Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Protagoras
Strawman.

Nope.

Many states have done away with this nonsense legislatively. I saw one poster opine that it would be overturned, I have seen no one speak in favor of it being overturned. If I missed one, please cite the posts.

You must have missed the title of the thread then. Are you saying that the people on this thread who are in agreement with the Cato Institute are NOT advocating that the SC overturn it

I noticed you didn't answer this part.

Because it was non relevant. Will you come out and say then, that you hope the SC does NOT overturn the law?

295 posted on 03/19/2003 11:57:21 AM PST by Hacksaw (She's not that kind of girl, Booger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: Hacksaw
Are you saying that the people on this thread who are in agreement with the Cato Institute are NOT advocating that the SC overturn it

I'm saying that you made a charge, I asked you to cite the posts. You cannot. Because you made it up, as usual.

Will you come out and say then, that you hope the SC does NOT overturn the law?

Why would I say that? I don't care one way or the other. It has never been overturned judicially that I'm aware of, but I think it has been overturned legislatively many times.

You act like overturning a bad law is something your band of merry men thinks is bad, is that so?

312 posted on 03/19/2003 12:06:06 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson