I would think a libertarian would rather do this legislatively, instead of having a judge do the heavy lifting for him.
Lots of name calling from the libertarians here - calling people Nazis, comparing people to the Taliban and Hillary.
No wonder nobody takes them seriously.
Strawman. Many states have done away with this nonsense legislatively. I saw one poster opine that it would be overturned, I have seen no one speak in favor of it being overturned. If I missed one, please cite the posts.
Lots of name calling from the libertarians here - calling people Nazis, comparing people to the Taliban and Hillary.
Your buddy Bosco came onto the thread doing it, I fired back. I'll do it everytime, it shows him up for what he is.
And btw, no one in their right mind takes you clowns seriously.
Then it should not come as a surprise to discover they are really just the shocktroops or useful idiots for the Democratic Socialists.
They want the same thing for dope.
Strawman. Many states have done away with this nonsense legislatively. I saw one poster opine that it would be overturned, I have seen no one speak in favor of it being overturned. If I missed one, please cite the posts.
I noticed you didn't answer this part.
No, because there is no consistutional basis for the law in the first place. This is a finding, not a decision, by the judge, just as determining that the number 23 is prime is a finding, not a decision, by the mathematician.
Libertarians favor the courts checking the unbridled power of legislatures enacting un-Constitutional measures, i.e. removing laws conflicting with the Constitution.
Liberals favor the courts enhancing laws, increasing the power of government over the people, Constitutionally or not.
Naw, no difference - only that they're exact opposites !