Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
Irrelevant analogy. A painting is an inanimate object. A person is an end in himself, not a means to an end. By your reasoning, infanticide by parents is perfectly justified.
537 posted on 03/21/2003 8:40:38 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
Irrelevant analogy. A painting is an inanimate object. A person is an end in himself, not a means to an end. By your reasoning, infanticide by parents is perfectly justified.

This is not at all an irrelevant analogy. True, a painting belongs to a different category than human beings, but human beings belong to a different category than God. The difference between God and men is far greater than the difference between a man and a painting. The difference is infinite in all respects. God transcends all categories.

A human being is an ultimate end in one sense but not in another. Yet even earthly human life is not an ultimate end, since the taking of human life is often justifiable. In fact, individual lives can be sacrificed for the common good, as in the case of war. Ultimately, eternal life with God is the end that human life is directed toward.

553 posted on 03/21/2003 11:07:32 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson