To: TexasGunLover
This is not what I heard (believe MSNBC but could have been FOX). I heard dems are holding this up because it had a clause in support of the Commander-in-Chief! They said the dems don't want to go on record supporting Bush' war etc
To: plain talk
Brit Hume said it was the 'breach' clause, not the commander-in-chief clause, so it figures MSNBC would say the opposite.
To: plain talk
I heard dems are holding this up because it had a clause in support of the Commander-in-Chief!
Nope, Fox mentioned that but said that wasn't what was holding up the resolution. Said it was the material breach clause.
67 posted on
03/20/2003 7:45:03 PM PST by
TexasGunLover
(The French Stink... literally... boycott everything French)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson