Posted on 03/19/2003 5:55:30 AM PST by clintonbaiter
For those of us old enough to remember WWII, the runup to Gulf War 2 has been instructive. We have re-learned that human nature doesn't change. The lessons of history are again forgotten.
When we notice today's intellectual elites parading their anxieties and cowardice as high moral principle, appeasement seems only comprehensible in the context of history. However, memories of Chamberlain announcing "peace in our time" to cheering throngs hold no lessons for our chattering classes. They argue that today's demonstrators chanting "peace" require us to continue the UN inspections charade -- that the easily-swayed crowds must be right.
The history of "peace" movements, as protectors of tyrants like Stalin, is meaningless to contemporary utopians. Our 21st century peace marchers do not remember Picasso's peace doves, held aloft by an earlier generation's 'useful idiots', marching for Communist tyranny. Whether it's Tom Friedman, turning against the war following conversations with his nervous spouse, or Maureen Dowd, Pat Buchanan and others sounding like the 1930s' pro-Hitler anti-semite, Charles Lindbergh, the sorry spectacle of academics, artists and opinion makers expending energy in denial of the obvious -- that there are people with the means and motive to kill us -- is painfully edifying.
Alistair Cooke, remembering similar debates in England during the 1930's, notes that "..so many of the arguments mounted against each other today, in the last fortnight, are exactly what we heard in the House of Commons debates and read in the French press. The French especially urged, after every Hitler invasion, 'negotiation, negotiation'. They negotiated so successfully as to have their whole country defeated and occupied. But as one famous French leftist said: 'We did anyway manage to make them declare Paris an open city -- no bombs on us!'"
Surprisingly, it is not the wordsmith intellectuals, and not the editorial opinion shapers, who have learned from the past. The New York Times editorial page once minimized Stalin's barbarism and now still does the same for Saddam. However, while Gail Collins and Howell Raines verge on hysteria in the editorial pages of the NYTimes, our unverbal, much disdained "cowboy" President is able to face down the threat using blunt declarative sentences. .................
(Excerpt) Read more at iconoclast.ca ...
A perfect description of the draft dodgers and peaceniks, including Bill and Hillary, during the Vietnam era. Because they were cowards they tried to make their positions noble by tarnishing the opposition. A tried a true tactic of the left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.