Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Green Goblin
Your argument does nothing to refute the fact that infanticide is sometimes morally justifiable according to God

The creator of a painting has the natural right to destroy it. The creation belongs to the creator, by definition. Analogously, the Creator of life has the right to take life away.

Keep in mind though that, although God has the right to destroy His Creation, he does not destroy human beings. In fact, he is merciful to us, in that when our earthly life is ended we have the opportunity to live with Him forever in eternal bliss. God also honors the choice of people who choose not to live with Him forever. Therefore, it's possible that many of the Canaanite children that were killed went on to a greater life.

535 posted on 03/21/2003 8:36:44 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
Irrelevant analogy. A painting is an inanimate object. A person is an end in himself, not a means to an end. By your reasoning, infanticide by parents is perfectly justified.
537 posted on 03/21/2003 8:40:38 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies ]

To: Aquinasfan
The creator of a painting has the natural right to destroy it. The creation belongs to the creator, by definition. Analogously, the Creator of life has the right to take life away.

We're talking about moral aboslutes here, and the fact remains that you're arguing that it is sometimes moral to kill children. That's an instance of situational ethics rather than moral absolutes...

549 posted on 03/21/2003 10:58:35 AM PST by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson