:06:51 AM PST by
cricket
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson