Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War to cost millions in Oscar revenues
SMH.COM.AU ^ | March 21 2003 (Australia Time) | AFP

Posted on 03/20/2003 11:29:25 AM PST by Ed_NYC

War to cost millions in Oscar revenues


March 21 2003

The spectre of war in Iraq is threatening to cost hundreds of millions of dollars in Oscars-generated revenue from services ranging from coveted advertising time to Botox shots for ageing movie stars.

Just days ahead of the scheduled ceremony that is usually the glamorous - and financially lucrative - high point of Hollywood's year, Oscars organisers are insisting that Sunday's show will still go on.

But they have refused to rule out postponing or even cancelling the show if war is raging in the Middle East amid fears that images of jewel-encrusted stars waltzing into the show would seem unseemly at a time of national crisis.

The Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences spends around $US41 million ($69.79 million) on staging the show, chief economist for the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation, Jack Kyser, said.

This is far less than the $US54 million that studios are estimated to spend on pre-awards publicity for nominees.

After announcing on Wednesday that the signature red carpet fashion show would be slashed from this year's festivities in favour of a more sombre event, organisers, broadcasters and much of the city of Los Angeles is worried that the huge financial boon the Oscars usually brings may be lost.

"We estimate that the Oscar impact on the Los Angeles county (alone) is $US118 million annually," said Kyser.

The decision to scale down the globally televised show has already taken its toll, with broadcasters losing out on at least some of their valuable commercial air-time and with photo agencies robbed of one of their most lucrative products, the Oscars arrivals.

Now hundreds of businesses and industries are waiting with bated breath to see whether war will force even more changes to the show.

Caterers, fashion designers, jewellers, limousine rental companies and other industries depend on the annual party for major revenues, including the estimated $US4 million spent on gifts for nominees and presenters.

Even Los Angeles' many plastic surgeons and the city's legions of professional bodyguards experience a traditional "Oscars rush" as vain stars seek to look their best for the cameras.

And the cinema industry is one of the major beneficiaries of the Oscars with nominated and winning films seeing a sharp increase in ticket receipts.

Economy Professor Randy Nelson of Colby College in the eastern US state of Maine estimated an Oscar nomination was worth around $US8 million in additional box office receipts.

An Oscar win brings in an extra $US16 million for movies that are already in cinemas when they win the award.

"People see the show on TV, the actors, the glamour ... it builds up the anticipation," Nelson said.

"If it was not to be televised, it would have some negative impact on the (films') revenue," he added.

Added to the immediate cost of any cancellation of the telecast would be the impact on tourism that the event that has been broadcast for 50 years usually generates.

"We couldn't buy that publicity," Leron Gubler, president of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, said of the impact the Oscars have in the 157 countries in which they are seen from Abu Dhabi to Yemen.

And the US ABC network, which is currently in talks with the Academy over whether the planned telecast will go ahead, stands to be a big loser if the ceremony is replaced by live coverage of the war.

The network, owned by the Walt Disney Co, charges up to $US1.5 million per 30 second commercial spot and usually generates between $US75 million to $US80 million in revenues from sponsors, a New York analyst said.

But sponsors and advertisers such as AOL-Time-Warner, General Motors and American Express could pull out of their huge contracts if the event or telecast is postponed or cancelled or if they feel their names are being attached to an event that could appear frivolous, he said.

In late 2001, television's Emmy awards were delayed twice after the September 11 terror strikes, only to be broadcast later to a largely indifferent public.

AFP



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: hollywood; oscars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
I feel so bad for the HollyWierd-I-Hate-America-crowd...NOT!
1 posted on 03/20/2003 11:29:26 AM PST by Ed_NYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
Boo-F'ing-Hoo
2 posted on 03/20/2003 11:31:14 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SengirV
Like I care.

--erik

3 posted on 03/20/2003 11:31:55 AM PST by erikm88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
I feel like weeping melodramatically.
4 posted on 03/20/2003 11:32:13 AM PST by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
SERVES 'EM RIGHT!!!! God DOES work in mysterious ways!
5 posted on 03/20/2003 11:32:13 AM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
Doesn't it just break your heart....!

< g >

6 posted on 03/20/2003 11:32:20 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Interesting thought....we've been planning this war for HOW many MONTHS....and this is the weekend of the Oscars.....and the WAR starts!!!!
7 posted on 03/20/2003 11:32:46 AM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
Geez, a bunch of pampered, over-indulged, sycophants won't be able to walk the red carpet and preen for the screen as they kiss each other's butts, and we're supposed to feel cheated.

Screw'em. Let 'em hold it in Baghdad.

8 posted on 03/20/2003 11:32:47 AM PST by theDentist (So..... This is Virginia..... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
fears that images of jewel-encrusted stars waltzing into the show would seem unseemly

I believe the word the author is looking for here is "frivolous". Nothing like raining death and destruction on others to make it easy to identify the "frivolous".

9 posted on 03/20/2003 11:35:27 AM PST by CubicleGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
Bada-bing bada-boom
10 posted on 03/20/2003 11:35:45 AM PST by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
VRWC at work! poor babies
11 posted on 03/20/2003 11:36:04 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
This is too sweeeeet! I love it.
12 posted on 03/20/2003 11:37:20 AM PST by Bekki4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
The spectre of war in Iraq is threatening to cost hundreds of millions of dollars in Oscars-generated revenue...

The SPECTRE of war? Well, too darn bad!!! Ha!ha!ha! I hope they lose their pants off in revenues!!!! It's about time these phoney creeps find out just how irrelevant they are!

13 posted on 03/20/2003 11:37:36 AM PST by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
What's a sycophant?

Whatever it is, it sounds like the right word for those people (Hollywood jerks).
14 posted on 03/20/2003 11:39:32 AM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
Well, I can see you haven't gotten your priorities straight! (^;
15 posted on 03/20/2003 11:41:32 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
Another added benefit from the war.
16 posted on 03/20/2003 11:41:59 AM PST by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
I just want to clear one thing up: The Hollywood stars did not cancel the red carpet entrance ceremony "out of respect for our soldiers", they canceled it because they are afraid of terrorist attacks and or freeper demonstrations.

They are selfish, Selfish, SELFISH.
17 posted on 03/20/2003 11:42:18 AM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
I wonder if this is the main reason so many stars were against the war to begin with. How long ago was the March 17 deadline known? Wasn't it while back?
18 posted on 03/20/2003 11:42:35 AM PST by BamaGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
In a word: Good.
19 posted on 03/20/2003 11:42:41 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_NYC
"The spectre of war in Iraq is threatening to cost hundreds of millions of dollars in Oscars-generated revenue from services ranging from coveted advertising time to Botox shots for ageing movie stars."

My first thought is 'so what' and 'who cares' about the traitors in Hollywood? After reading first line, think the author may actually feel the same way. . .

20 posted on 03/20/2003 11:43:02 AM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson