Huh?
The question isn't whether it is moral to criminalize intrinsically evil acts, the question is whether it is prudent to criminalize particular evil acts.
It isn't moral nor prudent.
What? Homosexuality? How can homosexual activity be considered moral? It is obviously an unnatural act, opposed to the natural law and nature's God.
You did that, hit your knees.
How can homosexual activity be considered moral?
It is not, which of course wasn't the question. But you knew that, hit your knees.
"The question isn't whether it is moral to criminalize intrinsically evil acts, the question is whether it is prudent to criminalize particular evil acts.
That was the question.