Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Protagoras
Aquinas didn't advocate bearing false witness.

Huh?

The question isn't whether it is moral to criminalize intrinsically evil acts, the question is whether it is prudent to criminalize particular evil acts.

It isn't moral nor prudent.

What? Homosexuality? How can homosexual activity be considered moral? It is obviously an unnatural act, opposed to the natural law and nature's God.

52 posted on 03/19/2003 8:42:33 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
Huh?

You did that, hit your knees.

How can homosexual activity be considered moral?

It is not, which of course wasn't the question. But you knew that, hit your knees.

"The question isn't whether it is moral to criminalize intrinsically evil acts, the question is whether it is prudent to criminalize particular evil acts.

That was the question.

57 posted on 03/19/2003 8:51:35 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson