The actions of these hypothetical assassins of yours make about as much sense as a soup sandwich.
As far as historical precedents for criminals assassinating government officials to avoid extradition, I suggest you scrupulously avoid reading anything about Pablo Escobar - ignorance is not only bliss in your case, it's the only thing that makes your case possible.
Live it up while you can, Southack.
Drug gangs don't assassinate corrupt politicos who can be bought, especially when said politicos can bring down the might of the army against said drug gangs, and certainly *not* arrange for the timing of the hit to be just as the global political stakes are reaching their climax vis a vis Iraq.
Thus, the repeated claim that you keep making is pure nonsense, suitable for belief by only those few souls who care to fill their empty heads with *any* excuse rather than hear the painful truth.
And the truth is that Zolan was killed due to his role in regard to keeping silent (or not) about his Germanic and Franco masters' double-standard about going to war without UN approval, as France and Germany did to Serbia only 4 short years ago, compared to how they demanded that the U.S. *not* do the same thing in Iraq today.
This limits the *motivated* groups of assassins to:
1. France / Germany (if they thought that Zolan was going to cease being quiet about said double standard)
2. Britain / Germany / France (if Blair's/Scroeder's/Chirac's pro-Serbian-War buddies got frightened about the truth finally coming out or that the Serbs might attempt to stir up military trouble during the Iraq war) or my odds-on bet:
3. Milosovich's nationalistic buddies (who knew that they had to act rather quickly to end the Serbian silence on the world stage regarding France and Germany's double-standard).
But you being you, I fully expect you to post yet more ridiculous spiels about how some non-political group made the professional hit on the now-deceased Serb politician.
And who knows, a few naive souls might even fall for your rubbish.