Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War Fuels Student Activism
Washington Post ^ | 03/19/2003 | By Cynthia L. Webb

Posted on 03/19/2003 1:12:22 PM PST by deisjaws

Edited on 03/19/2003 1:16:02 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

As a U.S.-led military effort against Iraq appears imminent, student groups for and against war are using the Internet to mobilize rallies, spread viewpoints and link up with like-minded organizations.

Students For War (www.studentsforwar.com and www.studentsforwar.org) describes itself as an ad-hoc committee to "build support across America for military action against the murderous regime of Iraq's Saddam Hussein." The group's home page has an online petition that the group plans to send to the White House. The site also features a message board forum, including a slew of posts in reaction to Bush's March 17 speech setting a 48-hour deadline for Hussein to leave Iraq. The site links to dozens of conservative think tanks and public policy groups, many with no apparent stands on an Iraq war, including the National Right to Life Committee and the National Rifle Association.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activism; college; patriotic; prowar; republicans; students; studentsforwar; usa; yaf
Only the first half is important ;)
1 posted on 03/19/2003 1:12:22 PM PST by deisjaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: deisjaws
What a novel idea for a news story! War Fuels Student Activism. Wow. I'll bet nobody else has thought of this angle! I guess that's the difference between The Washington Post and, say, my high school newspaper (The Ram Pages, if I recall correctly).

(steely)

2 posted on 03/19/2003 1:38:29 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deisjaws
Cynthia details the groups involved in these pro-America rallies...isn't that special... and in stark contrast to AP and WP's treatment of the pro-Saddam rallies. The press wouldn't be trying to "de-legitimize" the "Pro-America" faction by labeling it "right wing", would they?

AP-WP promoted and whitewashed the many well-funded, far-left rallies organized largely by anti-American international communists without naming the many self-proclaimed socialist, anti-Capitalist, anti-American sponsors of those events.

That's un-American. That's propaganda.


3 posted on 03/19/2003 3:07:05 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl (Every Florida county voted at least twice in 2000. Gore lost 1, 2, 3 times...and in 2002.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Those little weasels should be learning the three R's and leave the politics to the adults who pay the taxes and their tuition.
4 posted on 03/19/2003 5:45:21 PM PST by Thebaddog (woof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog


5 posted on 03/19/2003 6:02:21 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
AP-WP promoted and whitewashed the many well-funded, far-left rallies organized largely by anti-American international communists without naming the many self-proclaimed socialist, anti-Capitalist, anti-American sponsors of those events.

That's un-American. That's propaganda.

Which offers an interesting possibility, based on a Clinton-era precedent....

Serb TV station was legitimate target, says Blair By Richard Norton-Taylor
Saturday April 24, 1999

Nato leaders yesterday scrambled to justify the bombing of Serbia's state television station in an attack which killed a number of civilian workers and marked a further widening in the scope of targets now considered legitimate.

The attack on the building in the centre of Belgrade - which contradicted an apparent assurance by Nato this month that only transmitters would be hit - was condemned by international journalists' organisations, representing both employers and unions.

Reporters at the scene said they saw the almost decapitated body of one man dangling from the rubble, and the body of a make-up artist. Another man was trapped between two concrete blocks. Doctors amputated his legs at the site but he later died. The state-run news agency Tanjug said about 150 people were inside the building at the time of the attack. The minister without portfolio, Goran Matic, said that in addition to 10 dead and 18 wounded, at least 20 people were feared buried in the rubble.

Officials said the missile also destroyed a satellite link with Eurovision used by foreign television crews to transmit material abroad, though the station was back on the air in Serbia within six hours.........

Tony Blair, in Washington for Nato's 50th anniversary summit, insisted that bombing television stations was 'entirely justified' since they were part of the 'apparatus of dictatorship and power of Milosevic'....

At a heated press briefing at the Ministry of Defence, Clare Short, the international development secretary, said: 'This is a war, this is a serious conflict, untold horrors are being done. The propaganda machine is prolonging the war and it's a legitimate target.'

Admiral Sir Ian Garnett, chief of joint operations at the ministry of defence, said Mr Milosevic's 'propaganda machine consists of transmitters but also the studios from which the information is transmitted. That makes it part of the overall military structure. Both elements have to be attacked.'

Nato's military spokesman, Air Commodore David Wilby, two weeks ago described RTS, the Serbian state broadcasting station, as a 'legitimate target which filled the airways with hate and with lies over the years'. However, Jamie Shea, the Nato council spokesman, denied that RTS was a target, distinguishing between transmitters 'integrated into [military] command and control commmunications' and normal broadcasting facilities.

On April 12, Mr Shea told Aidan White, the general secretary of the International Federation of Journalists, that Nato would 'target military targets only. Television and radio towers are only struck if they are integrated into military facilities, as they often are in Yugoslavia,' he said, but added: 'There is no policy to strike television and radio transmitters as such.'

In a statement yesterday, the IFJ condemned the attack, warning that it could lead to reprisals against independent journalists who have been campaigning against controls imposed by the Milosevic regime. 'We have been trying to trace journalists who have gone missing or been detained by the Serb authorities. Their plight is made ever more perilous by this latest strike,' it said.

John Foster, general secretary of the National Union of Journalists described the attack as 'barbarity'. He added: 'Killing journalists does not stop censorship, it only brings more repression.' Peter Almond, chairman of the Defence Correspondents' Association, expressed 'considerable disquiet', particularly in the light of Mr Shea's assurance to the IFJ.

In Geneva, the European Broadcasting Union, which groups the main stations in and around Europe, said the Belgrade television centre had been used to transmit news reports by international as well as local media. 'We do not see how the suppression of news sources can serve any useful purpose,' the EBU's president, Albert Scharf, said.

'Over and beyond the deaths involved, the EBU is concerned about any attempts to limit the rights of audiences to full news services....'

6 posted on 03/19/2003 6:40:12 PM PST by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: deisjaws
My university is full of the LOUD, annoying anti-war folks...they bragged that a whole 350 students walked out of class a couple weeks ago. They neglected to emphasize the fact that there are 22,000 students, making it a grand total of 1.6% of the student population who cares enough about protesting the war to walk out. Most of my friends are either in favor of military action, or don't care either way.

They're not as big as they think they are - they're just louder and do not respect police rules/requests and campus regulations against use of bullhorns, etc. Many of them are anti-Bush not anti-war, and refuse to listen to evidence or reason when presented with it.

Through some of the pro-war sites (I dislike that term, makes you sound bloodthirsty), I have connected with other students at my university, and we hope to organize and take action when we return from Spring break this weekend.
8 posted on 03/20/2003 4:39:53 AM PST by Rubber_Duckie_27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson