[Protagoras]

The thread is about sodomy laws. You have tried in vain to tie crime to consensual sex.

PS,,,Looking at my profile only confirms that you looked there for possible ammunition to make ad hominem attacks.

You need to brush up on your argumentation skills. Which are currently on the jr. high level.

[HumanaeVitae]

No, what you are arguing is that homosexuality should be accepted in society, for some unstated reason. I hope you'll state it.

My argument is straightforward. Homosexuals cannot survive without the broader heterosexual community around them. Their lifestyle is too destructive to survive on their own. Therefore, they are socializing the costs of their behavior on the heterosexual community. Heterosexuals can survive without homosexuals, but not vice-versa. Therefore, we have every reason to limit their "rights" as we see fit.

If you want to have a broader argument...then answer these questions: atheist or theist, and are you, or are you not a force/fraud/coercion-exception libertarian?

[steve-b]

You need to brush up on your argumentation skills. Which are currently on the jr. high level.

If HV's arguments are typical of "the jr. high level", then education in this country has swirled even further down the bowl that I'd thought.