Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Dead bodies are everywhere' ... Saddam's first martyrs lost
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | March 22 2003 | Lindsay Murdoch

Posted on 03/21/2003 7:05:01 AM PST by dead

Herald Correspondent Lindsay Murdoch, travelling with a Marines artillery unit, reports on one of the war's first battles on the Iraq-Kuwait border.

There was little initial resistance as the United States Marines swept into southern Iraq early yesterday. One of the first encounters of the ground war was more like a massacre than a fight.

The Iraqi gunners fired first, soon after United States President George Bush announced the attack on Saddam Hussein was under way.

It was a fatal mistake.

The Iraqi artillery unit, preparing for the American invasion, had tested the range by firing registering shots at a likely spot where the American tanks would cross from Kuwait. US radar picked up the incoming shells and pinpointed their source.

Within hours, the Iraqi gunners and their Russian-made 122mm howitzers were destroyed as the Americans unleashed an artillery barrage that shook the ground and lit up the night sky with orange flashes.

"Dead bodies are everywhere," a US officer reported by radio.

Later in the day, the American firepower was turned on Safwan Hill, an Iraqi military observation post a couple of kilometres across the border. About six hours after US marines and their 155mm howitzer guns pulled up at the border, they opened up with a deafening barrage. Safwan Hill went up in a huge fireball and the Iraqi observation post was obliterated.

"I pity anybody who's in there," a marine sergeant said. "We told them to surrender."

The destruction of Safwan Hill was a priority for the attacking forces because it had sophisticated surveillance equipment near the main highway that runs from Kuwait up to Basra and then Baghdad. The attacking US and British forces could not attempt to cross the border unless it was destroyed.

Marine Cobra helicopter gunships firing Hellfire missiles swept in low from the south. Then the marine howitzers, with a range of 30 kilometres, opened a sustained barrage over the next eight hours. They were supported by US Navy aircraft which dropped 40,000 pounds of explosives and napalm, a US officer told the Herald.

A legal expert at the International Committee of the Red Cross in Geneva said the use of napalm or fuel air bombs was not illegal "per se" because the US was not a signatory to the 1980 weapons convention which prohibits and restricts certain weapons. "But the US has to apply the basic principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and take all precautions to protect civilians. In the case of napalm and fuel air bombs, these are special precautions because these are area weapons, not specific weapons," said Dominique Loye, the committee's adviser on weapons and IHL.

When dawn broke on Safwan Hill, all that could be seen on top of it was a single antenna amid the smoke. The marines then moved forward, their officers saying they were determined to push on as quickly as possible for Baghdad.

The first air strike on Baghdad, and Mr Bush's announcement that the war was under way, appeared to catch US officers in the Kuwait desert by surprise.

The attack was originally planned for early today. But the US officers did not seem worried.

Within hours of Mr Bush's announcement, a vast army of tanks, trucks, bulldozers and heavy guns was surging through the dust of the Kuwaiti desert to positions on Iraq's border.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deadbodies

1 posted on 03/21/2003 7:05:01 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead
It's looking more and more like a rout. You have to pity the hapless Iraqi whose choice was our gun or Saddam's

I'll feel better too when the good guys start finding and showing the press some of the bad stuff...
2 posted on 03/21/2003 7:13:27 AM PST by IncPen (anybody else getting these automatic parentheses? Or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
dead bodies
3 posted on 03/21/2003 7:16:08 AM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Cool post. Saw some video of that yesterday.. Still praying for our troops.
4 posted on 03/21/2003 7:17:02 AM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
I searched on Everywhere and it didn't show up.

I just did it again and neither of them showed up.

5 posted on 03/21/2003 7:18:11 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead
Looks like an urgent call for virgins has just gone out...
6 posted on 03/21/2003 7:22:29 AM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
How to search.

martyrs

dead bodies

7 posted on 03/21/2003 7:35:48 AM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
Yes, I know how to search. I picked the keyword "everywhere." There were no results.

The search engine failed me. Had I selected a different word to search on, like "martyrs" it would have worked, but I didn't.

Such are the vagaries of life.

8 posted on 03/21/2003 8:35:38 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dead; IncPen; cake_crumb; M-cubed
The Sydney Morning Herald has been caught lying so many times - including the intentional alteration of wire service articles to change their meaning - that it should NEVER be trusted on anything.

The following was subsquented tacked onto the end of this story:

The Pentagon subsequently issued a statement to the Herald:

Your story ('Dead bodies everywhere', by Lindsay Murdoch, March 22, 2003) claiming US forces are using napalm in Iraq, is patently false. The US took napalm out of service in the early 1970s. We completed destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm. - Jeff A. Davis, Lieutenant Commander, US Navy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense.

The SMH lies. ALWAYS.

Also:

Pentagon denies report on napalm

March 24 2003

The Pentagon has a denied a report in The Age on Saturday that napalm was used in an attack by US Navy planes on an Iraqi position at Safwan Hill in southern Iraq.

A navy official in Washington, Lieutenant-Commander Danny Hernandez, said: "We don't even have that in our arsenal." The US military says it last used napalm in 1993 and destroyed its last batch of the weapon in 2001.

The report was filed by Age correspondent Lindsay Murdoch, who is attached to units of the First US Marine Division.

Murdoch's report was based on information from two marine officers, who said napalm was used in the air strike on the hill. One of the officers repeated that napalm was used when Murdoch was asked by The Age foreign editor to confirm the story on Friday.

9 posted on 03/23/2003 4:56:04 PM PST by Timesink (If you use the word "embedded" in a conversation, you'd better be carrying an x-ray to show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR

grouchymedia.com/

10 posted on 03/23/2003 4:59:11 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dead
My grandson's father is manning one of those Marine artillery units. We're mighty proud of him! Every night, my grandson says a prayer for Daddy and all of the people fighting over there.
11 posted on 03/23/2003 5:02:10 PM PST by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Napalm is too good for them anyway.

drop some phosphorus.
12 posted on 03/23/2003 5:03:40 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dead
"When dawn broke on Safwan Hill, all that could be seen on top of it was a single antenna amid the smoke."

"Hello, Manny? Yeah.......yeah, great. Look, buy me a million shares of whichever company built this antenna, ok???"

13 posted on 03/23/2003 5:07:45 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
BTTT
14 posted on 03/23/2003 8:44:02 PM PST by hattend (Dixie Chicks suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson